scholarly journals Benefits and Disadvantages of Individuals’ Multiple Team Membership: The Moderating Role of Organizational Tenure

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 1502-1530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik J. Brake ◽  
Frank Walter ◽  
Floor A. Rink ◽  
Peter J. M. D. Essens ◽  
Gerben S. Vegt
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Tenure ◽  
Multiple Team Membership ◽  
Moderating Role

Team Knowledge Diversity and Team Creativity: The Moderating Role of Status Inequality

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 1611-1622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won-Woo Park ◽  
Joon Yeol Lew ◽  
Eun Kyung Lee
Keyword(s):  
Team Creativity ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Task Knowledge ◽  
Knowledge Diversity ◽  
Status Inequality ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Organizational Tenure ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Moderating Role

We examined the relationship between team task knowledge diversity and team creativity, and the moderating role of team status inequality, with a focus on organizational tenure and rank inequality. By adopting an input–process–output framework, we hypothesized that teams would achieve high levels of creativity when they have a large pool of task-relevant expertise that is differentiated and specialized among team members, but the relationship would be weakened when team members have different statuses. We tested our hypotheses using data from 325 teams of employees at 10 companies in South Korea. Results showed that task knowledge diversity was positively associated with team creativity and a team's status inequality in terms of organizational tenure moderated the relationship in a negative way. Our findings contribute to the literature on team creativity by providing new insights regarding how status inequality, which is almost ubiquitous in workplaces, plays a role in a dynamic team process for creativity.

Abusive supervision and knowledge sharing: the moderating role of organizational tenure

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seckyoung Loretta Kim ◽  
Seung Yeon Son ◽  
Seokhwa Yun
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Abusive Supervision ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Knowledge Sharing Behavior ◽  
Organizational Tenure ◽  
Sharing Behavior ◽  
Moderating Role

Purpose Drawing on social exchange theory (SET) and conservation of resources (COR) theory, the purpose of this paper is to examine the negative consequence of abusive supervision on knowledge sharing. Further, this paper explores the moderating role of organizational tenure in the relationship between abusive supervision and employees’ knowledge sharing behavior applying sense-making theory. Design/methodology/approach The hypotheses were tested using regression analysis across two independent studies conducted in South Korea. Findings The authors found evidence that there was a negative relationship between abusive supervision and employees’ knowledge sharing behavior. Furthermore, the aforementioned relationship was strengthened for those with longer organizational tenure. Originality/value This research deepens our understanding of the negative consequences of abusive supervision on employees’ knowledge sharing behavior by drawing on SET and COR theory. Through two independent studies, the results demonstrated that employees who receive abusive treatment from their supervisors tend to reduce their knowledge sharing behavior. Furthermore, this detrimental effect is stronger for key knowledge providers, namely long-tenured employees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document