scholarly journals Training future physician leaders in the COVID‐19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Asghar Hayat ◽  
Mitra Amini ◽  
Parinaz Tabari ◽  
Mahsa Moosavi
Keyword(s):  
Physician Leaders ◽  
Future Physician

High-Performance Teams for Current and Future Physician Leaders: An Introduction

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anshu K. Jain ◽  
Jon M. Thompson ◽  
Joseph Chaudry ◽  
Shaun McKenzie ◽  
Richard W. Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
High Performance ◽  
Physician Leaders ◽  
Performance Teams ◽  
Future Physician

scholarly journals The future of clinical leadership: evidence for physician leadership and the educational pathway for new leaders

BMJ Leader ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 8-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Goodall ◽  
James K Stoller
Keyword(s):  
Educational Opportunities ◽  
Organisational Performance ◽  
Physician Leadership ◽  
Leadership And Management ◽  
Clinical Leadership ◽  
Core Business ◽  
The Core ◽  
Physician Leaders ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Future Physician

Until recently, the title ‘physician leader’ was rarely heard particularly in the UK. But that is changing. Doctors are being drawn into leadership and management more systematically. New educational opportunities are being tailored to the specific needs of doctors. The change towards physician leadership is being driven by research showing that leaders who are experts in the core business, such as doctors, are associated with improved organisational performance. This article summarises that evidence and then reviews what we have learnt about how best to train future physician leaders.

scholarly journals Physician leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic: an emphasis on the team, well-being and leadership reasoning

BMJ Leader ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. leader-2020-000344
Author(s):  
Taylor C. Standiford ◽  
Kavya Davuluri ◽  
Nicole Trupiano ◽  
David Portney ◽  
Larry Gruppen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Academic Medicine ◽  
Leadership Skills ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Crisis Leadership ◽  
Leadership Skill ◽  
Leadership Practice ◽  
Semistructured Interviews ◽  
Physician Leaders ◽  
Learning From Others ◽  
Leadership Skill Development

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic impacted many aspects of normal operations in academic medicine. While effective leadership is always important, the intensity and urgency of COVID-19 challenged academic medicine leaders to find new ways to lead their institutions and manage their own experiences of the pandemic.MethodsSixteen physician leaders from Michigan Medicine took part in semistructured interviews during April and May 2020. Participants were asked open-ended questions about the attributes and techniques that were important to effectively lead during a crisis. The authors analysed the interviews using thematic analysis.ResultsParticipants described three overarching themes of leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) bringing together a diverse team with clear, shared goals; (2) using a range of strategies to tend to their teams’—as well as their own—well-being; and (3) engaging in leadership reasoning as a way of learning from others and reflecting on their own actions to inform their future leadership practice.ConclusionThe results of this study reveal several salient themes of crisis leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings also highlight the role of leadership reasoning, a reflective practice employed by leaders to understand and improve their leadership skills. This finding presents leadership skill development as part of lifelong learning in medicine. Findings may be incorporated into best practices and preparations to inform future healthcare leaders.

First and foremost, physicians: the clinical versus leadership identities of physician leaders

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 711-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joann Farrell Quinn ◽  
Sheri Perelli
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Leadership Role ◽  
Organizational Level ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Physician Leadership ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Physician Leaders

Purpose – Physicians are commonly promoted into administrative and managerial roles in US hospitals on the basis of clinical expertise and often lack the skills, training or inclination to lead. Several studies have sought to identify factors associated with effective physician leadership, yet we know little about how physician leaders themselves construe their roles. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Phenomenological interviews were performed with 25 physicians at three organizational levels with physicians affiliated or employed by four hospitals within one health care organization in the USA between August and September 2010. A rigorous comparative methodology of data collection and analysis was employed, including the construction of analytic codes for the data and its categorization based on emergent ideas and themes that are not preconceived and logically deduced hypotheses, which is characteristic of grounded theory. Findings – These interviews reveal differences in how part- vs full-time physician leaders understand and value leadership roles vs clinical roles, claim leadership status, and identify as physician leaders on individual, relational and organizational basis. Research limitations/implications – Although the physicians in the sample were affiliated with four community hospitals, all of them were part of a single not-for-profit health care system in one geographical locale. Practical implications – These findings may be of interest to hospital administrators and boards seeking deeper commitment and higher performance from physician leaders, as well as assist physicians in transitioning into a leadership role. Social implications – This work points to a broader and more fundamental need – a modified mindset about the nature and value of physician leadership. Originality/value – This study is unique in the exploration of the nature of physician leadership from the perspective of the physician on an individual, peer and organizational level in the creation of their own leadership identity.

