scholarly journals Issue Information ‐ Pricing

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Keyword(s):  
1996 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 365-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conrad S. Ciccotello ◽  
C. Terry Grant

1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 251-257
Author(s):  
Maria E. Burke ◽  
Joanne Rigby

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zehua Liu ◽  
Nan Zhang ◽  
Hongfeng Han
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoming Xu ◽  
Vikash Ramiah ◽  
Imad Moosa ◽  
Sinclair Davidson

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to: first, test if information-adjusted noise model (IANM) can be applied in China; second, quantify noise trader risk, overreaction, underreaction and information pricing errors in that market; and third, explain the relationship between noise trader risk and return. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use a behavioural asset pricing model (BAPM), CAPM, the information-adjusted noise model and model proposed by Ramiah and Davidson (2010). Findings – The findings show that noise traders are active 99.7 per cent of the time on the Shenzhen A-share market. Furthermore, our results suggest that the Shenzhen market overreacts 41 per cent of the time, underreacts 18 per cent of the time and information pricing errors occur 40 per cent of the time. Originality/value – Various methods have been applied to the Chinese stock market in an effort to measure noise trading activities and all of them failed to account for information arrival. Our study uses a superior and alternative model to detect noise trader risk, overreaction and underreaction in China.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document