Content validation study of nursing interventions intended to prevent cardiovascular events in diabetic patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 366-368
Author(s):  
Rita de Cassia Gengo e Silva ◽  
Natany da Costa Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
Validation Study ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Nursing Interventions ◽  
Content Validation

scholarly journals Content validation of the nursing intervention Dialysis Access Maintenance

Rev Rene ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. e67917
Author(s):  
Letícia Mattos Gonçalves ◽  
Silvia Maria de Sá Basílio Lins ◽  
Priscilla Alfradique de Souza ◽  
Joyce Martins Arimatéa Branco Tavares ◽  
Bruna Maiara Ferreira Barreto Pires ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Validation Study ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Positive Reinforcement ◽  
Nursing Intervention ◽  
Nursing Interventions ◽  
Dialysis Access ◽  
Content Validation ◽  
Validity Index ◽  
Maintenance Intervention ◽  
Qualitative Part

Objective: to validate the content of the Dialysis Access Maintenance intervention. Methods: methodological validation study, composed of 28 participants who analyzed each activity of the intervention through the Likert scale, considering the importance and objectivity, which provided the calculation of the index of validity of content and frequency to assess the realization of the activities. Results: the 11 intervention activities were validated. Of these, seven obtained a content validity index ≥ 0.8 and four, > 0.5 and < 0.8. In the qualitative part, three categories emerged: 1) Positive reinforcement of the Nursing Interventions Classification activity; 2) Contribution to improve the Nursing Interventions Classification activity; and 3) Disagreement regarding the activity proposed by the Nursing Interventions Classification. Conclusion: all activities were considered important and objective, validating the intervention.

Circulating Stem/Progenitor Cells as Prognostic Biomarkers in Macro- and Microvascular Disease: A Narrative Review of Prospective Observational Studies

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (35) ◽  
pp. 4507-4517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Rigato ◽  
Gian Paolo Fadini
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
English Language ◽  
Microvascular Disease ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cell Phenotypes

Background: Circulating progenitor cells (CPCs) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are immature cells involved in vascular repair and related to many aspects of macro and microvascular disease. <p> Objective: We aimed to review studies reporting the prognostic role of CPCs/EPCs measurement on development of cardiovascular disease and microangiopathy. <p> Methods and Results: We reviewed the English language literature for prospective observational studies reporting the future development of cardiovascular disease or microangiopathy in patients having a baseline determination of CPCs/EPCs. We retrieved 34 studied reporting on cardiovascular outcomes and 2 studies reporting on microvascular outcomes. Overall, a reduced baseline level of CPCs/EPCs was associated with a significant increased risk of cardiovascular events, all-cause death, and onset/progression of microangiopathy. The most predictive phenotypes were CD34+ and CD34+CD133+. The main limitation was related to the high heterogeneity among studies in terms of patient characteristics and cell phenotypes. <p> Conclusion: The present review shows that a reduced level of circulating progenitor cells is a risk factor for the development of future cardiovascular events and death. In addition, low CPCs/EPCs levels predict the onset or worsening of microalbuminuria and retinopathy in diabetic patients.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus at high cardiovascular risk: 5-year follow-up of the prospective multicenter BARDOT trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Caobelli ◽  
◽  
Philip Haaf ◽  
Gianluca Haenny ◽  
Matthias Pfisterer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Perfusion Scintigraphy ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk

Abstract Background The Basel Asymptomatic High-Risk Diabetics’ Outcome Trial (BARDOT) demonstrated that asymptomatic diabetic patients with an abnormal myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) were at increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at 2-year follow-up. It remains unclear whether this finding holds true even for a longer follow-up. Methods Four hundred patients with type 2 diabetes, neither history nor symptoms of coronary artery disease (CAD), were evaluated clinically and with MPS. Patients were followed up for 5 years. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or late coronary revascularization. Results At baseline, an abnormal MPS (SSS ≥ 4 or SDS ≥ 2) was found in 87 of 400 patients (22%). MACE within 5 years occurred in 14 patients with abnormal MPS (16.1%) and in 22 with normal scan (1.7%), p = 0.009; 15 deaths were recorded. Patients with completely normal MPS (SSS and SDS = 0) had lower rates of MACEs than patients with abnormal scans (2.5% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.032). Patients with abnormal MPS who had undergone revascularization had a lower mortality rate and a better event-free survival from MI and revascularization than patients with abnormal MPS who had either undergone medical therapy only or could not be revascularized (p = 0.002). Conclusions MPS may have prognostic value in asymptomatic diabetic patients at high cardiovascular risk over a follow-up period of 5 years. Patients with completely normal MPS have a low event rate and may not need retesting within 5 years. Patients with an abnormal MPS have higher event rates and may benefit from a combined medical and revascularization approach.

scholarly journals Using biomarkers to identify diabetic patients with multiple silent cardiac abnormalities

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
V.H Chong ◽  
J.S.S Singh ◽  
E Dow ◽  
R.J McCrimmon ◽  
C.C Lang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Public Institution ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Cardiac Abnormality ◽  
Cardiac Abnormalities

