scholarly journals Human oral processing and texture profile analysis parameters: Bridging the gap between the sensory evaluation and the instrumental measurements

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 369-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuyoshi Nishinari ◽  
Yapeng Fang ◽  
Andrew Rosenthal
Keyword(s):  
Sensory Evaluation ◽  
Profile Analysis ◽  
Texture Profile Analysis ◽  
Texture Profile ◽  
Oral Processing

Development and quality assessment of chicken cutlets enrobed with bread crumbs vis-à-vis dried carrot pomace

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 700-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogesh Kumar ◽  
Vinay Kumar Tanwar ◽  
Anurag Pandey ◽  
Prateek Shukla ◽  
Vikas Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Sensory Evaluation ◽  
Profile Analysis ◽  
Meat Products ◽  
Chemical Properties ◽  
Sensory Attributes ◽  
Texture Profile Analysis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Texture Profile ◽  
Physico Chemical

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop chicken cutlets enrobed with bread crumbs vis-à-vis dried carrot pomace and to assess its effect on physico-chemical properties, sensory attributes and texture profile analysis. Design/methodology/approach Three experimental groups were made: control group chicken cutlets (C), chicken cutlets enrobed with bread crumbs group (Tb) and chicken cutlets enrobed with dried carrot pomace group (Tc). All the procedures used in the study for estimation of various physico-chemical properties, sensory evaluation and texture profile analysis were standard protocols. Findings There was a significant (p < 0.05) increase in water holding capacity, crude fibre content and ash content of enrobed chicken cutlets, whereas moisture, fat content and shrinkage of product were significantly (p < 0.05) decreased. The results for sensory evaluation and texture profile analysis of enrobed chicken cutlets were better than control group. Overall acceptability score of chicken cutlets enrobed with dried carrot pomace was revealed to be highest (7.5 ± 0.29) and that of control group was found to be lowest (6.4 ± 0.22). Hardness (N/cm2) value found for control group chicken cutlets, chicken cutlets enrobed with bread crumbs group and chicken cutlets enrobed with dried carrot pomace group were 2.2 ± 0.17, 3.1 ± 0.29 and 4.3 ± 0.27, respectively. Research limitations/implications Future research may benefit to assess the effect of enrobing with bread crumbs and dried carrot pomace on mineral and vitamin content and lipid profile of meat products. Originality/value Enrobing of chicken cutlets with bread crumbs and dried carrot pomace improved the sensory attributes along with texture profile analysis. Hence, enrobing with bread crumbs and dried carrot pomace could be used as processing technology to improve sensory appeal, especially crispiness of meat products.

scholarly journals The Sensory Evaluation and Mechanical Properties of Functional Gummy in the Malaysian Market

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohd Muzamir Mahat ◽  
Awis Sukarni Mohmad Sabere ◽  
Saiful 'Arifin Shafiee ◽  
Mohd Azizi Nawawi ◽  
Hairul Hisham Hamzah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Fourier Transform ◽  
Infrared Spectroscopy ◽  
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy ◽  
Sensory Evaluation ◽  
Functional Groups ◽  
Organic Material ◽  
Profile Analysis ◽  
Texture Profile Analysis ◽  
Texture Profile

The popularity of functional gummies has increased, which is evident from the growing line of functional gummies from almost every nutraceutical companies. Sensory evaluation serves the purpose of determining which brand of functional gummy would capture the largest market share. Texture profile analysis was used to determine the mechanical properties of functional gummies. The brands of functional gummies that came under the scope of this study were denoted as Brand A, B, C, D, E, F and G. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy was utilised to detect organic material and functional groups in the functional gummies. Texture profile analysis gave valuable insights into the gummies&rsquo; mechanical properties which are cohesiveness, springiness, hardness, gumminess, and chewiness. Amongst the gummies that were studied, Brand F gummy has the highest value of cohesiveness of 0.92. Brand A gummy has a high springiness value of 1.0. Brand B gummy possesses the highest value of hardness, gumminess and chewiness of 12 532.2 g, 7617.6 N, and 6256.8 J, respectively. Qualitative sensory evaluation reveals that Brand G gummy has the best aesthetic qualities in terms of colour and appearance. Brand B gummy tastes the best while brand A gummy claims the top spot for gumminess and chewiness. Overall, the respondents in this study preferred brand A gummy over other brands.

Measurement of Instrumental Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) of Foods

2021 ◽  
pp. 427-465
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shafiur Rahman ◽  
Zahir Humaid Al-Attabi ◽  
Nasser Al-Habsi ◽  
Mohammed Al-Khusaibi
Keyword(s):  
Profile Analysis ◽  
Texture Profile Analysis ◽  
Texture Profile ◽  
Instrumental Texture
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document