Mechanism of improvement in atrial functional mitral regurgitation after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Three‐dimensional analysis using multislice computed tomography

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuta Tsujisaka ◽  
Shuichiro Kaji ◽  
Kitae Kim ◽  
Misun Pak ◽  
Yasuhiro Sasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Dimensional Analysis ◽  
Multislice Computed Tomography ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation

scholarly journals Association between functional mitral regurgitation and recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation: a prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 030006052110143
Author(s):  
Fusheng Ke ◽  
Yinhui Huang ◽  
Zhexiu Jin ◽  
Lei Huang ◽  
Qiang Xiong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Objective The present study aimed to investigate the effect of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) on recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation. Methods This prospective cohort study comprised 107 patients with PAF. The patients were divided into the FMR and non-FMR groups. FMR was assessed by Doppler echocardiography before index ablation. All patients initially underwent circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) and were followed up for 12 months after ablation. PAF, atrial tachycardia, or atrial flutter served as the endpoint indicator. Results The median duration of PAF was 24 (3–60) months. Binary logistic univariate and multivariate analyses showed that FMR was not a risk factor for recurrence of catheter ablation for PAF (hazard ratio=0.758, 95% confidence interval: 0.191–3.004; hazard ratio=0.665, 95% confidence interval: 0.134–3.300, respectively). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the groups. Fifteen (15/107, 14%) cases of PAF were triggered by the pulmonary vein. Three (3/107, 2.8%) cases of PAF were triggered by the superior vena cava. Conclusions FMR is not an independent risk factor for predicting recurrence of catheter ablation for PAF. FMR does not affect patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for PAF.

scholarly journals The impact of substrate and trigger ablation for reduction of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Watanabe ◽  
T Yamada ◽  
S Tamaki ◽  
M Yano ◽  
T Hayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is not uncommon in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Left atrial (LA) substrate remodeling and corresponding mitral valve annulus dilation has been reported as the most possible cause of FMR. Percutaneous catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for AF. Although significant FMR could be improved by sinus restoration, patients with mitral regurgitation were more likely to experience recurrent AF post ablation, especially those with significant mitral regurgitation. There is no information available on the efficacy of CA for persistent AF in patients with FMR. Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the predictors of FMR improvement by CA and to determine the efficacy of substrate and trigger CA for persistent AF in patients with FMR. Methods We prospectively studied 512 consecutive patients admitted for persistent AF ablation from the EARNEST-PVI (Prospective Multicenter Randomized Study of Effect of Extensive Ablation on Recurrence in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Pulmonary Vein Isolation) trial. On admission, enrolled patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or PVI-plus additional ablation (linear ablation or/and CFAE ablation). Of the 512 patients, we studied 94 patients with preoperative echocardiography showing moderate or greater baseline FMR. FMR grades were classified into 5 grades (0/1/2/3/4). The FMR improvement group (FMRI(+)) was defined as a case in which the FMR was improved by two or more grades compared the preoperative echocardiography and the one year follow-up examination. Results Of the 94 patients, 42 were in the PVI group and 52 were in the PVI-plus additional ablation group. There were 30 cases in the FMRI(+) group and 64 cases in the FMRI(−) group. There were no significant baseline differences in age, sinus rhythm maintenance, plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, left ventricular diastolic dimension, or left atrium dimension between the FMRI(+) and FMRI(−) groups. AF duration was significantly shorter in the FMRI(+) group than FMRI(−) groups (5.8±9.4 months vs 12.4±15.4 months, p<0.0001). In addition, significantly more additional ablation cases were observed in the FMRI(+) group than in the FMRI(−) group (73.3% vs 46.8%, p=0.016). In multivariate analyses, only additional ablation was an independent predictor of FMRI (odds ratio 0.226 95% CI 0.081–0.626; p=0.004). Conclusions Catheter ablation is a valid option for the treatment of AF in patients with functional MR and additional substrate and trigger ablation were the only independent predictor of FMR improvement. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document