Systematic review of lifestyle interventions to limit postpartum weight retention: implications for future opportunities to prevent maternal overweight and obesity following childbirth

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 792-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. van der Pligt ◽  
J. Willcox ◽  
K. D. Hesketh ◽  
K. Ball ◽  
S. Wilkinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overweight And Obesity ◽  
Lifestyle Interventions ◽  
Postpartum Weight Retention ◽  
Weight Retention ◽  
Postpartum Weight ◽  
Maternal Overweight

scholarly journals Eating behaviors in relation to gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Margriet Bijlholt ◽  
Hanne Van Uytsel ◽  
Lieveke Ameye ◽  
Roland Devlieger ◽  
Annick Bogaerts
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Gestational Weight Gain ◽  
Eating Behaviors ◽  
Postpartum Weight Retention ◽  
Weight Retention ◽  
Gestational Weight ◽  
Postpartum Weight

scholarly journals 1463Impact of missing outcome data in meta-analyses of lifestyle interventions during pregnancy to reduce postpartum-weight-retention

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Harris ◽  
Marijka Batterham ◽  
Elizabeth Neale ◽  
Isabel Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Data ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Lifestyle Interventions ◽  
Postpartum Weight Retention ◽  
Weight Retention ◽  
Intervention Effects ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Postpartum Weight ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background High risk of bias associated with missing outcome data (MOD) in meta-analyses (MAs) of the effects of lifestyle interventions during pregnancy on postpartum weight retention (PPWR), casts doubt on whether such interventions can be relied upon as truly effective, since estimates are deemed valid only if MOD was missing at random (MAR). Methods We conducted a systematic overview of MAs to examine the impact of MOD on the estimation of meta-analytic summary intervention effects and conducted sensitivity analyses using pattern mixture models and informative missingness parameters (describing how the outcome in the missing participants may be related to the outcome in the completers), to ascertain the robustness of the estimates to reasonable deviations from the MAR assumption. Results Three relevant MAs were identified, all with high MOD rates in the RCTs included (median>30%), and all reporting beneficial intervention effects on PPWR (in kg) estimated based on complete case analyses: [-0.78 (95%CI: -1.39,-0.16), -0.81 (-1.57,-0.06), and -0.94 (-1.52,-0.37)] in MAs of any lifestyle, exercise, or diet + exercise interventions, respectively. In plausible scenarios where the outcome for the intervention group in participants with vs without MOD was worse (by 0.5kg), effect estimates were attenuated in all and no longer significant in 2 of the MAs [-0.58 (-1.29,0.13), -0.70 (-1.50,0.10) and -0.88 (-1.73,-0.02)]. Conclusions Statistical significance was retained when all 19 RCTs identified across MAs were meta-analysed: -0.63 (-0.17,-0.08). Key messages The clinical relevancy of effects of this magnitude remains unclear.

scholarly journals Postpartum weight retention and sleep: a systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 75 (OCE1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Alrefaai ◽  
G.TH. Ellison ◽  
G.R. Law ◽  
E.M. Scott
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Postpartum Weight Retention ◽  
Weight Retention ◽  
Postpartum Weight

scholarly journals The impact of sleep, stress, and depression on postpartum weight retention: A systematic review

2014 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 351-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui S. Xiao ◽  
Aimee R. Kroll-Desrosiers ◽  
Robert J. Goldberg ◽  
Sherry L. Pagoto ◽  
Sharina D. Person ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Postpartum Weight Retention ◽  
Weight Retention ◽  
Postpartum Weight ◽  
The Impact
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document