Protective effect of small peptides from Periplaneta americana on cyclophosphamide‐induced premature ovarian failure

Author(s):  
Qin Wang ◽  
Huaxin Si ◽  
Rong Fu ◽  
Caihua Kong ◽  
Kena Liu ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 394 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-149
Author(s):  
Walaa Yehia Abdelzaher ◽  
Sara Mohammed Naguib Abdel-Hafez ◽  
Remon Roshdy Rofaeil ◽  
Abdel Hamid Sayed AboBakr Ali ◽  
AbdelRahman Hegazy ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (14) ◽  
pp. 3605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Jiang ◽  
Zhaoyuan Zhang ◽  
Lijun Cha ◽  
Lili Li ◽  
Dantian Zhu ◽  
...  

This study was designed to investigate the protective effect of resveratrol (RES) on premature ovarian failure (POF) and the proliferation of female germline stem cells (FGSCs) at the tissue and cell levels. POF mice were lavaged with RES, and POF ovaries were co-cultured with RES and/or GANT61 in vitro. FGSCs were pretreated with Busulfan and RES and/or GANT61 and co-cultured with M1 macrophages, which were pretreated with RES. The weights of mice and their ovaries, as well as their follicle number, were measured. Ovarian function, antioxidative stress, inflammation, and FGSCs survival were evaluated. RES significantly increased the weights of POF mice and their ovaries as well as the number of follicles, while it decreased the atresia rate of follicles. Higher levels of Mvh, Oct4, SOD2, GPx, and CAT were detected after treatment with RES in vivo and in vitro. RES treatment resulted in significantly lower TNF-α and IL-6 concentrations and an obviously higher IL-10 concentration in the ovaries. In FGSCs, higher Mvh, Oct4, and SOD2 concentrations and lower TNF-α, IL-6, and MDA concentrations were measured in the RES group. Blockage of the Hh signaling pathway reversed the protective effect of RES on FGSCs. In conclusion, RES effectively improved the ovarian function of the POF model and the productive capacity of FGSCs via relieving oxidative stress and inflammation and a mechanism involving the Hh signaling pathway, suggesting that RES is a potential agent against POF and can aid in the survival of FGSCs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengjie Yan ◽  
Youjin Dai ◽  
Heling Fu ◽  
Yuan Zheng ◽  
Dan Bao ◽  
...  

This study was designed to investigate the protective effect of curcumin against d-galactose (d-gal)-induced premature ovarian failure (POF) in mice. A mouse POF model was induced by subcutaneous injection of d-gal (200 mg/kg/day) daily for 42 days. Mice in the curcumin group received both d-gal treatment and intraperitoneal injection of curcumin (100 mg/kg/day) for 42 days. Ovarian function, oxidative stress and apoptosis were evaluated. The P, E2 and SOD levels were higher, and the FSH, LH and MDA levels were significantly lower in the curcumin group than those in the d-gal group. The proportion of primordial follicles was also significantly higher in the curcumin group than that in the d-gal group. In addition, curcumin treatment after d-gal administration resulted in significantly lower Sod2, Cat, 8-OhdG, 4-HNE, NTY and senescence-associated protein P16 expression levels, higher Amh expression levels and less apoptosis in granulosa cells than was observed in the d-gal group. Moreover, the p-Akt, Nrf2 and HO-1 protein expression levels were significantly higher and the apoptosis-related cleaved caspase-3 and -9 protein expression levels were markedly lower in the curcumin group than in the d-gal group. In conclusion, curcumin effectively inhibited d-gal-induced oxidative stress, apoptosis and ovarian injury via a mechanism involving the Nrf2/HO-1 and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways, suggesting that curcumin is a potential protective agent against POF.


2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Manda Ghahremani ◽  
Courtney W Hannah ◽  
Maria Peneherrera ◽  
Karla L Bretherick ◽  
Margo R Fluker ◽  
...  

Background/Purpose: Premature ovarian failure (POF) affects 1% of women with a largely idiopathic and poorly understood etiology. The objective of this study was to identify specific epigenetic alterations by measuring DNA methylation of gene regulatory regions in women with POF vs. controls. Methods: Blood samples were collected from idiopathic POFpatients (Amenorrhea for at least 3 months and 2 serum FSH levels of > 40mIU/ml obtained > 1 month apart prior to age 40) and control women (CW) (healthy pregnancy after age 37 with out a pregnancy loss). Genomic DNA was extracted from EDTA anticoagulated blood and bisulfite converted for analysis using the Illumina Golden Gate Methylation Panel which measures DNA methylation at 1506 CpG sites in the promoter regions of 807 genes in 10 POF and 12 CW. Candidate genes with altered epigenetic marks between POF and CW at a nominal P-value < 0.05 were identified using a t-testcomparison within the Illumina bead studio software. Genes of interest were further analyzed for quantitative methylation at specific CpG sites using pyrosequencing in 30 POF and 30 CW. Results: Comparison of DNA methylation profiles of our initial POF and CW groups identified several genes with statistically significanthyper- or hypo- methylation in the POF group (P < 0.05), including the Androgen Receptor (AR)promoter region, which was significantly hypermethylated. To further validate these results, DNA methylation of the AR gene promoter was quantified bypryosequencing in a larger group of POF and CW. Pyrosequencing further confirmed a significantly higher DNA methylation of the AR promoter region inPOF vs. CW (P=0.007). Conclusions: This is a novel study identifying epigenetic alterations in POF. The hypermethylation of the AR gene in POF patients may cause decreased level of the AR in these women. This is especially interesting given a recent report of induced POF in AR deficient mice^1. Specific epigenetic markers, as identified by DNA methylation array profiling in blood, may serve as useful biomarkers for POF and other fertility disorders. However, it will need to be determined if these methylation changes are present prior to diagnosis, or are a consequence of menopause itself. Reference: 1.Hiroko S. et al. Premature ovarian failure in androgenreceptor deficient mice. PNAS;103:224-9


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document