scholarly journals To understand a meta‐analysis, best read the fine print

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin L. Greason
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fine Print

scholarly journals To understand a meta-analysis, best read the fine print.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Greason
Keyword(s):  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
P Value ◽  
Point Estimates ◽  
Individual Point ◽  
Equal Importance ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Fine Print

The results of a meta-analysis are more than just the reported odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and P value. Of equal importance is the fine print of the study which should include assessment of risk of bias, certainty in evidence, and heterogeneity in the individual point estimates and confidence intervals. These areas all have influence on the quality of the data in the analysis. Reading and understanding the fine print is important.

Morbidity and mortality from elective surgery for asymptomatic, unruptured, intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis

1994 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 837-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph T. King ◽  
Jesse A. Berlin ◽  
Eugene S. Flamm
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Fine Print

✓ A meta-analysis of the literature on morbidity and mortality from elective surgery for asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms was performed to obtain a more precise, accurate, and generalizable estimate of operative risk than is currently available. The authors used a MEDLINE search from 1966 to 1992, supplemented with manual searches, to locate studies containing four or more patients who had undergone elective surgery for these aneurysms. Only patients with asymptomatic, unruptured aneurysms were eligible for inclusion. Demographic and clinical data were collected from each series; aneurysms were categorized as incidental, multiple, or unclassifiable. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and logistical regression. There were twenty-eight articles containing data on 733 patients who met eligibility criteria. The mean patient age was 48.6 ± 5.5 years, and 55% ± 17% of the patients were women. There was a total of 30 deficits for a morbidity rate of 4.1% (95% confidence interval 2.8, 5.8%) and a total of seven deaths for a mortality rate of 1.0% (95% confidence interval 0.4, 2.0%). There was insufficient statistical power to detect a difference in morbidity or mortality rates related to study size, year of publication, or potential risk factors such as patient sex or age, or aneurysm size, location, or category (incidental, multiple, or unclassifiable) (for all analyses, p ≥ 0.16). Elective surgery for asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms, as reported in the literature, has low rates of morbidity (4.1%) and mortality (1.0%). At present there is insufficient detail in the literature to understand the impact of patient and aneurysm characteristics on elective surgical outcomes.

The effects of low-ratio n-6/n-3 PUFA on biomarkers of inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Wei ◽  
Yan Meng ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Liyong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Fatty Acid ◽  
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid ◽  
Inflammation Markers ◽  
Pufa Supplementation ◽  
Long Chain

The purpose of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if low-ratio n-6/n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation affects serum inflammation markers based on current studies.

Chronic Pain: Fundamental Scientific Considerations, Specifically for Legal Claims

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Barth
Keyword(s):  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Driving Forces ◽  
Psychological Treatment ◽  
Dominant Role ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
General Medicine ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Problematic Relationship

Abstract Scientific findings have indicated that psychological and social factors are the driving forces behind most chronic benign pain presentations, especially in a claim context, and are relevant to at least three of the AMA Guides publications: AMA Guides to Evaluation of Disease and Injury Causation, AMA Guides to Work Ability and Return to Work, and AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. The author reviews and summarizes studies that have identified the dominant role of financial, psychological, and other non–general medicine factors in patients who report low back pain. For example, one meta-analysis found that compensation results in an increase in pain perception and a reduction in the ability to benefit from medical and psychological treatment. Other studies have found a correlation between the level of compensation and health outcomes (greater compensation is associated with worse outcomes), and legal systems that discourage compensation for pain produce better health outcomes. One study found that, among persons with carpal tunnel syndrome, claimants had worse outcomes than nonclaimants despite receiving more treatment; another examined the problematic relationship between complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and compensation and found that cases of CRPS are dominated by legal claims, a disparity that highlights the dominant role of compensation. Workers’ compensation claimants are almost never evaluated for personality disorders or mental illness. The article concludes with recommendations that evaluators can consider in individual cases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document