The effect of prepregnancy body mass index on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and dose‐response meta‐analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 472-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid Najafi ◽  
Jalil Hasani ◽  
Neda Izadi ◽  
Seyed‐Saeed Hashemi‐Nazari ◽  
Zahra Namvar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prepregnancy Body Mass Index

scholarly journals A Comparison of the Changes in Gestational Weight, Body Mass Index, and Serum Vitamin D Level in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Patients Complemented with Vitamin D in Contrast to Those Who Did Not Receive the Supplement: A Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 74-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumanta Saha ◽  
Sujata Saha
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gestational Weight ◽  
Statistical Heterogeneity

<b><i>Aims:</i></b> To date, it is largely unknown how body mass index (BMI), gestational weight (GW), and stored vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels change in the vitamin D-supplemented gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients, irrespective of their pre-pregnancy BMI. Therefore, to study this association, a prospective systematic review and meta-analysis protocol is proposed here. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Primarily, different databases (PubMed, Embase and Scopus) will be searched (without any limitation to date or language) for randomised parallel-arm trials comparing GW, BMI and stored vitamin D level in the body among GDM patients who were supplemented and not supplemented with vitamin D, besides their conventional GDM care. The study selection process and the consecutive risk of bias assessment will adhere to the PRISMA 2009 flow chart and the Cochrane collaboration’s guideline, respectively. These interventions’ effect on the respective outcomes will be compared by meta-analysis (along with an assessment of the statistical heterogeneity) when comparable data will be available from at least 4 studies. Subgroup analysis and Egger’s meta-regression will follow if an adequate number of trials are available. Narrative reporting will be considered when a quantitative comparison is not feasible for any of the outcomes. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The proposed review aims to compare the BMI, GW, and 25(OH)D levels in the blood between the vitamin D supplemented and not supplemented GDM patients.

176 Prepregnancy body mass index and gestational diabetes mellitus across asian subpopulations

2021 ◽  
Vol 224 (2) ◽  
pp. S118-S119
Author(s):  
Meryl Sperling ◽  
Stephanie A. Leonard ◽  
Anne R. Waldrop ◽  
Sarah Miller ◽  
Yair J. Blumenfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Prepregnancy Body Mass Index

scholarly journals The role of obesity and overweight as a factor of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review

2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 87-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Victorovich Kapustin ◽  
Ol’ga Nikolaevna Arzhanova ◽  
Olesya Nikolaevna Bespalova ◽  
Vladimir Stepanovich Pakin ◽  
Andrey Gennadievich Kiselev
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Excess Weight

Objective: on the basis of a systematic review, clarify the role of overweight and obesity as a predictor of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Materials and methods: an analysis of the literature data of the leading bibliographic sources - MEDLINE, Cochrane col., EMBASE. To evaluate the body mass index and standards of weight gain during pregnancy used the WHO guidelines and criteria of the Institute of Medicine (2009). The frequency and the odds ratio (OR) of developing GDM was estimated separately for each of the three groups in BMI. Results: A systematic review included 23 different design studies involving 740 510 women. It was found that the odds ratio of the risk of GDM in a group of pregnant women with excess weight is doubled - 2.22 (95 % CI 1.72 - 3.64), and almost four in obesity - 3.88 (95 % CI 2.97 - 5.32). The incidence of GDM in a group of pregnant women with normal body mass index - 3.77 % in the group with excess body weight - 6.59 %, in the group with obesity - 9.88 %. Conclusions: The obtained strong evidence of a direct connection between the linear increase in maternal BMI and the risk of developing gestational diabetes. Pregnant women with excess weight and obesity are at high risk for carbohydrate disorders during pregnancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document