Endocrowns Clinical Performance and Patient Satisfaction: A Randomised Clinical Trial of Three Monolithic Ceramic Restorations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad El‐Ma'aita ◽  
Mohammad A. Al‐Rabab'ah ◽  
Motasum Abu‐Awwad ◽  
Susan Hattar ◽  
Hugh Devlin
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Ceramic Restorations

Patient satisfaction with occlusal scheme of conventional complete dentures: A randomised clinical trial (Part II)

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 702-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Moradpoor ◽  
F. Salari ◽  
B. Ebadian ◽  
S. Raissi ◽  
M. Shirani
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Complete Dentures

scholarly journals Three-year randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance, quantitative and qualitative wear patterns of hybrid composite restorations

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Senthamaraiselvi Palaniappan ◽  
Liesbeth Elsen ◽  
Inge Lijnen ◽  
Marleen Peumans ◽  
Bart Van Meerbeek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Hybrid Composite ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Composite Restorations

Randomised clinical trial of patient satisfaction with traditional and simplified complete dentures

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 386-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lira-Oetiker ◽  
F. Seguel-Galdames ◽  
I. Quero-Vallejos ◽  
S. E. Uribe
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Complete Dentures

scholarly journals 30-Month randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a nanofill and a nanohybrid composite

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Karina Maciel de Andrade ◽  
Rosângela Marques Duarte ◽  
Fábia Danielle Sales Cunha Medeiros e Silva ◽  
André Ulisses Dantas Batista ◽  
Kenio Costa Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial on the Survival of Lithium Disilicate Posterior Partial Crowns Bonded Using Immediate or Delayed Dentin Sealing: Short-term Results on Tooth Sensitivity and Patient Satisfaction

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. E212-E222 ◽  
Author(s):  
C van den Breemer ◽  
MMM Gresnigt ◽  
M Özcan ◽  
W Kerdijk ◽  
MS Cune
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Tooth Sensitivity ◽  
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Molar Teeth ◽  
Ceramic Restorations

SUMMARY This prospective randomized clinical trial evaluated tooth sensitivity and patient satisfaction after the provision of partial ceramic restorations bonded using immediate (IDS) or delayed dentin sealing (DDS) on vital molar teeth through a within-subject comparison study. Between December 2013 and May 2016, a total of 30 patients (13 women, 17 men; mean age, 54 years old) received two lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS-e.max press, Ivoclar Vivadent) partial restorations on vital first or second molar teeth (N=60). The two teeth randomly received either IDS (test group, n=30) or DDS (control group, n=30). Partial preparations were performed on all teeth and directly after tooth preparation. IDS was achieved using self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Primer and Adhesive, Kuraray) followed by the application of flowable resin (Clearfil Majesty Flow, Kuraray). Partial ceramic restorations were bonded (Variolink Ultra, Ivoclar Vivadent) two weeks after preparation. The teeth were evaluated preoperatively and at one week, three months, and 12 months postoperatively using a cold test and a questionnaire for perceived tooth sensitivity. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Data were analyzed using McNemar, chi-squared, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests (α=0.01). There was no significant difference in patient-reported tooth sensitivity between the preoperative phase and all other time points (p>0.01). There was also no significant difference between IDS and DDS (p>0.01) for all items on the questionnaire. VAS scores did not differ significantly between the IDS and DDS groups for all items in the questionnaire at all time points (p>0.01). No tooth sensitivity change was noticed with the application of partial ceramic indirect restorations. This clinical study could not confirm that IDS is more advantageous than DDS in terms of tooth sensitivity and patient satisfaction at 1 year of clinical service of partial ceramic restorations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document