Transient elastography: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy in evaluation of portal hypertension in chronic liver disease

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke-Qing Shi ◽  
Yu-Chen Fan ◽  
Zhen-Zhen Pan ◽  
Xian-Feng Lin ◽  
Wen-Yue Liu ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Xing Hu ◽  
Xiaojie Huang ◽  
Jianhua Hou ◽  
Lei Ding ◽  
Chunling Su ◽  
...  

The original version of this article, published on 24 September 2020, unfortunately contained a mistake.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (05) ◽  
pp. 526-533
Author(s):  
Horia Stefanescu ◽  
Corina Rusu ◽  
Monica Lupsor-Platon ◽  
Oana Nicoara Farcau ◽  
Petra Fischer ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is responsible for most of the complications in patients with cirrhosis. Liver stiffness (LS) measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is currently used to evaluate CSPH. Bi-dimensional shear wave elastography from General Electric (2D-SWE.GE) has not yet been validated for the diagnosis of PHT. Our aims were to test whether 2D-SWE.GE-LS is able to evaluate CSPH, to determine the reliability criteria of the method and to compare its accuracy with that of VCTE-LS in this clinical setting. Materials and Methods Patients with chronic liver disease referred to hepatic catheterization (HVPG) were consecutively enrolled. HVPG and LS by both VCTE and 2D-SWE.GE were performed on the same day. The diagnostic performance of each LS method was compared against HVPG and between each other. Results 2D-SWE.GE-LS was possible in 123/127 (96.90 %) patients. The ability to record at least 5 LS measurements by 2D-SWE.GE and IQR < 30 % were the only features associated with reliable results. 2D-SWE.GE-LS was highly correlated with HVPG (r = 0.704; p < 0.0001), especially if HVPG < 10 mmHg and was significantly higher in patients with CSPH (15.52 vs. 8.14 kPa; p < 0.0001). For a cut-off value of 11.3 kPa, the AUROC of 2D-SWE.GE-LS to detect CSPH was 0.91, which was not inferior to VCTE-LS (0.92; p = 0.79). The diagnostic accuracy of LS by 2D-SWE.GE-LS to detect CSPH was similar with the one of VCTE-LS (83.74 % vs. 85.37 %; p = 0.238). The diagnostic accuracy was not enhanced by using different cut-off values which enhanced the sensitivity or the specificity. However, in the subgroup of compensated patients with alcoholic liver disease, 2D-SWE.GE-LS classified CSPH better than VCTE-LS (93.33 % vs. 85.71 %, p = 0.039). Conclusion 2D-SWE.GE-LS has good accuracy, not inferior to VCTE-LS, for the diagnosis of CSPH.


2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 650-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Tsochatzis ◽  
K.S. Gurusamy ◽  
S. Ntaoula ◽  
E. Cholongitas ◽  
B.R. Davidson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document