Impact of Structural Valve Deterioration on Outcomes in the Cryopreserved Mitral Homograft Valve

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 616-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Nappi ◽  
Cristiano Spadaccio ◽  
Massimo Chello ◽  
Mario Lusini ◽  
Cristophe Acar
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 01-05
Author(s):  
Marco Angelillis

Transcatheter valve in valve (ViV) implantation actually represents a valid alternative to surgical reinterventions in patients with previous surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). In patients less than 80 years old, it is crucial to correctly position the new valve leaving a feasible and easy access to coronary ostia, both for future percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than for a future possible TAVinTAV procedure. We report a 71 year old man with prior AVR presented with structural valve deterioration (SVD) leading to severe aortic stenosis. In order to guarantee comfortable coronary access we aligned, the commissures of the new percutaneous valve with the ones of the surgical bioprothesis by reconstructing the headframes of the surgical bioprosthesis with computer tomography (CT) and fluoro-CT.


1980 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.H. Wain ◽  
R. Greco ◽  
A. Ignegeri ◽  
E. Bodnar ◽  
D.N. Ross

Homograft valve replacement of the diseased aortic valve with a homologous aortic valve inserted in the sub-coronary position was first performed in July 1962 (Ross 1962). The procedure of transferring the patients autologous pulmonary valve to the aortic position has been used since 1967 (Ross 1967). The long term performance of homograft valves has not been regarded as satisfactory in some centres (Cope-land 1977, Anderson & Hancock 1977) whereas others have shown it to be an excellent valve replacement (Barratt-Boyes, 1977, Bodnar et al 1979). The differing experiences may be the results of alternative methods of sterilization, preservation and surgical insertion. This paper presents information on isolated aortic valve replacements with either homograft or autograft valves over a 15 year period.


1999 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 384-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motohiro Kawauchi ◽  
Masahiro Saigusa ◽  
Akira Furuse ◽  
Shinichi Takamoto

1966 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 516
Author(s):  
B. G. Barratt-Boyes ◽  
J. B. Lowe ◽  
D. S. Cole ◽  
D. T. Kelly

Chirurgia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimasa Sakamoto ◽  
Michio Yoshitake ◽  
Yoko Matsumura ◽  
Fumiaki Murayama ◽  
Kazuhiro Hashimoto

Author(s):  
Lorenzo Gonzalez-Lavin ◽  
J. Bianchi ◽  
D. Graf ◽  
S. Amini ◽  
C. I. Gordon

2010 ◽  
pp. 503-519
Author(s):  
Charles A. Yankah ◽  
M. Pasic ◽  
Henryk Siniawski ◽  
J. Stein ◽  
C. Detschades ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e029109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Persson ◽  
Gustaf Edgren ◽  
Magnus Dalén ◽  
Natalie Glaser ◽  
Martin L Olsson ◽  
...  

ObjectiveBlood type A antigen on porcine aortic bioprostheses might initiate an immune reaction leading to an increased frequency of structural valve deterioration in patients with blood type B or O. The aim was to analyse the association between ABO blood type and porcine bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration.DesignObservational nationwide cohort study.SettingSwedish population-based study.ParticipantsAdult patients (n=3417) who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement and received porcine bioprosthetic aortic valves between 1995 and 2012 from the Swedish Web system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies register. The study database was enriched with information from other national registers.ExposureThe patients were categorised into type A/AB and type B/O blood groups.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrimary outcome measure was aortic valve reoperation, and secondary outcomes were heart failure and all-cause mortality. We report risk estimates that account for the competing risk of death.ResultsIn total, 3417 patients were identified: 1724 (50.5%) with blood type A/AB and 1693 (49.5%) with blood type B/O. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The cumulative incidence of aortic valve reoperation was 3.4% (95% CI 2.5% to 4.4%) and 3.6% (95% CI 2.6% to 4.6%) in the type B/O and the A/AB group, respectively, at 15 years of follow-up (absolute risk difference: −0.2% (95% CI −1.5% to 1.2%)). There was no significantly increased risk for aortic valve reoperation in patients with blood type B/O compared with type A/AB (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.45). There was no significant difference in absolute or relative risk of heart failure or death between the groups.ConclusionsWe found no significant association between patient blood type and clinical manifestations of structural valve deterioration following porcine aortic valve replacement. Our findings suggest that it is safe to use porcine bioprosthetic valves without consideration of ABO blood type in the recipient.Trial registration numberNCT02276950


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document