scholarly journals Effectiveness of fecal microbiota transplant for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile diarrhea: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Ángel Pomares Bascuñana ◽  
Veronica Veses ◽  
Chirag C Sheth
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fecal Microbiota ◽  
Fecal Microbiota Transplant ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile

scholarly journals 2434. Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplant Administered by Trans-Oral Routes for Clostridioides Difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S841-S842
Author(s):  
Annie S Hong ◽  
Wen Yuan Yu ◽  
Jenny M Hong ◽  
Mohamed Azab ◽  
Gordon V Ohning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Proton Pump ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Fecal Microbiota ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Fecal Microbiota Transplant ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Current guidelines include fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in the management of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI). However, FMT protocols are often facility dependent, and one variable is whether proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are given during preparation. Theoretically, PPIs reduce acidity and protects the transplanted microbiome for the most potent dose. On the other hand, PPIs have also been shown to negatively alter the microbiome and increase the risk of CDI. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to study PPI use on the efficacy of FMT delivered by the trans-oral route. Methods We searched PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science through December 16th, 2018 using variations of keywords “fecal microbiota transplant” and “Clostridium difficile infection” with 4210 results. Two independent authors reviewed and excluded studies with unrelated topics, abstracts, case reports, or a low level of evidence. Studies with data on trans-oral FMT, PPI use, and the success rate were included. Final review yielded 11 studies including randomized controlled, case–control, cohort, retrospective and prospective trials. The primary outcome was the rate of FMT failure, defined as recurrence of symptoms with positive CDI testing at follow-up. Results Out of 233 included patients, 131 received a PPI per FMT protocol resulting in 27 cases of treatment failure. There were 23 cases of recurrence out of 102 patients who did not receive pre-FMT PPI. The primary outcome occurred in 20.6% in the group with PPI use vs. 22.6% in the group without (RR 0.91; CI 0.56 - 1.50). Limitations include the lack of studies directly comparing outcomes with respect to PPI use, and inability to control possible confounders such as chronic PPI use, amount of stool transplanted, and pre-FMT antibiotics. Conclusion We did not find a significant difference in efficacy between FMT protocols with regard to PPI use. It is possible that the theoretical benefit from increased survival of transplanted microbiota is offset by negative effects associated with PPIs. We suggest that routine use of PPIs in FMT be reconsidered in the absence of clear benefit. Further investigation is needed to optimize protocols for safety and efficacy. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Hematological Cancers Patients with Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Infection: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5870-5870
Author(s):  
Raseen Tariq ◽  
Fateeha Furqan ◽  
Saad Jamshed ◽  
Sahil Khanna
Keyword(s):  
Case Reports ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Fecal Microbiota ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Fecal Microbiota Transplant ◽  
Hematological Cancer ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Hematological Cancers ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

Introduction: Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Immunosuppression is one of the risk factors for CDI. However, most of the trials evaluating efficacy of FMT have excluded immunocompromised patients. Patients with hematological cancers represent a major class of immunocompromised patients. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of FMT in patients with hematological cancer for the treatment of recurrent CDI. Methods: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science was performed from January 2000 up to December 2018. Articles included for meta-analysis were case series and case reports that assessed efficacy of FMT in hematological cancer patients were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The main outcomes were pooled proportions of patients achieving cure after first FMT. The cure rate was defined as resolution of diarrhea without any recurrence. Results: 10 studies (5 case series and 5 case reports) were included in the analysis, making up 29 patients who underwent 38 total FMT procedures. The follow up period ranged from 1- 14 months. Of the included patients, 17 had leukemia, 10 had lymphoma and 2 patients had multiple myeloma and myelodysplastic syndrome each. 7 of these patients had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The pooled cure rate was 82% [confidence interval (CI) 67-94%] after 1 FMT with no heterogeneity (I2=0%). Minor publication bias was seen on visual inspection of funnel plot. FMT was generally well tolerated by these patients. No serious side effects were reported in any study. One of the studies reported death due to cardiac arrest 5 days after FMT which was thought to be unrelated to the procedure. Mild side effects including mild abdominal pain, transient diarrhea, fecal urgency, constipation and nausea were reported in 5 patients. Conclusion: Based on limited observational data, FMT seems to be an effective and safe modality for management of recurrent CDI in patients with hematological cancers. However, further prospective clinical trials are needed to establish its safety as a first line therapy for recurrent CDI in this population. Figure Disclosures Jamshed: Takeda Pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Khanna:Rebiotix, Inc: Research Funding; Probio Tech, LLC: Consultancy; Facile Therapeutics: Consultancy; Shire, Plc: Consultancy.

scholarly journals 1211. Response to Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) in Refractory Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) is Modest Compared to Recurrent CDI in Hospitalized Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S627-S627
Author(s):  
Jae Hyun Shin ◽  
R Ann Hays ◽  
Cirle Warren
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Complete Resolution ◽  
Fecal Microbiota ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
University Of Virginia ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Fecal Microbiota Transplant ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

Abstract Background There are limited options for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) refractory to conventional antibiotic therapy (metronidazole, vancomycin, or fidaxomicin). Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is considered a safe and effective treatment for recurrent CDI but has not been widely utilized for refractory CDI due to concerns about safety. Even when included in studies, refractory CDI has not been analyzed separately from recurrent CDI. We reviewed cases of FMT performed in the inpatient setting for CDI to evaluate its safety and efficacy for refractory CDI. Methods Patients who received FMT inpatient at University of Virginia Health System for recurrent or refractory CDI after Infectious Diseases and Gastroenterology consultation signed informed consent acknowledging that FMT was considered investigational use in CDI not responding to standard of care as per 2014 FDA guidance. Charts were reviewed as part of quality improvement efforts to evaluate safety and efficacy of FMT in inpatient setting. Results Starting in July 2014, 13 patients received FMT for CDI as inpatients. Six received FMT for recurrent CDI, with four having complete resolution, one had recurrent CDI, and one had persistent C. difficile-negative diarrhea, for cure rate of 83%, comparable to published studies. Seven patients received FMT for refractory CDI, with three resulting in complete resolution. One responded to FMT but refused further care, one died from multiorgan failure after initial response to FMT that was possibly related to CDI, strongyloides, and/or CMV. Two patients had ongoing diarrhea suggestive of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome, one was C. difficile-negative and one was not tested. The cure rate was 57%, lower than that of the recurrent CDI, but without any clear evidence of microbiologic failure. Outcome of patients undergoing FMT for CDI in the inpatient setting at University of Virginia Health System Conclusion Cure rate for FMT for refractory CDI was lower than recurrent CDI, but review of the cases of treatment failures did not reveal any microbiologic evidence of failure. FMT should be considered an alternative option when treating refractory CDI. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document