Comparative effectiveness of low‐level laser therapy with different wavelengths and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation in the treatment of pain caused by temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Ren ◽  
Jingying Liu ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Caiyun Yu ◽  
Guangjie Bao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Electric Nerve Stimulation

Comparative effectiveness of low-level laser therapy and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation in the treatment of pain caused by temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Ren ◽  
Jingying Liu ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Caiyun Yu ◽  
Guangjie Bao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Temporomandibular Joint ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pain Reduction ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Electric Nerve Stimulation

Abstract Background: The comparative effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) in the treatment of pain caused by temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) has not been evaluated.Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched from their inception until 27 October 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of LLLT or TENS or placebo group for TMD patients’ pain reduction were included. The reviewers assessed the risk of bias of individual studies with the Cochrane risk of bias tool, excluding RCTs with a high risk of bias in any domain. Then the reviewers did network meta-analysis and assessed the quality of evidence contributing to network estimate using the GRADE framework.Results: 20 RCTs with 758 patients with TMD were included. In the pair-wise meta-analysis, LLLT and TENs showed a significant pain reduction in the visual analogue scale (VAS) compared with placebo immediately after treatment [mean difference (MD)=1.99, 95% confidence interval (CI):(1.07,2.92); MD=2.16, 95%CI:(0.27,4.04), respectively]. As for pain reduction one month after treatment, LLLT performed better and there was no statistically significant difference for TENS as compared with placebo. Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis showed the short-term efficacy of LLLT is more positive than TENS in the treatment of pain caused by temporomandibular joint disorders.

scholarly journals Low-level laser therapy for temporomandibular disorders (tmd) treatment: a systematic review of randomized trials

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 376
Author(s):  
Priscila Leite ◽  
Nicole Melo ◽  
Pâmela Silva ◽  
Robinsom Montenegro ◽  
Paulo Bonan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Temporomandibular Joint ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Significant Difference

AIM: Conducting a systematic review of randomized clinical trials focusing on the efficacy of LLLT on pain control in patients with TMD, diagnosed by the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Search was performed at PubMed/MEDLINE database with the terms: (1) “Laser AND temporomandibular disorders”; (2) “Laser AND temporomandibular disorders AND RDC/TMD”; (3) “Low-level laser therapy AND temporomandibular disorders”; (4) “Low-level laser therapy AND temporomandibular disorders AND RDC/TMD”; (5) “Low-level laser therapy AND temporomandibular joint dysfuntion syndrome”; (6) “Low-level laser therapy AND temporomandibular joint dysfuntion syndrome AND RDC/TMD”; (7) “Laser AND temporomandibular joint dysfuntion syndrome” (8) “Laser AND RDC/TMD”; (9) “Low-level laser therapy AND RDC/TMD”. Inclusion criteria: articles need to be randomized clinical trial performed in humans; evaluate the effect of LLLT in the treatment of TMD diagnosed by the use of RDC/TMD; published in English or Portuguese in the last 10 years. Protocol studies and pilot studies were excluded. RESULTS: Ten studies were included. The type of laser used was Gallium Aluminum Arsenide (GaAlAs) diode, with exception of 1 paper, which used super pulsed Gallium Arsenide laser. Eight studies reported decreased in pain levels, in two articles there was no statistically significant difference between test and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: In most studies, LLLT was effective in pain remission, but there is no standardization in parameters like wavelength, output power and frequency. Studies with more complex experimental designs, standardized diagnostic criteria for TMD and defined protocols for the use of LLLT are needed to determine its efficacy in the treatment of TMD.

Effect of low-level laser therapy on pain and disability in patients with plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 102478
Author(s):  
Janice S. Guimarães ◽  
Fabio L. Arcanjo ◽  
Gustavo Leporace ◽  
Leonardo F. Metsavaht ◽  
Cristiano Sena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document