Tenofovir versus tenofovir plus entecavir for chronic hepatitis B with lamivudine resistance and entecavir resistance

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Lee ◽  
S. H. Ahn ◽  
K. S. Jung ◽  
D. Y. Kim ◽  
B. K. Kim ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Ning Song ◽  
Mei-Zhu Hong ◽  
Dan-Qing Luo ◽  
Wen-Qi Huang ◽  
Feng Min ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Lian Wang ◽  
Xi Lu ◽  
Xudong Yang ◽  
Nan Xu

The relative efficacy of different strategies for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with lamivudine resistance (LAM-R) has not yet been systematically studied. Clinical trials were searched in PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CNKI databases up to February 15, 2016. Nine trials including 764 patients met the entry criteria. In direct meta-analysis, TDF showed a stronger antiviral effect than any one of ETV, LAM/ADV, and ADV against LAM-R hepatitis B virus. LAM/ADV therapy was superior to ADV in suppressing viral replication. ETV achieved similar rate of HBV DNA undetectable compared to ADV or LAM/ADV. In network meta-analysis, TDF had higher rates of HBV DNA undetectable compared to ETV (OR, 24.69; 95% CrI: 5.36–113.66), ADV (OR, 37.28; 95% CrI: 9.73–142.92), or LAM/ADV (OR, 21.05; 95% CrI: 5.70–77.80). However, among ETV, ADV, and LAM/ADV, no drug was clearly superior to others in HBV DNA undetectable rate. Moreover, no significant difference in the rate of ALT normalization or HBeAg loss was observed compared the four rescue strategies with each other. TDF appears to be a more effective rescue therapy than LAM/ADV, ETV, or ADV. LAM plus ADV therapy was a better treatment option than ETV or ADV alone for patients with LAM-R.


2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 1730-1737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong-Hoon Lee ◽  
Yuri Cho ◽  
Dong Hyeon Lee ◽  
Minjong Lee ◽  
Jeong-ju Yoo ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe efficacy of entecavir (ETV) treatment in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who were exposed to lamivudine (LAM) but had no detectable LAM resistance (LAM-R) is not well evaluated. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether the probability of developing genotypic resistance to ETV in LAM-exposed patients with or without LAM-R is comparable to that in antiviral-naive patients. This retrospective cohort study included 500 consecutive patients with CHB who started ETV monotherapy at a single tertiary hospital in Korea. The patients were divided into three groups: nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naive patients (group 1,n= 142), patients who were previously exposed to LAM and had no currently or previously detected LAM-R (group 2,n= 233), and patients with LAM-R when starting ETV (group 3,n= 125). The overall median ETV treatment duration was 48.7 months. The probabilities of virologic breakthrough were significantly increased not only in group 3 (hazard ratio [HR] = 14.4,P< 0.001) but also in group 2 (HR = 5.0,P< 0.001) compared to group 1. Genotypic ETV resistance (ETV-R) developed more frequently in group 2 (HR = 13.0,P= 0.013) as well as group 3 (HR = 43.9,P< 0.001) than in group 1: the probabilities of developing ETV-R in groups 1, 2, and 3 were <1.0%, 8.0%, and 28.2%, respectively, at month 48. The results of this study indicate that ETV-R occurred more frequently in LAM-exposed patients, even though they had no detectable LAM-R, than in NA-naive patients. Therefore, LAM-exposed CHB patients, regardless of the presence or absence of LAM-R, should be monitored more cautiously for the development of ETV-R during ETV monotherapy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 810
Author(s):  
Kyung Ho Ha ◽  
Dong Wook Joo ◽  
Ji Suk Kim ◽  
Byung Seok Kim ◽  
Chang Hyeong Lee

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vahdat Poortahmasebi ◽  
Reza Malekzadeh ◽  
Ghodratollah Montazeri ◽  
Ehsan Fakhari ◽  
Mehdi Norouzi ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1078-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander J V Thompson ◽  
Anna Ayres ◽  
Lilly Yuen ◽  
Angeline Bartholomeusz ◽  
D Scott Bowden ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1393-1395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter Honkoop ◽  
Hubert G.M. Niesters ◽  
Robert A.M. de Man ◽  
Albert D.M.E. Osterhaus ◽  
Solko W. Schalm

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document