scholarly journals Pre-service Teachers’ Interpretation of CBM Progress Monitoring Data

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana L. Wagner ◽  
Stephanie M. Hammerschmidt-Snidarich ◽  
Christine A. Espin ◽  
Kathleen Seifert ◽  
Kristen L. McMaster
Keyword(s):  
Progress Monitoring ◽  
Monitoring Data

Estimating Trend in Progress Monitoring Data: A Comparison of Simple Line-Fitting Methods

1992 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 300-312
Author(s):  
Richard Parker ◽  
Gerald Tindal ◽  
Stephanie Stein
Keyword(s):  
Progress Monitoring ◽  
Monitoring Data ◽  
Line Fitting

Decision-Making Accuracy of CBM Progress-Monitoring Data

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Hintze ◽  
Craig S. Wells ◽  
Amanda M. Marcotte ◽  
Benjamin G. Solomon
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Progress Monitoring ◽  
Monitoring Data ◽  
Standard Errors ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Curriculum Based Measurement ◽  
Reading Growth ◽  
Intervention Model ◽  
Student Reading ◽  
Decision Making Rule

This study examined the diagnostic accuracy associated with decision making as is typically conducted with curriculum-based measurement (CBM) approaches to progress monitoring. Using previously published estimates of the standard errors of estimate associated with CBM, 20,000 progress-monitoring data sets were simulated to model student reading growth of two-word increase per week across 15 consecutive weeks. Results indicated that an unacceptably high proportion of cases were falsely identified as nonresponsive to intervention when a common 4-point decision rule was applied, under the context of typical levels of probe reliability. As reliability and stringency of the decision-making rule increased, such errors decreased. Findings are particularly relevant to those who use a multi-tiered response-to-intervention model for evaluating formative changes associated with instructional intervention and evaluating responsiveness to intervention across multiple tiers of intervention.

Decision-making accuracy of CBM progress-monitoring data

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Hintze ◽  
Craig S. Wells ◽  
Amanda M. Marcotte
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Progress Monitoring ◽  
Monitoring Data

Comparison of progress monitoring data from general outcome measures and specific subskill mastery measures for reading

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 179-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan R. Van Norman ◽  
Kathrin E. Maki ◽  
Matthew K. Burns ◽  
Jennifer J. McComas ◽  
Lori Helman
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Progress Monitoring ◽  
Monitoring Data ◽  
General Outcome ◽  
General Outcome Measures
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document