What can we do about occupational violence in emergency departments? A survey of emergency staff

Author(s):  
C.J. Cabilan ◽  
Rob Eley ◽  
Centaine L. Snoswell ◽  
Amy N.B. Johnston
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Alameddine ◽  
Nasser Yassin

Healthcare settings are notorious for exposing their employees to high levels of verbal and physical violence. A recent study on occupational violence at Lebanese Emergency Departments (EDs) revealed that 70% of surveyed ED workers were exposed to at least one incidence of violence over the last twelve months. Acting on the findings of this study a multi-stakeholder policy forum was held with key ED stakeholders to discuss possible policy and practice changes to reduce health workers’ exposure to occupational violence. Stakeholder deliberations revealed that the root causes of violence in EDs could be classified under three main categories relating to the administration of EDs including the presence of antiviolence policies, the management of human resources, and balancing patient expectations. Stakeholders built a consensus on a number of remedial actions at the societal, health care facility and policy levels. Engaging with various stakeholders in an open forum was a unique initiative that contributed to building a consensus among key stakeholders on a road map to help protect health workers in EDs and beyond.


2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 455-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Alameddine ◽  
Amin Kazzi ◽  
Fadi El‐Jardali ◽  
Hani Dimassi ◽  
Salwa Maalouf

Crisis ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Luke Larkin ◽  
Annette L. Beautrais

Crisis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 318-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Stanley ◽  
Glenn W. Currier ◽  
Megan Chesin ◽  
Sadia Chaudhury ◽  
Shari Jager-Hyman ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: External causes of injury codes (E-codes) are used in administrative and claims databases for billing and often employed to estimate the number of self-injury visits to emergency departments (EDs). Aims: This study assessed the accuracy of E-codes using standardized, independently administered research assessments at the time of ED visits. Method: We recruited 254 patients at three psychiatric emergency departments in the United States between 2007 and 2011, who completed research assessments after presenting for suicide-related concerns and were classified as suicide attempters (50.4%, n = 128), nonsuicidal self-injurers (11.8%, n = 30), psychiatric controls (29.9%, n = 76), or interrupted suicide attempters (7.8%, n = 20). These classifications were compared with their E-code classifications. Results: Of the participants, 21.7% (55/254) received an E-code. In all, 36.7% of research-classified suicide attempters and 26.7% of research-classified nonsuicidal self-injurers received self-inflicted injury E-codes. Those who did not receive an E-code but should have based on the research assessments had more severe psychopathology, more Axis I diagnoses, more suicide attempts, and greater suicidal ideation. Limitations: The sample came from three large academic medical centers and these findings may not be generalizable to all EDs. Conclusion: The frequency of ED visits for self-inflicted injury is much greater than current figures indicate and should be increased threefold.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document