Cost-Effectiveness Modeling of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Compared to Electroconvulsive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Singapore

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 376-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Jiao Zhao ◽  
Phern Chern Tor ◽  
Ai Leng Khoo ◽  
Monica Teng ◽  
Boon Peng Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Electroconvulsive Therapy ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Resistant Depression

scholarly journals Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: the evidence thus far

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. e100074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Somani ◽  
Sujita Kumar Kar
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Electroconvulsive Therapy ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Antidepressant Treatment ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Common Mental Disorder ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Resistant Depression

Depression is a common mental disorder, which attributes to significant morbidity, disability and burden of care. A significant number of patients with depression still remain symptomatic after adequate trials of antidepressant treatment as well as psychotherapy, which is often referred to as treatment-resistant depression. Neuromodulation techniques—like electroconvulsive therapy, vagus nerve stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation, may be useful augmenting techniques in depression, mostly recommended for treatment-resistant cases. Robust evidence exists regarding the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in the management of treatment-resistant depression; however, other techniques are understudied. TMS has been increasingly studied in various psychiatric disorders including depression. It has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in major depressive disorder. Over the past two decades, TMS has been studied in diverse groups of the population with depression using several research designs. This article gives an overview of the efficacy of repetitive TMS in treatment-resistant depression with the recent evidence.

The priming effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on clinical response to electroconvulsive therapy in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Maud Rothärmel ◽  
Pierre Quesada ◽  
Thomas Husson ◽  
Ghina Harika-Germaneau ◽  
Clément Nathou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Electroconvulsive Therapy ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Priming Effect ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Resistant Depression

Abstract Background Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is one of the most effective treatments for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, due to response delay and cognitive impairment, ECT remains an imperfect treatment. Compared to ECT, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is less effective at treating severe depression, but has the advantage of being quick, easy to use, and producing almost no side effects. In this study, our objective was to assess the priming effect of rTMS sessions before ECT on clinical response in patients with TRD. Methods In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial, 56 patients with TRD were assigned to active or sham rTMS before ECT treatment. Five sessions of active/sham neuronavigated rTMS were administered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (20 Hz, 90% resting motor threshold, 20 2 s trains with 60-s intervals, 800 pulses/session) before ECT (which was active for all patients) started. Any relative improvements were then compared between both groups after five ECT sessions, in order to assess the early response to treatment. Results After ECT, the active rTMS group exhibited a significantly greater relative improvement than the sham group [43.4% (28.6%) v. 25.4% (17.2%)]. The responder rate in the active group was at least three times higher. Cognitive complaints, which were assessed using the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, were higher in the sham rTMS group compared to the active rTMS group, but this difference was not corroborated by cognitive tests. Conclusions rTMS could be used to enhance the efficacy of ECT in patients with TRD. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02830399.

scholarly journals Long-Term Efficacy of Combination Therapy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Ketamine for Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-171
Author(s):  
Steve Best ◽  
Dan G. Pavel ◽  
Natalie Haustrup
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Nmda Receptor Antagonist ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Resistant Depression

AbstractBackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a safe, effective and non-invasive treatment for many psychiatric illnesses, including treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Ketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, is also an effective antidepressant. This retrospective review examined the clinical benefits of combining these two established treatments for patients suffering from TRD in a novel approach coined combination TMS with ketamine (CTK).MethodsA group of 28 adult patients with a primary diagnosis of unipolar (n=18) or bipolar (n=10) depression received three CTK treatments a week at a private neuropsychiatric practice. Patients were given a concurrent treatment of rTMS (1Hz; 40 minutes; 130% of motor threshold) with bio-marker-determined IV ketamine infusions (0.2–4.7 mg/kg; 30 minutes). The TMS coil was positioned on the mid-prefrontal area. Frequency of treatment was dependent on patient responsiveness (10–30 sessions), which was measured as symptom reduction on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. CGI data was evaluated pre-treatment, post-treatment and at two-year follow-up.ResultsMean reduction in CGI severity for the patient group following CTK was 4.46 ± 0.54 at a 99% confidence interval and was deemed statistically significant using a paired t-test (a=0.01, t=22.81, p < 0.0001). This significant reduction in CGI severity was sustained for at least 2 years following treatment completion.ConclusionsDespite years of unsuccessful treatments, all 28 patients in this trial obtained substantial and enduring reductions in their depressive symptoms following CTK therapy. Further research into method optimization and randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document