scholarly journals Ability of a single negative ultrasound to rule out deep vein thrombosis in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 373-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumait Al Lawati ◽  
Jafar Aljazeeri ◽  
Shannon M. Bates ◽  
Wee‐Shian Chan ◽  
Kerstin De Wit
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Rule Out

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of three ultrasonography strategies for deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. e0228788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noémie Kraaijpoel ◽  
Marc Carrier ◽  
Grégoire Le Gal ◽  
Matthew D. F. McInnes ◽  
Jean-Paul Salameh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

scholarly journals Prophylactic anticoagulant therapy decreases the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients with solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Yunjiao Zhou ◽  
Gong Yang ◽  
Chenglei Huang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
And Control ◽  
Deep Vein

It is not well understood the efficacy and safety of primary deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis of anticoagulants in patients with solid tumors. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) determines the relative ratio of primary DVT, survival rate and bleeding events among patients with solid tumors treated with anticoagulants or placebo. Comprehensive literature searches were conducted through the Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases published from January 1st, 1993 to December 31st, 2015. Statistical analysis was performed by RevMan 5.0 software. For DVT events, therisk ratio in 16 trials between the prophylactic and control patients was statistically significant at 0.45 [0.36-0.58]; for major bleeding events, the risk ratio in 18 trials between the prophylactic and control patients was not statistically significant at 1.33 [0.99-1.79], while that in 15 trials with clinically relevant non-major bleeding was statistically significant at 1.83 [1.46-2.30]; the risk ratio for the mortality rate of patients with solid tumors in 16 trials was not statistically significant at 0.97 [0.93-1.02]. Inconclusion, the risk ratio in this meta-analysis showed a significantly reduced incidence of DVT with anticoagulant use. Treatment to patients who had solid tumors with prophylactic anticoagulants enhanced the incidence rate of non-major bleeding but has no significant impact on the incidence rate of major bleeding. No significant differences were found in the mortality outcomes between anticoagulant and non-anticoagulant groups.

The accuracy of MRI in diagnosis of suspected deep vein thrombosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona C. Sampson ◽  
Steve W. Goodacre ◽  
Steven M. Thomas ◽  
Edwin J. R. van Beek
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document