Failure Risk of Short Dental Implants Under Immediate Loading: A Meta‐Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wu Hao ◽  
Shi Quan ◽  
Huang Yang ◽  
Chang Ping ◽  
Huo Na ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Immediate Loading ◽  
Failure Risk

scholarly journals Immediate loading of short implants: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-21
Author(s):  
Mahdi Hadilou ◽  
Pooya Ebrahimi ◽  
Behnaz Karimzadeh ◽  
Ashkan Ghaffary ◽  
Leila Gholami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Immediate Loading ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Manual Search ◽  
Short Implants ◽  
Loading Methods

Background. This systematic review aimed to determine the effectiveness and outcomes of immediate loading methods for short dental implants. Methods. The authors independently conducted an electronic search in the PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, ProQuest, and Cochrane databases for relevant articles published until November 15, 2020. The references of the included studies were assessed, and a manual search was conducted in Google Scholar and PubMed to find additional relevant studies. Results. Finally, three studies were selected and included in this systematic review. Significant heterogeneity existed in the design of the included studies, and due to the low number of the included studies, the authors could not perform a meta-analysis. The studies showed that the survival rate of immediate-loaded short implants is comparable to conventional loading methods. However, more marginal bone loss is expected. Overall, the immediate loading of short dental implants might be clinically successful. Conclusion. Based on the results, immediate loading protocols might be safely used for short implants. However, caution should be exercised in interpreting these results. Future welldesigned randomized clinical trials with more participants and study power are necessary to support the findings of this systematic review.

scholarly journals Comparing success of immediate versus delay loading of implants in fresh sockets: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Eyni ◽  
Hojatollah Yousefimanesh ◽  
Alireza Hashemi Ashtiani ◽  
Amal Saki-Malehi ◽  
Amin Olapour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Immediate Loading ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background and aims: The replacement of teeth with osseointegrated implants is one of the significant advances in the field of restorative dentistry. The time interval between tooth extraction and the implant can be very short or long. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to collect and evaluate articles related to determining the effect of immediate loading of dental implants are placed in the fresh socket initial stability on the clinical success of the implant compared to delay loading procedure. Materials and Methods: In this study, all the available articles indexed in leading databases, including PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, PROSPERO, and Scopus were searched. The full text of the articles meeting the primary criteria to be included in this research was obtained and appraised. Data of studies were extracted if they were scored as a high or moderate level of evidence. Results: A total of 2,258 published articles were found through electronic database searching. After screening the titles and abstracts, and full-text of articles 16 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The results of this study revealed that regarding the success rate, although there was no significant difference between immediate and delay loading of dental implants, immediate procedure showed a lower incidence of bone loss in single implants. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, immediate loading of dental implant, under certain conditions, is a successful treatment process and is effective in reducing treatment time. Thus, immediate loading represents a valid alternative to the traditional delayed loading rehabilitation.

A pilot study for the analysis of some biomechanical risk factors regarding the immediate loading of dental implants

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 1495-1500
Author(s):  
DRAGOS EPISTATU ◽  
ELENA STRATAN ◽  
CEZAR TRASCU ◽  
FLORIAN C DOGIOIU ◽  
IOANA SUCIU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Immediate Loading

scholarly journals Peri-Implant bone response around porous-surface dental implants: A preclinical meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abeer Ahmed ◽  
Abdulaziz Al-Rasheed ◽  
Mohammed Badwelan ◽  
Hamdan S Alghamdi
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Porous Surface ◽  
Bone Response

Clinical evidence on titanium–zirconium dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 842-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Altuna ◽  
E. Lucas-Taulé ◽  
J. Gargallo-Albiol ◽  
O. Figueras-Álvarez ◽  
F. Hernández-Alfaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Clinical Evidence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Titanium Zirconium

scholarly journals The osseointegration and stability of dental implants with different surface treatments in animal models: a network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Ping Hao ◽  
Nan-Jue Cao ◽  
Yu-He Zhu ◽  
Wei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Missing Teeth ◽  
Treatment Technology ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Early Healing

AbstractDental implants are commonly used to repair missing teeth. The implant surface plays a critical role in promoting osseointegration and implant success. However, little information is available about which implant surface treatment technology best promotes osseointegration and implant stability. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to evaluate the osseointegration and stability of four commonly used dental implants (SLA, SLActive, TiUnite, and Osseotite). The protocol of the current meta-analysis is registered in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) under the code CRD42020190907 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk). We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA and Cochrane Recommendations. Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Embase, and the Web of Science databases were searched. Only randomized controlled trials were considered. Twelve studies were included in the current network meta-analysis, eleven studies were included concerning the osseointegration effect and five studies were included for stability analysis (four studies were used to assess both stability and osseointegration). Rank possibility shows that the SLActive surface best promoted bone formation at an early healing stage and TiUnite seemed to be the best surface for overall osseointegration. For stability, TiUnite seemed to be the best surface. The present network meta-analysis showed that the SLActive surface has the potential to promote osseointegration at an early stage. The TiUnite surface had the best effect on osseointegration regarding the overall healing period. The TiUnite surface also had the best effect in stability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document