scholarly journals Validity and Reliability of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms‐Japanese Version

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo Horita ◽  
Akihiro Nishio ◽  
Aki Kawamoto ◽  
Tadahiro Sado ◽  
Benjamin D. Locke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
Counseling Center ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Validity And Reliability

scholarly journals Development of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms‐Japanese version: Pilot study

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-105
Author(s):  
Ryo Horita ◽  
Aki Kawamoto ◽  
Akihiro Nishio ◽  
Tadahiro Sado ◽  
Benjamin D. Locke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
Counseling Center ◽  
Japanese Version

Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms--Japanese Version

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo Horita ◽  
Aki Kawamoto ◽  
Akihiro Nishio ◽  
Tadahiro Sado ◽  
Benjamin D. Locke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
Counseling Center ◽  
Japanese Version

The Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS): Merging clinical practice, training, and research.

Psychotherapy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 432-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo Jeong Youn ◽  
Louis G. Castonguay ◽  
Henry Xiao ◽  
Rebecca Janis ◽  
Andrew A. McAleavey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
Counseling Center ◽  
Training And Research

Military Background and Gender Identity in Psychological Assessment Among College Students: Factorial Invariance of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms–62 (CCAPS-62)

Assessment ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 107319112199876
Author(s):  
Arpita Ghosh ◽  
Christopher R. Niileksela ◽  
Rebecca Janis
Keyword(s):  
Gender Identity ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
College Counseling ◽  
Counseling Center ◽  
Factorial Invariance ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Military Background ◽  
And Gender

The purpose of this study was to examine the factorial invariance of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms–62 (CCAPS-62) across military background and gender identity. A sample of 2,208 military students and 2,208 nonmilitary students were chosen from a large database of university and college counseling centers. Using exploratory structural equation modeling, findings suggested the CCAPS-62 is mostly invariant across military background and gender identity. Only three item thresholds appeared to be noninvariant across groups. These results suggest comparisons of scores across military background and gender can be made. Latent mean differences across groups were also examined. After controlling for several background variables, there were some differences between males and females on subscales measuring depression, eating concerns, and generalized anxiety, but no differences between military and nonmilitary students. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

Clinical validity of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms-62 (CCAPS-62): Further evaluation and clinical applications.

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 575-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew A. McAleavey ◽  
Samuel S. Nordberg ◽  
Jeffrey A. Hayes ◽  
Louis G. Castonguay ◽  
Benjamin D. Locke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
Counseling Center ◽  
Clinical Applications ◽  
Clinical Validity

A Systems Study on Interprofessional Collaboration in Healthcare

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-108
Author(s):  
Hironobu Matsushita ◽  
Carole Orchard ◽  
Katsumi Fujitani ◽  
Kaori Ichikawa
Keyword(s):  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Alpha Coefficient ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Team Collaboration ◽  
Interprofessional Team ◽  
Excellent Internal Consistency ◽  
Acute Healthcare

This study aims to translate and adapt the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (AITCS-II) cross-culturally for effective and systemic use in Japan, to describe floor and ceiling values, and to examine in terms of such criteria as reliability and face and content validity. The AITCS-II was translated from English into Japanese to develop the Japanese version of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (hereinafter referred to AITCS-II-J). Then, cross-sectional and cross-professional data analyses were carried out to seek evidence of construct validity. Analysis demonstrated good content and face validity. With a Cronbach's alpha coefficient greater than 0.9 (r varied from 0.912 to 0.940), the AITCS-II-J exhibited excellent internal consistency. The AITCS-II-J showed evidence of acceptable validity and reliability; therefore, this measurement system will be useful for informing the enhancement of interprofessional team collaboration within the Japanese acute healthcare context.

scholarly journals The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiko Kanehara ◽  
Risa Kotake ◽  
Yuki Miyamoto ◽  
Yousuke Kumakura ◽  
Kentaro Morita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Validity And Reliability

Abstract Background Personal recovery is increasingly recognised as an important outcome measure in mental health services. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-J) and test its validity and reliability. Methods The study comprised two stages that employed the cross-sectional and prospective cohort designs, respectively. We translated the questionnaire using a standard translation/back-translation method. Convergent validity was examined by calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficients with scores on the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) and the Short-Form-8 Health Survey (SF-8). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to examine factorial validity. We used intraclass correlation and Cronbach’s alpha to examine the test-retest and internal consistency reliability of the QPR-J’s 22-item full scale, 17-item intrapersonal and 5-item interpersonal subscales. We conducted an EFA along with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results Data were obtained from 197 users of mental health services (mean age: 42.0 years; 61.9% female; 49.2% diagnosed with schizophrenia). The QPR-J showed adequate convergent validity, exhibiting significant, positive correlations with the RAS and SF-8 scores. The QPR-J’s full version, subscales, showed excellent test-retest and internal consistency reliability, with the exception of acceptable but relatively low internal consistency reliability for the interpersonal subscale. Based on the results of the CFA and EFA, we adopted the factor structure extracted from the original 2-factor model based on the present CFA. Conclusion The QPR-J is an adequately valid and reliable measure of the process of recovery among Japanese users with mental health services.

scholarly journals Preliminary examination of reliability and validity of the Japanese child anxiety impact scale-parent version in Japanese community sample

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sho Okawa ◽  
Honami Arai ◽  
Hideki Nakamura ◽  
Yuko Urao ◽  
Tessa Reardon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Community Sample ◽  
Child Anxiety ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Theory Model ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Parent Version

AbstractThe child anxiety impact scale-parent version (CAIS-P) is a useful measure to assess the impact of anxiety on a child’s daily life; however, a Japanese version of the CAIS-P has not been developed, and whether the CAIS-P can be utilized in Eastern countries remains unascertained. The purpose of this study was to develop a Japanese version of the CAIS-P and examine its reliability and validity. Parents of 400 children (aged 7 to 15 years) from the Japanese community completed the CAIS-P. A confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the factor structure of the original CAIS-P, consisting of school activity, social activity, and home/family activity factors, provided a good fit for the Japanese version of the CAIS-P. Estimated Spearman’s correlation coefficients showed moderate correlations between the total and factor scores of the CAIS-P, anxiety symptoms (Spence Child Anxiety Scale-parent version), and depressive symptoms (Child Depression Inventory). Furthermore, the item response theory model revealed that each factor of the CAIS-P is a high information reliable measure for children with high trait anxiety. These results provide support for the Japanese version of the CAIS-P’s factorial validity, convergent validity, and reliability and its potential for application in child anxiety research in Japan.

The Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. e267-e273
Author(s):  
Haruhiko Hoshino ◽  
Yujiro Matsuishi ◽  
Yuki Enomoto ◽  
Nobutake Shimojo ◽  
Takahiro Kido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Japanese Version ◽  
Validity And Reliability
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document