Association between early worsening of kidney function and poor outcomes in patients treated with renin angiotensin system inhibitors: A meta‐analysis

Nephrology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shizhu Yuan ◽  
Yueming Liu ◽  
Wenfang He ◽  
Juan Jin ◽  
Lin Liu ◽  
...  
PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e11661
Author(s):  
Zhihao Huo ◽  
Huizhen Ye ◽  
Peiyi Ye ◽  
Guanqing Xiao ◽  
Zhe Zhang ◽  
...  

Background IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is still one of the most prevalent forms of primary glomerulonephritis globally. However, no guidelines have clearly indicated which kinds of renin angiotensin system blockade therapies (ACEIs or ARBs or their combination) in patients with IgAN result in a greater reduction in proteinuria and a better preservation of kidney function. Thus, we conducted a Bayesian network analysis to evaluate the relative effects of these three therapy regimens in patients with IgAN. Methods The protocol was registered in PROSPERO with ID CRD42017073726. We comprehensively searched the PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, China Biology Medicine disc, WanFang and CNKI databases for studies published since 1993 as well as some grey literature according to PICOS strategies. Pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network analysis were conducted to evaluate the effect of different regimens. Results Seventeen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1,006 patients were analyzed. Co-administration of ACEIs and ARBs had the highest probability (92%) of being the most effective therapy for reducing proteinuria and blood pressure, but ACEIs would be the most appropriate choice for protecting kidney function in IgAN. Conclusion The combination of ACEIs and ARBs seems to have a significantly better antiproteinuric effect and a greater reduction of blood pressure than ACEI or ARB monotherapy in IgAN. ACEIs appear to be a more renoprotective therapy regimen among three therapies.


Author(s):  
James Phie ◽  
Shivshankar Thanigaimani ◽  
Jonathan Golledge

Objective: There are no current effective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) drug therapies. An important limitation of most preclinical studies is that they test the effect of drugs on AAA formation rather than AAA progression. The aim of this study was to systematically review AAA mouse model studies that have tested the effect of interventions in limiting the progression of preestablished AAA. Approach and Results: The literature search identified 35 studies meeting eligibility, and 30 (n=935 mice) contributed to the meta-analyses. AAAs were induced with angiotensin II (n=745 mice), calcium chloride (n=91 mice), or elastase (n=99 mice). Anti-inflammatory drugs (standardized mean difference [SMD], 1.62 [95% CI, 0.93–2.30]), protease inhibitors (SMD, 1.23 [95% CI, 0.52–1.95]), stem cells (SMD, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.05–2.24]), antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs (SMD, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.63–1.22]), and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (SMD, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.58–2.33]) reduced AAA diameter. Interventions initiated soon after model induction commenced were more likely to reduce AAA diameter (R 2 , 16%; P =0.007). Funnel plots suggested possible publication bias. Most studies did not report blinding or sample size calculations, and the risk of bias was considered medium or high in 20 (57%) of the 35 studies. Conclusions: There is low-quality evidence that a range of drugs are effective in limiting AAA progression when administered early after AAA induction in mouse models. Some of these drugs, such as antiplatelet and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, have been reported to be ineffective in clinical trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document