Building community during the COVID-19 pandemic: a system level approach to physician well-being

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 166-170
Author(s):  
Serena Siow ◽  
Carmen Gittens
Keyword(s):  
Emotional Health ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Shared Responsibility ◽  
System Level ◽  
Group Discussions ◽  
Physician Wellness ◽  
Physician Leaders ◽  
Building Community ◽  
Support Team ◽  
Emotional Strain

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, physician burnout was identified as reaching crisis proportions, and the pandemic is expected to worsen the already perilous state of physician wellness. It has affected physicians’ emotional health, not only by increasing workload demands, but also by eroding resilience under increasing pressures. The mental health consequences are expected to persist long after the pandemic subsides. With physician wellness increasingly recognized as a shared responsibility between individual physicians and the health care system, system-level approaches have been identified as important interventions for addressing physician well-being. In this article, we describe two evidence-guided initiatives implemented in our hospitalist network during the current pandemic: a trained peer-support team and facilitated physician online group discussions. These initiatives acknowledge the emotional strain of physicians’ work and challenge the “iron doc” culture of medicine. Our efforts build community and shift culture toward improved physician wellness. We suggest that the pandemic might be an opportunity for our profession to strengthen our support networks and for physician leaders to advance physician wellness in their work environments.

scholarly journals The future physician

1981 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 381-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Barondess
Keyword(s):  
The Future ◽  
Future Physician

scholarly journals Fostering the Next Generation of Primary Care Physician Leaders

2010 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 931
Author(s):  
Jeffrey F. Markuns ◽  
Larry Culpepper ◽  
William J. Halpin
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Physician Leaders

Competencies physicians need to lead – a Canadian case

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Comber ◽  
Kyle Clayton Crawford ◽  
Lisette Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Financial Literacy ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Leadership Skills ◽  
Physician Leadership ◽  
Current Form ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Business Skills ◽  
Canadian Physician ◽  
Physician Leaders ◽  
Systems Transformation

Purpose Emerging evidence correlates increased physician leadership effectiveness with improved patient and healthcare system outcomes. To maximize this benefit, it is critical to understand current physician leadership needs. The purpose of this study is to understand, through physicians’ self-reporting, their own and others’ most effective and weakest leadership skills in relation to the LEADS leadership capabilities framework. Design/methodology/approach The authors surveyed 209 Canadian physician leaders about their perceptions of their own and other physicians’ leadership abilities. Thematic analysis was used, and the results were coded deductively into the five LEADS categories, and new categories emerging from inductive coding were added. Findings The authors found that leaders need more skills in the areas of Engage Others and Lead Self, and an emergent category of Business Skills, which includes financial competency, budgeting, facilitation, etc. Further, Achieve Results, Develop Coalitions and Systems Transformation are skills least reported as needed in both self and others. Originality/value The authors conclude that LEADS, in its current form, has a gap in the competencies prescribed, namely, “Business Skills”. They recommend the development of a more comprehensive LEADS framework that includes such skills as financial literacy/competency, budgeting, facilitation, etc. The authors also found that certain dimensions of LEADS are being overlooked by physicians in terms of importance (Systems Transformation, Achieve Results, Develop Coalitions), and this warrants greater investigation into the reasons why these skills are not as important as the others (Engage Others and Lead Self).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document