An efficient algorithm for architecture design of Bayesian neural network in structural model updating

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-372
Author(s):  
Tao Yin ◽  
Hong‐Ping Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Efficient Algorithm ◽  
Structural Model ◽  
Model Updating ◽  
Architecture Design ◽  
Bayesian Neural Network

scholarly journals BNNpriors: A library for Bayesian neural network inference with different prior distributions

2021 ◽  
pp. 100079
Author(s):  
Vincent Fortuin ◽  
Adrià Garriga-Alonso ◽  
Mark van der Wilk ◽  
Laurence Aitchison
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Network Inference ◽  
Bayesian Neural Network ◽  
Prior Distributions

scholarly journals Fast Accurate and Automatic Brushstroke Extraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Yunfei Fu ◽  
Hongchuan Yu ◽  
Chih-Kuo Yeh ◽  
Tong-Yee Lee ◽  
Jian J. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Efficient Algorithm ◽  
Deep Neural Network ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
The Other ◽  
Manual Annotation ◽  
Stroke Extraction ◽  
Art Research

Brushstrokes are viewed as the artist’s “handwriting” in a painting. In many applications such as style learning and transfer, mimicking painting, and painting authentication, it is highly desired to quantitatively and accurately identify brushstroke characteristics from old masters’ pieces using computer programs. However, due to the nature of hundreds or thousands of intermingling brushstrokes in the painting, it still remains challenging. This article proposes an efficient algorithm for brush Stroke extraction based on a Deep neural network, i.e., DStroke. Compared to the state-of-the-art research, the main merit of the proposed DStroke is to automatically and rapidly extract brushstrokes from a painting without manual annotation, while accurately approximating the real brushstrokes with high reliability. Herein, recovering the faithful soft transitions between brushstrokes is often ignored by the other methods. In fact, the details of brushstrokes in a master piece of painting (e.g., shapes, colors, texture, overlaps) are highly desired by artists since they hold promise to enhance and extend the artists’ powers, just like microscopes extend biologists’ powers. To demonstrate the high efficiency of the proposed DStroke, we perform it on a set of real scans of paintings and a set of synthetic paintings, respectively. Experiments show that the proposed DStroke is noticeably faster and more accurate at identifying and extracting brushstrokes, outperforming the other methods.

COMPARISON OF SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES AND BAYESIAN NEURAL NETWORKS PERFORMANCE FOR BREAST TISSUES USING GEOSTATISTICAL FUNCTIONS IN MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGES

2010 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 271-288
Author(s):  
GERALDO BRAZ JUNIOR ◽  
LEONARDO DE OLIVEIRA MARTINS ◽  
ARISTÓFANES CORREA SILVA ◽  
ANSELMO CARDOSO PAIVA
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Neural Networks ◽  
Region Of Interest ◽  
Female Breast Cancer ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Risk Minimization ◽  
Bayesian Neural Network ◽  
Cad System ◽  
Mammographic Images ◽  
Breast Tissues

Female breast cancer is a major cause of deaths in occidental countries. Computer-aided Detection (CAD) systems can aid radiologists to increase diagnostic accuracy. In this work, we present a comparison between two classifiers applied to the separation of normal and abnormal breast tissues from mammograms. The purpose of the comparison is to select the best prediction technique to be part of a CAD system. Each region of interest is classified through a Support Vector Machine (SVM) and a Bayesian Neural Network (BNN) as normal or abnormal region. SVM is a machine-learning method, based on the principle of structural risk minimization, which shows good performance when applied to data outside the training set. A Bayesian Neural Network is a classifier that joins traditional neural networks theory and Bayesian inference. We use a set of measures obtained by the application of the semivariogram, semimadogram, covariogram, and correlogram functions to the characterization of breast tissue as normal or abnormal. The results show that SVM presents best performance for the classification of breast tissues in mammographic images. The tests indicate that SVM has more generalization power than the BNN classifier. BNN has a sensibility of 76.19% and a specificity of 79.31%, while SVM presents a sensibility of 74.07% and a specificity of 98.77%. The accuracy rate for tests is 78.70% and 92.59% for BNN and SVM, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document