scholarly journals Mobilization of an anomalous retroaortic coronary artery to prevent myocardial ischemia after aortic valve replacement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Máximo ◽  
Paulo Pinho ◽  
Jorge Casanova
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Myocardial Ischemia ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement

scholarly journals Mobilization of an anomalous retro aortic coronary artery to prevent myocardial ischemia after aortic valve replacement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Máximo ◽  
Paulo Pinho ◽  
Jorge Casanova
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Myocardial Ischemia ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Right Coronary Artery ◽  
Valvular Surgery

During valvular surgery, abnormal coronary distribution, especially if unidentified by preoperative exams, may put coronary arteries at risk of damage. In this case report, we describe the approach to an anomalous right coronary artery during aortic valve replacement.

Early and Late Mortality of Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement After Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Circulation ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 92 (9) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sayid F. Fighali ◽  
Amilcar Avendaño ◽  
MacArthur A. Elayda ◽  
Vei Vei Lee ◽  
Cesar Hernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Artery Bypass Graft ◽  
Late Mortality

Use and outcomes of emergency treatment strategies in patients with aortic valve stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M Piepenburg ◽  
K Kaier ◽  
C Olivier ◽  
M Zehender ◽  
C Bode ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Aortic Valve Stenosis ◽  
Emergency Treatment ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Introduction and aim Current emergency treatment options for severe aortic valve stenosis include surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and balloon valvuloplasty (BV). So far no larger patient population has been evaluated regarding clinical characteristics and outcomes. Therefore we aimed to describe the use and outcome of the three therapy options in a broad registry study. Method and results Using German nationwide electronic health records, we evaluated emergency admissions of symptomatic patients with severe aortic valve stenosis between 2014 and 2017. Patients were grouped according to SAVR, TAVR or BV only treatments. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were stroke, acute kidney injury, periprocedural pacemaker implantation, delirium and prolonged mechanical ventilation >48 hours. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses including baseline characteristics were performed to assess outcome risks. 8,651 patients with emergency admission for severe aortic valve stenosis were identified. The median age was 79 years and comorbidities included NYHA classes III-IV (52%), coronary artery disease (50%), atrial fibrillation (41%) and diabetes mellitus (33%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 6.2% during a mean length of stay of 22±15 days. TAVR was the most common treatment (6,357 [73.5%]), followed by SAVR (1,557 [18%]) and BV (737 8.5%]). Patients who were treated with TAVR or BV were significantly older than patients with SAVR (mean age 81.3±6.5 and 81.2±6.9 versus 67.2±11.0 years, p<0.001), had more relevant comorbidities (coronary artery disease 52–91% vs. 21.8%; p<0.001), worse NYHA classes III-IV (55–65% vs. 34.5%; p<0.001) and higher EuroSCORES (24.6±14.3 and 23.4±13.9 vs. 9.5±7.6; p<0.001) than SAVR patients. Patients treated with BV only had the highest in-hospital mortality compared with TAVR or SAVR (20.9% vs. 5.1 and 3.5%; p<0.001). Compared with BV only, SAVR patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14–0.46; p<0.001) and TAVR patients (aOR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28–0.50; p<0.001) had a lower risk for in-hospital mortality. Conclusion In-hospital mortality for emergency patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis is high. Our results showed that BV only therapy was associated with highest mortality, which is in line with current research. Yet, there is a trend towards more TAVR interventions and this study might imply that balloon valvuloplasty alone is insufficient. The role of BV as a bridging strategy to TAVR or SAVR needs to be further investigated. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Heart Center Freiburg University, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

scholarly journals Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a patient with aortic stenosis and severe coronary artery disease: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Majid Ahsan ◽  
Rolf Alexander Jánosi ◽  
Tienush Rassaf ◽  
Alexander Lind
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) often present with multiple comorbidities and suffer from critical coronary artery disease (CAD). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the therapy of choice for moderate to high-risk patients. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (v-a-ECMO) offers the possibility of temporary cardiac support to manage life-threatening critical situations. Case summary Here, we describe the management of a patient with severe AS and CAD with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We used v-a-ECMO as an emergency strategy in cardiogenic shock during a high-risk coronary intervention to stabilize the patient, and as a further bridge to TAVR. Discussion Very high-risk patients with severe AS are unlikely to tolerate the added risk of surgical aortic valve replacement. Using ECMO may help them to benefit from TAVR as the only treatment option available.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document