Plant-pollinator community network response to species invasion depends on both invader and community characteristics

Oikos ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 406-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Campbell ◽  
Suann Yang ◽  
Réka Albert ◽  
Katriona Shea
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. LaManna ◽  
Laura A. Burkle ◽  
R. Travis Belote ◽  
Jonathan A. Myers

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0256929
Author(s):  
Elise Verrier ◽  
Emmanuelle Baudry ◽  
Carmen Bessa-Gomes

Pollinator insects forage in complex and unpredictable resource landscapes, often using social information from congeneric individuals to acquire knowledge about their environment. It has long been recognized that this process allows them to exploit floral resources more efficiently and thus increase individual fitness. However, by creating correlations between the behaviors of pollinators within a population, this could also indirectly influence the entire plant-pollinator community. One type of social information used by pollinators is the scent mark left on the corolla of flowers by previous visitors, which can be used as a cue to avoid recently depleted resources. We developed a spatially explicit agent-based model to examine the effects, at both individual and community levels, of pollinators using these scent marks. The model simulates a population of pollinators foraging on flowers in a continuous 2D space in which we can vary the density of pollinators. We showed that the use of scent marks as a source of information significantly increased the foraging efficiency of pollinators except when competition between pollinators was very low. At the community level, this also resulted in a marked homogenization between floral resources within the landscape: in the absence of scent marks, the coefficient of variation of the remaining nectar quantity per flower strongly increased with greater pollinator competition, but it remained low at all levels of competition when scent marks were used by the pollinators. Finally, the use of scent marks markedly decreased the number of pollinator flower visits, especially at high levels of pollinator competition, which can potentially reduce the pollination service.


Author(s):  
Patricia Landaverde-González ◽  
Eunice Enríquez ◽  
Juan Núñez-Farfán

AbstractIn recent years, evidence has been found that plant-pollinator interactions are altered by land-use and that genetic diversity also plays a role. However, how land-use and genetic diversity influence plant–pollinator interactions, particularly in the Neotropics, where many endemic plants exist is still an open question. Cucurbita pepo is a monoecious plant and traditional crop wide distributed, with high rates of molecular evolution, landraces associated with human cultural management and a history of coevolution with bees, which makes this species a promising model for studying the effect of landscape and genetic diversity on plant-pollinator interactions. Here, we assess (1) whether female and male flowers differences have an effect on the interaction network, (2) how C. pepo genetic diversity affects flower-bee visitation network structure, and (3) what is the effect that land-use, accounting for C. pepo genetic variability, has on pumpkin-bee interaction network structure. Our results indicate that female and male flowers presented the same pollinator community composition and interaction network structure suggesting that female/male differences do not have a significant effect on network evolution. Genetic diversity has a positive effect on modularity, nestedness and number of interactions. Further, the effect of semi-natural areas on nestedness could be buffered when genetic diversity is high. Our results suggest that considering genetic diversity is relevant for a better understanding of the effect of land-use on interaction networks. Additionally, this understanding has great value in conserving biodiversity and enhancing the stability of interaction networks in a world facing great challenges of habitat and diversity loss.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianalberto Losapio ◽  
Miguel A. Fortuna ◽  
Jordi Bascompte ◽  
Bernhard Schmid ◽  
Richard Michalet ◽  
...  

SignificanceAlthough it is known that plant–plant and plant–pollinator interactions can strongly influence biodiversity and its effects on ecosystem functioning, the details of how competition and facili-tation among plants scale up to mutualistic interactions with pollinators and thus affect pollina-tion networks are poorly understood. We introduce a simple experimental system in which we control local plant interactions, measure pollinator responses and characterize plant–pollinator networks. We find that facilitation among plants produces synergistic and antagonistic effects on the pollinator community affecting the architecture and robustness of plant–pollinator net-works. Our results provide evidence for bottom-up non-additive effects of plant interactions on pollination networks and have implications for the way we study and manage ecosystems.


Ecography ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 1558-1568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Reverté ◽  
Jordi Bosch ◽  
Xavier Arnan ◽  
Tomas Roslin ◽  
Constantí Stefanescu ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 1794-1808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren C. Ponisio ◽  
Kate Wilkin ◽  
Leithen K. M'Gonigle ◽  
Kelly Kulhanek ◽  
Lindsay Cook ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignasi Bartomeus ◽  
Jochen Fründ ◽  
Neal M. Williams

Entomophilous exotic plant species not only compete directly for space and light with other plants, but also offer resource opportunities for the native pollinator community. Most research on this topic to date has taken the plant perspective, focusing on how successful plant invaders integrate into the native plant-pollinator interaction networks. However, species specific responses of pollinators to the addition of exotic plants are rarely taken into account. We show here that while some bumble bees and other trophic generalist bees can benefit from exotic plant invasions, other species can be negatively affected. Behavioral flexibility may be the key to persist in a changing world.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document