scholarly journals Epidemiology and management burden of invasive fungal infections after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: 10‐year experience at a European Pediatric Cancer Center

Mycoses ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 954-960
Author(s):  
Christina Linke ◽  
Athanasios Tragiannidis ◽  
Martina Ahlmann ◽  
Birgit Fröhlich ◽  
Maria Wältermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Pediatric Cancer ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Invasive Fungal Infections ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

scholarly journals Primary or Secondary Prophylaxis with Voriconazole Compared with Posaconazole for Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S75-S75
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W Jansen ◽  
Anupam Pande ◽  
Rizwan Romee ◽  
Steven J Lawrence ◽  
William Powderly
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Antifungal Prophylaxis ◽  
Invasive Fungal Infections ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Invasive fungal infections (IFI) remain a serious complication in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients and are associated with increased costs, morbidity, and mortality. Posaconazole (PCZ) and voriconazole (VCZ) are frequently utilized as antifungal prophylaxis in this population. To date, no direct comparison between PCZ and VCZ exists for the prevention of IFI in adult HSCT patients. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis of HSCT patients aged ≥18 years who received ≥28 continuous days of primary (PPPx) or secondary (SPPx) antifungal prophylaxis with either VCZ or PCZ between February 26, 2003 and September 30, 2015 at Barnes-Jewish Hospital was conducted. Patients who received PPPx or SPPx with both VCZ and PCZ were analyzed following intention to treat of the initial agent received. Patients who received both PPPx and SPPx were included once for both PPPx and SPPx. The primary outcome of interest was development of possible, probable, or proven IFI as defined by EORTC/MSG guidelines. In the SPPx patients, development of IFI was confirmed as a distinct event from primary IFI based on manual chart review and radiographic evidence. Results Overall, there were 472 patients included; 402 in the VCZ group and 70 in the PCZ group. At baseline, patients in the PCZ group had more graft vs. host disease (GVHD) prior to prophylaxis (27.1% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.04) and were more likely to be on SPPx (60% vs. 41%, P < 0.01). There were 22 and 1 IFI events in the VCZ and PCZ groups, respectively, which corresponded to a crude incidence rate of 0.345 and 0.077 per 1000 person-days of prophylaxis. Figure 1 displays the Cox proportional hazard model which was completed in the backwards stepwise method accounting for gender, transplant type, GVHD prior to prophylaxis, disease remission, and PPPx or SPPX. The hazard ratio for development of IFI while on prophylaxis between VCZ and PCZ was 5.22 (95% CI: 0.69–39.4; P = 0.11) after controlling for PPPx or SPPx. Conclusion There was not a significant difference between rates of IFI in HSCT patients who received antifungal prophylaxis with VCZ compared with PCZ. Our data trends towards favoring PCZ but is limited by low rates of IFI. Larger, prospective analyses are necessary to confirm our findings. Disclosures W. Powderly, Merck: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research grant. Gilead: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Astellas: Grant Investigator, Research grant

