A systematic review and meta-analysis of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses: Are the results of 2 abutment implants comparable to the results of 2 abutment teeth?

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. W. P. Pol ◽  
G. M. Raghoebar ◽  
W. Kerdijk ◽  
G. C. Boven ◽  
M. S. Cune ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Abutment Teeth ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses

scholarly journals Reliability of Metal 3D Printing with Respect to the Marginal Fit of Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 4781
Author(s):  
Soohyun Bae ◽  
Min-Ho Hong ◽  
Hyunwoo Lee ◽  
Cheong-Hee Lee ◽  
Mihee Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
3D Printing ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cobalt Chromium ◽  
Marginal Fit ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Standard Mean Difference ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Metal 3D Printing

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies have been widely used to manufacture crowns and frameworks for fixed dental prostheses. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the reliability of the marginal fit of 3D-printed cobalt-chromium-based fixed dental prostheses in comparison to conventional casting methods. Articles published until 25 June 2020, reporting the marginal fit of fixed prostheses fabricated with metal 3D printing, were searched using electronic literature databases. After the screening and quality assessment, 21 eligible peer-reviewed articles were selected. Meta-analysis revealed that the marginal gap of the prostheses manufactured using 3D printing was significantly smaller compared to that manufactured using casting methods (standard mean difference (95% CI): −0.92 (−1.45, −0.38); Z = −3.37; p = 0.0008). The estimated difference between the single and multi-unit types did not differ significantly (p = 0.3573). In the subgroup analysis for the measurement methods, the tendency of marginal discrepancy between the 3D printing and casting groups was significantly different between articles that used direct observation and those that used the silicone replica technique (p < 0.001). Metal 3D printing technologies appear reliable as an alternative to casting methods in terms of the fit of the fixed dental prostheses. In order to analyze the factors influencing manufacturing and confirm the results of this review, further controlled laboratory and clinical studies are required.

scholarly journals Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM All-Ceramic Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 2672
Author(s):  
Babak Saravi ◽  
Andreas Vollmer ◽  
Maja Hartmann ◽  
Gernot Lang ◽  
Ralf-Joachim Kohal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses

Although CAD/CAM ceramics present a promising alternative to metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses, little is known about their mid- and long-term clinical performance. This systematic review aims to estimate the survival and success rates and describes the underlying complication characteristics for CAD/CAM tooth-supported zirconia- and lithium disilicate-based fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). We systematically searched MEDLINE and Web of Science to find relevant prospective studies with a follow-up of at least one year. We estimated pooled 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival and success rates by combining the collected data in a Poisson regression model. Descriptive statistics were conducted to evaluate the distribution of failures and complications in the included studies. Risk of bias for the included studies was assessed with an adapted checklist for single-arm trials. Pooled estimated 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates ranged from 93.80% to 94.66%, 89.67% to 91.1%, and 79.33% to 82.20%, respectively. The corresponding success rates excluding failures, but including any other types of intervention were 94.53% to 96.77%, 90.89% to 94.62%, and 81.78% to 89.25%. Secondary caries was the most frequent cause of failure, followed by chipping of the veneering. The most common cause of complication excluding failures but requiring intervention was chipping of the veneering. Risk of bias was generally acceptable for the included studies, with seven studies associated with low risk of bias, eight studies with a moderate risk of bias, and three studies with serious risk of bias. The current meta-analysis on CAD/CAM-supported FDPs revealed satisfying survival and success rates for up to 10 years of exposure. More prospective studies focusing on long-term performance are needed to strengthen the evidence currently available in the literature.

scholarly journals Biological and technical complications of tilted implants in comparison with straight implants supporting fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 295-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman ◽  
David Soto-Peñaloza ◽  
Yasushi Nakajima ◽  
Spyridon N. Papageorgiou ◽  
Daniele Botticelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Technical Complications ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses

Survival rates and complication behaviour of tooth implant–supported, fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 103167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manja von Stein-Lausnitz ◽  
Hans-Joachim Nickenig ◽  
Stefan Wolfart ◽  
Konrad Neumann ◽  
Axel von Stein-Lausnitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses

scholarly journals Biological and mechanical complications of angulated abutments connected to fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review with meta‐analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Omori ◽  
Niklaus P. Lang ◽  
Daniele Botticelli ◽  
Spyridon N. Papageorgiou ◽  
Shunsuke Baba
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mechanical Complications ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document