Duloxetine Improves Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes for Chronic Pain

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarun Prabhala ◽  
Shelby Sabourin ◽  
Marisa DiMarzio ◽  
Michael Gillogly ◽  
Julia Prusik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation

Retrospective analysis on the effect of spinal cord stimulation on opioid consumption

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Awinita Barpujari ◽  
Michael A Erdek
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Alternative Therapy ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Chronic Pain Conditions ◽  
Post Trial

Aim: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used to clinically manage and/or treat several chronic pain etiologies. A limited amount is known about the influence on patients' use of opioid pain medication. This retrospective analysis evaluated SCS effect on opioid consumption in patients presenting with chronic pain conditions. Materials & methods: Sixty-seven patients underwent a temporary trial device, permanent implant or both. Patients were divided for assessment based on the nature of their procedure(s). Primary outcome was change in morphine equivalent dose (MED), ascertained from preoperative and postoperative medication reports. Results: Postoperative MED was significantly lower in patients who received some form of neuromodulation therapy. Pretrial patients reported an average MED of 41.01 ± 10.23 mg per day while post-trial patients reported an average of 13.30 ± 5.34 mg per day (p < 0.001). Pre-implant patients reported an average MED of 39.14 ± 13.52 mg per day while post-implant patients reported an average MED of 20.23 ± 9.01 mg per day (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between pre-trial and pre-implant MED, nor between post-trial and post-implant MED. Of the 42 study subjects who reported some amount of pre-intervention opioid use, 78.57% indicated a lower MED (n = 33; p < 0.001), 16.67% indicated no change (n = 7) and 4.76% (n = 2) indicated a higher MED, following intervention. Moreover, SCS therapy resulted in a 26.83% reduction (p < 0.001) in the number of patients with MED >50 mg per day. Conclusion: Spinal cord stimulation may reduce opioid use when implemented appropriately. Neuromodulation may represent alternative therapy for alleviating chronic pain which may avoid a number of deleterious side effects commonly associated with opioid consumption.

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Relief of Chronic Pain in Vasospastic Disorders of the Upper Limbs

1989 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 312
Author(s):  
F. J. ROBAINA ◽  
M. DOMINGUEZ ◽  
M. DIAZ ◽  
J. L. RODRIGUEZ ◽  
J. A. DE VERA
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Upper Limbs

Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Contemporary Series

Neurosurgery ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Spiegelmann ◽  
William A. Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Detailed Analysis ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Significant Pain ◽  
Experience Pain

Abstract Forty-three patients with chronic pain disorders of different causes were selected for spinal cord stimulation. All underwent implantation of a ribbon electrode through a small laminotomy, under general anesthesia. Thirteen patients (30%) failed to obtain significant pain relief during a period of trial stimulation, and their electrodes were removed. The remainder underwent a definitive implant and were followed for a mean of 13 months (range, 3-33 months). Nineteen of them (63%) continued to experience pain relief. A detailed analysis of this series, as well as a literature review, is presented.

scholarly journals High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Patient with Bilateral Cochlear Implants

2021 ◽  
pp. 189-191
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Pain Clinic ◽  
Bilateral Cochlear Implants ◽  
Patient Reported

BACKGROUND: High-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS) has become very popular in the management of chronic pain worldwide. As it relies on generating high-frequency electrical impulses, there is a risk of interference with other devices such as cochlear implants that utilize similar principles. A literature search did not reveal any case reports of HF-SCS implantation in a patient with cochlear implants. CASE REPORT: A 75-year-old White woman with a history of bilateral cochlear implants (Cochlear Americas Nucleus® with cp910 processor) for severe sensorineural hearing loss presented to our chronic pain clinic with lumbosacral radiculopathy. The patient underwent a HF-SCS trial with entry point at the L1-L2 space and the leads positioned at the top and bottom of T8. The patient did not experience any auditory interference with her Cochlear implant at triple the average SCS stimulation strength. During the follow-up visit the next week, the patient reported nearly 80% symptomatic pain relief and significant functional improvement. There was no change in her hearing and no evidence of interference. The patient ultimately underwent percutaneous SCS paddle electrode placement and at 3 months, continues to have excellent pain relief without any auditory interactions. CONCLUSION: We successfully implanted a HF-SCS at the thoracic level in a patient with bilateral cochlear implants without any auditory interference. KEY WORDS: Cochlear implant, lumbar radiculopathy, spinal cord stimulation

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain Relief: First Experience in Baltics

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-181
Author(s):  
Iveta Golubovska ◽  
Aleksejs Miscuks ◽  
Vitolds Jurkevics ◽  
Sarmite Skaida
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Neuropathic Pain Syndrome ◽  
Patient Status ◽  
First Case

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain Relief: First Experience in BalticsWe report the first case of spinal cord stimulator implantation in Baltics to patient with massive posttraumatic plexus lumbosacralis dxtr lesion, severe neuropathic pain syndrome and drug addiction problems. Follow-up time is 6 month since December 2011 and we have observed an obvious clinical and social improvement in patient status. Besides significant pain relief she has got employed and is tax payer instead of low-income person.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document