Micafungin Versus Fluconazole Or Itraconazole For Prophylaxis Against Invasive Fungal Infections During Neutropenia In Patients Undergoing Haplo-Identical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4564-4564
Author(s):  
el-Cheikh Jean ◽  
Crocchiolo Roberto ◽  
Fürst Sabine ◽  
Bramanti Stefania ◽  
Sarina Barbara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Invasive Aspergillosis ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Invasive Fungal Infections ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Objectives Over the past decade, invasive fungal infections (IFI) have remained an important problem in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The optimal approach for prophylactic antifungal therapy has yet to be determined. Patients and Methods we conducted a retrospective, bi-institutional comparative clinical study, (Institut Paoli-Calmettes at Marseille France and Humanitas cancer center at Rozzano, Italy), and we compared the efficacy and safety of Micafungin 50mg/day (iv) with those of fluconazole (400mg/day) or itraconazole 200mg/day (iv) as prophylaxis for adult patients with various haematological diseases receiving haplo-identical allogeneic stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT). Patients received prophylaxis with the beginning of the transplant conditioning regimen until the hospital discharge, or until occurrence of an IFI. We compared the incidence of proven or probable IFI (the primary end point) between the micafungin and fluconazole or itraconazole groups; death from any cause and time to death was secondary end points. Patients were followed for 100 days after haplo-SCT and for 30 days after the last dose of the prophylaxis drug administrated. Results From January 2009 to May 2013, a total of 99 patients were identified; 30 patients received micafungin, and 69 patients received fluconazole or itraconazole. 81 patients (82%) received a non myeloabaltive conditioning regimen (NMA), with Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide and Total body irradiation (TBI) 2 Gy based , or Fludarabine, Busulfan, and Cyclophosphamide based (3%) or other (9%), while five patients (5%) received a thiotepa-based conditioning regimen. The patients and transplant details are shown in the table 1. Proven or probable invasive fungal infections were reported in 2 patients (7%) in the micafungin group and 8 patients (12%) in the fluconazole or itraconazole group (absolute reduction in the micafungin group, −5%; 95% confidence interval, 0.0565-3.1395, P=0.72). Fewer patients in the micafungin group had invasive aspergillosis (1 [3%] vs. 5 [7%], P=0.6). A total of 4 (13%) patients in the micafungin group and 23 (33%) patients in the fluconazole or itraconazole group received empirical antifungal therapy (P = 0.14). No serious adverse events related to treatment were reported by patients and there was no treatment discontinuation because of drug related adverse event in both groups. Overall Survival and disease free survival were similar among the two groups (P = 0.97). 6 patients (20%) in the micafungin group died within 100 days, as did 10 patients (14%) in the fluconazole or itraconazole group (P = 0.57). Interestingly the transplant related mortality (TRM) at 100 days was 0% in the micafungin group vs 13% in the second group [CI 95% (0-22)] (p=0,06), whereas the relapse or progression rate at 100 days was 27% vs. 8% respectively [CI 95% (14-44)] (p=0,14). Conclusions In patients undergoing to haplo-SCT, antifungal prophylaxis with micafungin is well tolerated and effective to prevent IFI. Furthermore, the incidence of IFI and invasive aspergillosis seems lower even if this did not attend statistical power, probably due to low number of patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals The safety of interferon-?-1b therapy for invasive fungal infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cancer ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 731-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amar Safdar ◽  
Gilhen Rodriguez ◽  
Norio Ohmagari ◽  
Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis ◽  
Kenneth V. Rolston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Invasive Fungal Infections ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

scholarly journals Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infections in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 347
Author(s):  
Carmine Liberatore ◽  
Francesca Farina ◽  
Raffaella Greco ◽  
Fabio Giglio ◽  
Daniela Clerici ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Antifungal Prophylaxis ◽  
Invasive Fungal Infections ◽  
Preemptive Therapy ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Despite the recent introduction of mold-active antifungal prophylaxis (MAP), breakthrough invasive fungal infections (b-IFI) still represent a possible complication and a cause of morbidity and mortality in hematological patients and allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients (HSCT). Data on incidence and type of b-IFI are limited, although they are mainly caused by non-fumigatus Aspergillus and non-Aspergillus molds and seem to depend on specific antifungal prophylaxis and patients’ characteristics. Herein, we described the clinical presentation and management of two cases of rare b-IFI which recently occurred at our institution in patients undergoing HSCT and receiving MAP. The management of b-IFI is challenging due to the lack of data from prospective trials and high mortality rates. A thorough analysis of risk factors, ongoing antifungal prophylaxis, predisposing conditions and local epidemiology should drive the choice of antifungal treatments. Early broad-spectrum preemptive therapy with a lipid formulation of amphotericin-B, in combination with a different mold-active azole plus/minus terbinafine, is advisable. The therapy would cover against rare azole-susceptible and -resistant fungal strains, as well as atypical sites of infections. An aggressive diagnostic work-up is recommended for species identification and subsequent targeted therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document