Abstract Background Primary prevention of cardiovascular events in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) needs to improve due to risk of cardiovascular events. A major problem in T2DM is the high incidence of silent yet potentially lethal cardiac abnormalities, namely myocardial ischaemia (MI), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), and left atrial enlargement (LAE). All these independently predict cardiovascular events and mortality. There is not a single study with comprehensive enough cardiac phenotyping to document the prevalence of all the aforementioned 5 cardiac abnormalities. To improve primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetes, we need to first identify the type of silent cardiac abnormality and treat accordingly. However cardiac phenotyping in all people with T2DM would be prohibitively expensive. Purpose Our study examines the prevalence of all 5 cardiac abnormalities, and the accuracy of biomarkers in identifying them in a cohort of patients with well-controlled T2DM and blood pressure (BP) with no known cardiovascular symptom or disease. Methods This is a cross-sectional study of randomly selected patients with T2DM with no known cardiovascular symptom or disease, clinic BP or average 24-hour BP ≤140/80mmHg, and HbA1c ≤64mmol/mol. Patients with renal impairment, atrial fibrillation, moderate to severe valvular heart disease were excluded. All participants underwent transthoracic echocardiogram, electrocardiogram and dobutamine stress echocardiogram (DSE). Those who did not tolerate DSE or whose DSE was inconclusive, a myocardial perfusion scan or computed tomography coronary angiogram was done. Biomarkers such as BNP, NT-proBNP, high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin I (hs-cTnI), and high sensitivity cardiac Troponin T (hs-cTnT) were measured. Results Of 246 participants (mean age 66 years, 63% male), 141 (57.3%) had silent cardiac abnormalities. 90 (36.6%) had 1 cardiac abnormality, 44 (17.9%) had 2 cardiac abnormalities and 7 (2.8%) had 3 cardiac abnormalities. The most prevalent abnormality was LAE, n=106 (43.1%); followed by LVH, n=71 (28.9%); LVDD, n=13 (5.3%); MI, n=8 (3.3%); LVSD, n=1 (0.4%). Both NT-proBNP and hs-cTnI performed best in detecting silent cardiac abnormalities with p-values of 0.02 and 0.0004, and AUC 0.66 and 0.68 respectively. Increasing NT-proBNP (p=0.002) and hs-cTnI (p=0.002) levels correlated to increasing number of concomitant cardiac abnormalities. Our key new finding is that biomarkers identify those with multiple silent cardiac abnormalities. Conclusion BNP and high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin appear to identify those with multiple silent cardiac abnormalities which may make them useful screening tests so that cardiac investigations are focused on this high-risk subset, with a view to intensifying potential therapies on this subset to reduce the cardiotoxic effect of diabetes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Chief Scientist Office

scholarly journals Effect of Low-Dose Aspirin on Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Japanese Diabetic Patients at High Risk

2013 ◽  
Vol 77 (12) ◽  
pp. 3023-3028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadanori Okada ◽  
Takeshi Morimoto ◽  
Hisao Ogawa ◽  
Mio Sakuma ◽  
Hirofumi Soejima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Prevention ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Dose Aspirin ◽  
Low Dose Aspirin

scholarly journals Control of blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes

Open Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 304-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hernando Vargas-Uricoechea ◽  
Manuel Felipe Cáceres-Acosta
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Pharmacological Therapy ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Channel Blockers ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
The Impact

AbstractHigh blood pressure in patients with diabetes mellitus results in a significant increase in the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. The current evidence regarding the impact of intervention on blood pressure levels (in accordance with a specific threshold) is not particularly robust. Blood pressure control is more difficult to achieve in patients with diabetes than in non-diabetic patients, and requires using combination therapy in most patients. Different management guidelines recommend initiating pharmacological therapy with values >140/90 mm/Hg; however, an optimal cut point for this population has not been established. Based on the available evidence, it appears that blood pressure targets will probably have to be lower than <140/90mmHg, and that values approaching 130/80mmHg should be recommended. Initial treatment of hypertension in diabetes should include drug classes demonstrated to reduce cardiovascular events; i.e., angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, diuretics, or dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers. The start of therapy must be individualized in accordance with the patient's baseline characteristics, and factors such as associated comorbidities, race, and age, inter alia.

Cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S4-S8
Author(s):  
Erland Erdmann
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Insulin Resistance ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Increased Risk

Diabetes is a common risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Coronary heart disease and left ventricular dysfunction are more common in diabetic patients than in non-diabetic patients, and diabetic patients benefit less from revascularisation procedures. This increased risk can only partly be explained by the adverse effects of diabetes on established risk factors; hence, a substantial part of the excess risk must be attributable to direct effects of hyperglycaemia and diabetes. In type 2 diabetes, hyperinsulinaemia, insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia have a number of potential adverse effects, including effects on endothelial function and coagulation. Risk factor modification has been shown to reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes; indeed, diabetic patients appear to benefit more in absolute terms than non-diabetic patients. There is thus a strong case for intensive treatment of risk factors, including insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia, in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document