scholarly journals Review of the evidence regarding the use of antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

2019 ◽  
Vol 1444 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan W. Bourassa ◽  
Saskia J.M. Osendarp ◽  
Seth Adu‐Afarwuah ◽  
Saima Ahmed ◽  
Clayton Ajello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Micronutrient Supplementation ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Multiple Micronutrient ◽  
Low And Middle Income

scholarly journals Vitamin and Mineral Supplementation During Pregnancy on Maternal, Birth, Child Health and Development Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Oh ◽  
Emily C. Keats ◽  
Zulfiqar A. Bhutta
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Child Health ◽  
Low Birthweight ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Micronutrient Supplementation ◽  
Maternal Anemia ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Almost two billion people are deficient in key vitamins and minerals, mostly women and children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Deficiencies worsen during pregnancy due to increased energy and nutritional demands, causing adverse outcomes in mother and child, but could be mitigated by interventions like micronutrient supplementation. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review that aimed to compile evidence from both efficacy and effectiveness trials, evaluating different supplementation interventions on maternal, birth, child health, and developmental outcomes. We evaluated randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies published since 1995 in peer-reviewed and grey literature that assessed the effects of calcium, vitamin A, iron, vitamin D, and zinc supplementation compared to placebo/no treatment; iron-folic (IFA) supplementation compared to folic acid only; multiple micronutrient (MMN) supplementation compared to IFA; and lipid-based nutrient supplementation (LNS) compared to MMN supplementation. Seventy-two studies, which collectively involved 314 papers (451,723 women), were included. Meta-analyses showed improvement in several key birth outcomes, such as preterm birth, small-for-gestational age (SGA) and low birthweight with MMN supplementation, compared to IFA. MMN also improved child outcomes, including diarrhea incidence and retinol concentration, which are findings not previously reported. Across all comparisons, micronutrient supplementation had little to no effect on mortality (maternal, neonatal, perinatal, and infant) outcomes, which is consistent with other systematic reviews. IFA supplementation showed notable improvement in maternal anemia and the reduction in low birthweight, whereas LNS supplementation had no apparent effect on outcomes; further research that compares LNS and MMN supplementation could help understand differences with these commodities. For single micronutrient supplementation, improvements were noted in only a few outcomes, mainly pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (calcium), maternal anemia (iron), preterm births (vitamin D), and maternal serum zinc concentration (zinc). These findings highlight that micronutrient-specific supplementation should be tailored to specific groups or needs for maximum benefit. In addition, they further contribute to the ongoing discourse of choosing antenatal MMN over IFA as the standard of care in LMICs.

scholarly journals Nutritional perspectives for the prevention and mitigation of COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Akhtar ◽  
Jai K Das ◽  
Tariq Ismail ◽  
Muqeet Wahid ◽  
Wisha Saeed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Micronutrient Supplementation ◽  
Micronutrient Deficiencies ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Nutritional Interventions ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
Viable Approach ◽  
Micronutrient Fortification ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Worldwide, there is an array of clinical trials under way to evaluate treatment options against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Concurrently, several nutritional therapies and alternative supportive treatments are also being used and tested to reduce the mortality associated with acute respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19. In the context of COVID-19, improved nutrition that includes micronutrient supplementation to augment the immune system has been recognized as a viable approach to both prevent and alleviate the severity of the infection. The potential role of micronutrients as immune-boosting agents is particularly relevant for low- and middle-income countries, which already have an existing high burden of undernutrition and micronutrient deficiencies. A systematic literature review was performed to identify nutritional interventions that might prevent or aid in the recovery from COVID-19. The PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched electronically from February to April 2020. All abstracts and full-text articles were examined for their relevance to this review. The information gathered was collated under various categories. Deficiencies of micronutrients, especially vitamins A, B complex, C, and D, zinc, iron, and selenium, are common among vulnerable populations in general and among COVID-19 patients in particular and could plausibly increase the risk of mortality. Judicious use of need-based micronutrient supplementation, alongside existing micronutrient fortification programs, is warranted in the current global pandemic, especially in low- and middle-income economies.

scholarly journals New Evidence Should Inform WHO Guidelines on Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation in Pregnancy

2019 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R Sudfeld ◽  
Emily R Smith
Keyword(s):  
Neonatal Mortality ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Micronutrient Supplementation ◽  
Who Guidelines ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Multiple Micronutrient ◽  
Iron And Folic Acid ◽  
New Evidence

ABSTRACT Recent data from an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of 17 randomized control trials including >100,000 women living in low- and middle-income countries found that multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) in pregnancy reduced the risk of low birth weight, preterm birth, and being born small for gestational age. Further, MMS reduced the risk of neonatal and infant mortality for females, and there was no evidence of increased risk among the 26 subgroups examined. The 2016 WHO antenatal care guidelines, which were released before the IPD meta-analysis, did not universally recommend MMS, noting: “There is some evidence of additional benefit … but there is also some evidence of risk.” The guidelines suggest that MMS may increase the risk of neonatal mortality based on an exploratory subgroup analysis of 6 randomized trials. However, we identified several issues with this subgroup analysis. In this report we correct and update the subgroup analysis and show that there is no evidence that MMS increases the risk of neonatal mortality. There is growing scientific consensus that MMS containing iron and folic acid (IFA) is superior to IFA alone. The WHO guidelines currently state that “policy-makers in populations with a high prevalence of nutritional deficiencies might consider the benefits of MMN [multiple micronutrient] supplements on maternal health to outweigh the disadvantages, and may choose to give MMN supplements that include iron and folic acid.” This equivocal guidance has created confusion about the best course of action for public health programs in low- and middle-income countries. Given the new evidence, WHO should review their statements regarding the potential neonatal mortality risks and re-evaluate the overall potential benefits of implementing MMS as a public health program.

Some Conditions for Task Shifting in Low and Middle-Income Countries

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joop de Jong ◽  
Mark Jordans ◽  
Ivan Komproe ◽  
Robert Macy ◽  
Aline & Herman Ndayisaba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Task Shifting ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document