Deep learning–based nondestructive evaluation of reinforcement bars using ground‐penetrating radar and electromagnetic induction data

Author(s):  
Xiaofeng Li ◽  
Hai Liu ◽  
Feng Zhou ◽  
Zhongchang Chen ◽  
Iraklis Giannakis ◽  
...  
Geoderma ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 207-208 ◽  
pp. 310-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Jonard ◽  
Mohammad Mahmoudzadeh ◽  
Christian Roisin ◽  
Lutz Weihermüller ◽  
Frédéric André ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Siyu Chen ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Zheng Fang ◽  
Zhensheng Shi ◽  
Anxue Zhang

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 844-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan van der Kruk ◽  
Nils Gueting ◽  
Anja Klotzsche ◽  
Guowei He ◽  
Sebastian Rudolph ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 675 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Gomez-Ortiz ◽  
Isabel Blanco-Montenegro ◽  
Jose Arnoso ◽  
Tomas Martin-Crespo ◽  
Mercedes Solla ◽  
...  

Convective hydrothermal systems have been extensively studied using electrical and electromagnetic methods given the strong correlation between low conductivity anomalies associated with hydrothermal brines and high temperature areas. However, studies addressing the application of similar geophysical methods to hot dry rock geothermal systems are very limited in the literature. The Timanfaya volcanic area, located on Lanzarote Island (Canary Islands), comprises one of these hot dry rock systems, where ground temperatures ranging from 250 to 605 °C have been recorded in pyroclastic deposits at shallow (<70 m) depths. With the aim of characterizing the geophysical signature of the high ground temperature areas, three different geophysical techniques (ground penetrating radar, electromagnetic induction and magnetic prospecting) were applied in a well-known geothermal area located inside Timanfaya National Park. The area with the highest ground temperatures was correlated with the location that exhibited strong ground penetrating radar reflections, high resistivity values and low magnetic anomalies. Moreover, the high ground temperature imaging results depicted a shallow, bowl-shaped body that narrowed and deepened vertically to a depth greater than 45 m. The ground penetrating radar survey was repeated three years later and exhibited subtle variations of the signal reflection patterns, or signatures, suggesting a certain temporal variation of the ground temperature. By identifying similar areas with the same geophysical signature, up to four additional geothermal areas were revealed. We conclude that the combined use of ground penetrating radar, electromagnetic induction and magnetic methods constitutes a valuable tool to locate and study both the geometry at depth and seasonal variability of geothermal areas associated with hot dry rock systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document