Assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for orthodontic anchorage: influence of side, gender and skeletal patterns

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Basañez Aleluia Costa ◽  
Candice Belchior Silva Duplat ◽  
Iêda Crusoé‐Rebello ◽  
Frederico Sampaio Neves
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Anchorage

Implants for Orthodontic Anchorage

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan C. Rodriguez ◽  
Fernando Suarez ◽  
Hsun-Liang Chan ◽  
Miguel Padial-Molina ◽  
Hom-Lay Wang
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Anchorage

scholarly journals Rapid maxillary expansion: Do banded teeth develop more external root resorption than non-banded anchorage teeth?

2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Débora C Martins ◽  
Bernardo Q Souki ◽  
Paula L Cheib ◽  
Gerluza A.B Silva ◽  
Igor D.G Reis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Resorption ◽  
Rapid Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Orthodontic Anchorage ◽  
External Root Resorption ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Band Group ◽  
Orthodontic Forces ◽  
Root Surfaces

ABSTRACT Objective:  To compare external root resorption (ERR) when bands and wires are used as orthodontic anchorage during rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Materials and Methods:  Histologic analysis was performed on 108 sites from 18 maxillary first premolars and on 36 sites from six mandibular first premolars in nine subjects (mean age = 15.2 ± 1.4 years) 3 months after RME. Maxillary teeth were pooled into two groups (n = 54 each) according to the type of orthodontic anchorage (band group [BG] vs wire group [WG]). Anchorage type was randomly chosen in a split-mouth design. Mandibular first premolars, which were not subjected to orthodontic forces, were used as the control group (CG). Results:  All premolars in the BG and WG showed ERR at the level of the cementum and dentin. Repair with cementum cells was observed in all resorption areas, but complete repair was rarely found. No statistically significant difference was found between the BG and WG with regard to the ERR. No association was found between the root height position (middle or cervical third) and the incidence of ERR. Buccal root surfaces showed a higher amount of ERR compared with the palatal and interproximal surfaces. ERR was not found in any teeth in the CG. Conclusion:  All maxillary first premolars subjected to RME showed ERR and partial cementum repair. Banded teeth did not develop more ERR than nonbanded anchorage teeth.

Déplacement orthodontique des 3es molaires mandibulaires avec le système Orthodontic Anchorage Spider Screw® (OASS)

2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolà Derton ◽  
Alessandro Perini ◽  
Roberto Derton ◽  
Giovanni Blondi
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Anchorage

scholarly journals Subperiosteal Anchorage in Orthodontics: A Narrative Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (18) ◽  
pp. 8376
Author(s):  
Marco Serafin ◽  
Cinzia Maspero ◽  
Salvatore Bocchieri ◽  
Rosamaria Fastuca ◽  
Alberto Caprioglio
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Biomechanical Properties ◽  
Previous Literature ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Orthodontic Anchorage ◽  
Clinical Procedure ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Current Review ◽  
Starting Point

Orthodontic anchorage is a necessity for every treatment and must be carefully evaluated by the orthodontist. It is defined as the resistance to unwanted dental movement of a tooth or a number of teeth by using different techniques. The purpose of the present paper is to highlight the subperiosteal anchorage applied to orthodontics; this technique has been debated in the literature and the purpose here is to summarize the fields of application. During the first check of previous literature 548 results were found, which have been reduced to 19 selected papers after application of the inclusion criteria and the elimination of duplicates. Multiple electronic databases were searched from 1 January 1995 to 31 December 2020 in order to identify papers eligible for current review. The data obtained by this review underlined the versatility of onplants used as absolute anchorage during orthodontic treatments, the advantages and disadvantages, the biomechanical properties and survival rates, and the clinical procedure. Further clinical studies and research are required to explore other kinds of application and to state specific guidelines; however, this study represents an update and a starting point for clinicians who want to use these devices and for further improvement of the technique.

Failure rates of palatal implants or mini-screws for orthodontic anchorage

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-11
Author(s):  
Reint Meursinge Reynders ◽  
Luisa Isaia
Keyword(s):  
Failure Rates ◽  
Orthodontic Anchorage

Miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: a review of available systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aslam Alkadhimi ◽  
Ebrahim A. Al-Awadhi
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Anchorage
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document