Venopulmonary artery extracorporeal lung assist in repair of traumatic aortic injury via left thoracotomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 3575-3577
Author(s):  
Hisato Ito ◽  
Saki Bessho ◽  
Naoki Yamamoto ◽  
Koji Hirano ◽  
Yu Shomura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Injury ◽  
Left Thoracotomy ◽  
Extracorporeal Lung Assist

MR Imaging Findings of Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury

2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 351
Author(s):  
Min Jee Sohn ◽  
Joon Beon Seo ◽  
Hyun Woo Koo ◽  
Han Na Nho ◽  
Meong Gun Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mr Imaging ◽  
Aortic Injury ◽  
Imaging Findings ◽  
Thoracic Aortic Injury

Iatrogenic thoracic aortic injury in esophagectomy – a case report and literature review

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 256-259
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Thoracic Aorta ◽  
Aortic Rupture ◽  
Hypovolemic Shock ◽  
Left Lung ◽  
Aortic Injury ◽  
Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy ◽  
Thoracic Aortic Injury

Introduction: This case report describes bleeding from an iatrogenic thoracic aortic injury in minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Case report: A 53-year-old man underwent neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus with positive lymph nodes. PET/CT showed only a partial response after neoadjuvant therapy. Minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the semi-prone position with selective intuba- tion of the left lung was performed. However, massive bleeding from the thoracic aorta during separation of the tumor resulted in conversion from minimally invasive to conventional right thoracotomy. The bleeding was caused by a five millimeter rupture of the thoracic aorta. The thoracic aortic rupture was treated by suture with a gore prosthesis in collaboration with a vascular surgeon. Esophagestomy was not completed due to hypovolemic shock. Hybrid transhiatal esophagectomy was performed on the seventh day after the primary operation. Definitive histological examination showed T3N3M0 adenocarcinoma. Conclusion: Esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus is one of the most difficult operations in general surgery in which surgical bleeding from the surrounding structures cannot be excluded. Aortic hemorrhage is hemodynamically significant in all cases and requires urgent surgical treatment.

Cannulation of the Ascending Aorta in Left Thoracotomy for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. E81-E83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riza Turkoz ◽  
Oner Gulcan ◽  
Orhan Demirturk ◽  
Ayda Turkoz
Keyword(s):  
Ascending Aorta ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Left Thoracotomy ◽  
Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

Use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) as a bridge to endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI).

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Chiarini
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Aortic Rupture ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Aortic Injury ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Traumatic Lesion ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aortic Injuries ◽  
Accepted Practice ◽  
Endovascular Balloon Occlusion

BAAI is a rare but challenging traumatic lesion. Since BAAI is difficult to suspect and diagnose, frequently lethal and associated to multiorgan injuries, its management is objective of research and discussion. REBOA is an accepted practice in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Conversely, blunt aortic injuries are the currently most cited contraindications for the use of REBOA in trauma, together with thoracic lesions. We reported a case of BAAI safely managed in our Trauma Center at Maggiore Hospital in Bologna (Italy) utilizing REBOA as a bridge to endovascular repair, since there were no imminent indications for laparotomy. Despite formal contraindication to placing REBOA in aortic rupture, we hypothesized that this approach could be feasible and relatively safe when introduced in a resuscitative damage control protocol.

scholarly journals Two uncommon cases of thoracic aortic injury caused by rib fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (S8) ◽  
pp. S1113-S1118
Author(s):  
Hao Xie ◽  
Shaonan Ning ◽  
Nan Li ◽  
Lei Song ◽  
Yanbin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Injury ◽  
Rib Fractures ◽  
Thoracic Aortic Injury

Unusual complication of late presentation deceleration aortic injury

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Risher ◽  
Samuel Stevenson ◽  
Raman Danrad ◽  
Edmund K. Kerut ◽  
Robert Batson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Injury ◽  
Late Presentation ◽  
Unusual Complication

scholarly journals TEVAR versus open repair of blunt traumatic descending aortic injury in polytraumatic patients involved in motor vehicle accidents

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imthiaz Manoly ◽  
Mohamed El Tahan ◽  
Maymoona Al Shuaibi ◽  
Fatimah Adel ◽  
Mohammed Al Harbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Aortic Injury ◽  
Motor Vehicle Accidents ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Vehicle Accidents ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the standard-of-care for treating traumatic aortic injury (TAI). Few retrospective studies compared TEVAR to open repair in blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI). Our objectives were to compare the early outcomes of TEVAR for blunt traumatic descending aortic injury to open repair (OR) in polytraumatic patients involved in motor vehicle accidents (MVA). Results Between February 2005 and April 2017, 71 patients with TAI due to MVA presented to our institution. All patients with descending aortic injuries were considered for open repair (n = 41) or TEVAR (n = 30) if there was no contraindication. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes were stroke, paraplegia, intensive care unit (ICU), and hospital stay. The mean age was 28.4 ± 10.1 years in the OR group and 33.3 ± 16.6 years in TEVAR-group (P = 0.13). The injury severity scores were 41 ± 10 in the OR group and 33 ± 17 in the TEVAR group (P = 0.03). Patients in the OR group underwent emergency repair with a mean time of 0.56 ± 0.18 days from arrival. The TEVAR group had a longer time interval between arrival and procedure (2.1 ± 1.7 days, P = 0.001). The OR group had more blood transfusion (24 (58.5%) vs. 8 (27.5%), P = 0.002), renal impairment (6 (14.6%) vs. 1 (5.50%), P = 0.23), and wound infection (21 (51.2%) vs. 3 (10%), P < 0.001). Three TEVAR patients had a perioperative stroke compared to two patients in the OR group (P = 0.64). There was no difference in the mean ICU (6 ± 8.9 vs. 5.3 ± 2.9 days; P = 0.1) or hospital stay (20.1 ± 12.3 vs. 20.1 ± 18.3, P = 0.62) between the two groups. There were four deaths in the OR group and none in the TEVAR group (P = 0.13). Conclusion The results of TEVAR were comparable with the open repair for traumatic aortic injury with good early postoperative outcomes. TEVAR repair could be associated with lower mortality, blood transfusion, and infective complications. However, the complexity of the injury and technical challenges were higher in the open group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document