Effect of Splinting of Tilted External Hexagon Implants on 3‐Unit Implant‐Supported Prostheses in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3D Finite Element Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Faria Almeida ◽  
Fellippo R. Verri ◽  
Cleidiel A. A. Lemos ◽  
Victor E. Souza Batista ◽  
Joel. F. Santiago Júnior ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
3D Finite Element ◽  
3D Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Posterior Maxilla

scholarly journals Retention System and Splinting on Morse Taper Implants in the Posterior Maxilla by 3D Finite Element Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos ◽  
Fellippo Ramos Verri ◽  
Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior ◽  
Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida ◽  
Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Distribution ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Stress Distributions ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
3D Finite Element ◽  
3D Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Oblique Loading

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate different retention systems (cement- or screw-retained) and crown designs (non-splinted or splinted) of fixed implant-supported restorations, in terms of stress distributions in implants/components and bone tissue, by 3-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. Four 3D models were simulated with the InVesalius, Rhinoceros 3D, and SolidWorks programs. Models were made of type III bone from the posterior maxillary area. Models included three 4.0-mm-diameter Morse taper (MT) implants with different lengths, which supported metal-ceramic crowns. Models were processed by the Femap and NeiNastran programs, using an axial force of 400 N and oblique force of 200 N. Results were visualized as the von Mises stress and maximum principal stress (σmax). Under axial loading, there was no difference in the distribution of stress in implants/components between retention systems and splinted crowns; however, in oblique loading, cemented prostheses showed better stress distribution than screwed prostheses, whereas splinted crowns tended to reduce stress in the implant of the first molar. In the bone tissue cemented prostheses showed better stress distribution in bone tissue than screwed prostheses under axial and oblique loading. The splinted design only had an effect in the screwed prosthesis, with no influence in the cemented prosthesis. Cemented prostheses on MT implants showed more favorable stress distributions in implants/components and bone tissue. Splinting was favorable for stress distribution only for screwed prostheses under oblique loading.

scholarly journals Effect of the acrylic occlusal device on the stress distribution in the external hexagon implant in situations of dental tightening. A 3D finite element analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e33610615601
Author(s):  
Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista ◽  
Lorena Scaioni Silva ◽  
Anderson Catelan ◽  
Carolina Santinoni dos Santos ◽  
Aljomar José Vechiato-Filho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
3D Models ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
3D Finite Element ◽  
3D Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Von Mises ◽  
Reducing Stress

The aim in the present study was to analyze the stress in the external hexagon implant (EH) in a situation of parafunction on three-unit implant-supported prostheses with and without the use of the acrylic occlusal device (AOD) using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA). Eight 3D models referring to the posterior maxilla with three EH supporting single and or splinted screwed metal-ceramic restoration and use of the AOD. AOD was modeled with a thickness of 2 mm. EHs were analyzed using von Mises criteria in the ANSYS 19.2 program. AOD showed to be effective in reducing stress in the EH. However, the use of the AOD was not effective enough to suggest the non-splinting of EH dental implant. The association of splinting and the use of an AOD in the posterior region of the maxilla may be an effective way to decrease the stress in the EH implant in a situation of parafunction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document