Root surface modifiers and subepithelial connective tissue graft for treatment of gingival recessions: a systematic review

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. B. H. Karam ◽  
A. C. P. Sant'Ana ◽  
M. L. R. de Rezende ◽  
S. L. A. Greghi ◽  
C. A. Damante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Root Surface ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Surface Modifiers ◽  
Tissue Graft ◽  
Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft

scholarly journals How Thick Is the Oral Mucosa around Implants after Augmentation with Different Materials: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Substitute Matrices in Comparison to Connective Tissue Grafts

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (14) ◽  
pp. 5043
Author(s):  
Martin Lissek ◽  
Martin Boeker ◽  
Arndt Happe
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Oral Mucosa ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Grafts ◽  
Substitute Materials

This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of xenogeneic collagen matrices (XCMs) and acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) in comparison to connective tissue grafts (CTGs) for the augmentation of oral mucosa around dental implants. MEDLINE and the Web of Science were searched for clinical studies that compared substitute materials for the augmentation of oral mucosa to the subepithelial connective tissue graft around dental implants during or after implantation. The review was conducted according to the recommendations of the PRISMA statement. From an initial search result set of 1050 references, seven articles were included in the review. The study designs were heterogeneous, so no meta-analysis could be performed. Both the CTG and either type of substitute material resulted in increased mucosal thickness. Four studies showed no significant difference, while three demonstrated a significant difference, favoring the CTGs over alternative materials. Soft tissue augmentation around dental implants is a safe procedure and leads to thicker mucosal tissue. The subepithelial connective tissue graft can still be regarded as the gold standard, but substitute materials may be an acceptable alternative in some situations, such as for pain-sensitive patients, among inexperienced surgeons, and for sites with an already thick biotype.

scholarly journals Effect of Root Surface Biomodification on Multiple Recession Coverage with Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft: A Retrospective Analysis

Gels ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Bartłomiej Górski ◽  
Marcin Szerszeń
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Root Surface ◽  
Enamel Matrix Derivative ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Clinical Attachment Level ◽  
Gingival Thickness ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft ◽  
Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Attachment Level

To improve treatment efficacy of gingival recessions (GR), chemical preparation of the exposed root surface was advocated. The aim of this study was to compare the additional influence of root biomodifications with 24% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) alone or with enamel matrix derivative (EMD) on the 12 month outcomes of modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) with subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple GR. Average root coverage (ARC), complete root coverage (CRC), reduction in GR, reduction in recession width (RW), gain in clinical attachment level (CAL), increase in gingival thickness (GT), increase in keratinized tissue width (KTW) and changes in root coverage esthetic score (RES) were evaluated. A total of 60 patients with 215 GR were enrolled. In 70, GR root surfaces were treated with EDTA + EMD, in other 72, with EDTA, while in the remaining 73 saline solution was applied. ARC was 94%, 89%, and 91% in the EDTA + EMD, the EDTA and the saline groups, respectively (p = 0.8871). Gains in clinical attachment level (CAL; 2.1 ± 1.1 mm) and RES values (9.6 ± 0.9) were significantly higher in the EDTA + EMD group, when compared with two other groups. The differences between other preoperative and postoperative parameters showed statistical significance only within but not between groups. MCAT outcomes may benefit from adjunctive use of EDTA + EMD regarding 12 month CAL gain and professionally assessed esthetics using RES following treatment of GR.

scholarly journals Treatment of Gingival Recessions Associated to Cervical Abrasion Lesions with Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft: A Case Report

2009 ◽  
Vol 03 (04) ◽  
pp. 318-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana M. Deliberador ◽  
Alvaro F. Bosco ◽  
Thiago M. Martins ◽  
Maria J. H. Nagata
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Root Surface ◽  
Gingival Tissue ◽  
Periodontal Health ◽  
Coronally Advanced Flap ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft ◽  
Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Clinical Conditions

ABSTRACTExtensive gingival recessions associated with cervical abrasions are common among the population. Several different surgical and/or restorative therapies have been proposed to correct these lesions. This manuscript reports the treatment of multiple gingival recessions associatedto cervical abrasions. The procedure involved the utilization of subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) combined with coronally advanced flap onto a previously restored root surface. At the postoperative follow-up visits, the success of the restorative/surgical approach was confirmed by the absence of bleeding to probing and periodontal pockets as well as presence of gingival tissue with normal color, texture and contouring. After 18 months of follow-up, the clinical conditions are stable with satisfactory root coverage and periodontal health. An excellent esthetical outcome was achieved and the patient is satisfied with case resolution. (Eur J Dent 2009;3:318-323)

scholarly journals Er-Yag Laser Root Preparation During Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Procedures.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
José Ricardo Kina ◽  
Eunice Fumico Umeda Kina ◽  
Juliana Kina ◽  
Mônica Kina
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Root Surface ◽  
Periodontal Therapy ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Yag Laser ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft ◽  
Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft

Areas of gingival recession cause either an esthetic problem and or root sensitivity. Obtaining predictable root coverage has become an important part of periodontal therapy. A deep, long – standing recession promoted by ANUG was treated using subepithelial connective tissue graft technique combined with decontamination of root surface by using Er:YAG laser. Our clinical findigs suggest that this technique is a predictable procedure to treat gingival recession and promote root decontamination.

Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for Gingival Recession Coverage: A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Mehta
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Tooth Brushing ◽  
Vulnerable Area ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft ◽  
Keratinized Tissue ◽  
Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Dentinal Hypersensitivity

The Gingival recession is considered a multi-factorial. The etiology may be an anatomically vulnerable area, faulty tooth brushing, high frenum attachment. In cases where there is progressive recession, aesthetics concern or increasing dentinal hypersensitivity, we can do recession coverage. Depending upon the presence or absence of adequate keratinized tissue we can choose the technique. In case of adequate width of keratinized tissue, usually we can do displaced flap and in case where there is inadequate width, we can do gingival grafting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document