scholarly journals Generalized statistical arbitrage concepts and related gain strategies

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 563-594
Author(s):  
Christian Rein ◽  
Ludger Rüschendorf ◽  
Thorsten Schmidt
CFA Digest ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-84
Author(s):  
Robert Fernholz ◽  
Cary Maguire

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ainhoa Fernández-Pérez ◽  
María de las Nieves López-García ◽  
José Pedro Ramos Requena

In this paper we present a non-conventional statistical arbitrage technique based in varying the number of standard deviations used to carry the trading strategy. We will show how values of 1 and 1,2 in the standard deviation provide better results that the classic strategy of Gatev et al (2006). An empirical application is performance using data of the FST100 index during the period 2010 to June 2019.


2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir H. Alizadeh ◽  
Nikos K. Nomikos

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
Fabian Waldow ◽  
Matthias Schnaubelt ◽  
Christopher Krauss ◽  
Thomas Günter Fischer

In this paper, we demonstrate how a well-established machine learning-based statistical arbitrage strategy can be successfully transferred from equity to futures markets. First, we preprocess futures time series comprised of front months to render them suitable for our returns-based trading framework and compile a data set comprised of 60 futures covering nearly 10 trading years. Next, we train several machine learning models to predict whether the h-day-ahead return of each future out- or underperforms the corresponding cross-sectional median return. Finally, we enter long/short positions for the top/flop-k futures for a duration of h days and assess the financial performance of the resulting portfolio in an out-of-sample testing period. Thereby, we find the machine learning models to yield statistically significant out-of-sample break-even transaction costs of 6.3 bp—a clear challenge to the semi-strong form of market efficiency. Finally, we discuss sources of profitability and the robustness of our findings.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Paul A. Griffin ◽  
Mohammedi Padaria

The purpose of this paper is to examine how firms’ information landscape has changed in recent years and why this could be problematic for those engaged in financial analysis and equity valuation. Our central contention is that two main forces of change – lower information costs and faster information processing – have completely disrupted the traditional concept of financial analysis. In response to this disruption, financial analysis will now increasingly take the form of “reactive valuation.” In addition to examining our main contention, we introduce a new term into the literature, called “reactive valuation,” which we define as the ultra short-term valuation of an equity, lasting from a few seconds to a few hours, based on information primarily published through social media channels. It may be later corroborated by factually based information or remain unsubstantiated. It may or may not be from an authoritative source. It also may not relate clearly or directly to the valuation of the underlying asset. However, based mostly on the tools of artificial intelligence and natural language processing, “reactive valuation” will invariably provide an opportunity for statistical arbitrage during the short time it takes for the market to digest the information. Financial analysts who survive these two forces of change will have detailed knowledge of this new form of financial analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document