Measuring patient participation in surgical treatment decision-making from healthcare professionals' perspective

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 482-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liv-Helen Heggland ◽  
Aslaug Mikkelsen ◽  
Torvald Øgaard ◽  
Kjell Hausken
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Patient Participation ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Treatment Decision Making

scholarly journals Patient Participation in Surgical Treatment Decision Making from the Patients' Perspective: Validation of an Instrument

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liv-Helen Heggland ◽  
Torvald Øgaard ◽  
Aslaug Mikkelsen ◽  
Kjell Hausken
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Patient Participation ◽  
Information Dissemination ◽  
Psychometric Testing ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
And Control ◽  
Patients Perspective

The aim of this paper is to describe the development of a new, brief, easy-to-administer self-reported instrument designed to assess patient participation in decision making in surgical treatment. We describe item generation, psychometric testing, and validity of the instrument. The final scale consisted of four factors: information dissemination (5 items), formulation of options (4 items), integration of information (4 items), and control (3 items). The analysis demonstrated a reasonable level of construct validity and reliability. The instrument applies to patients in surgical wards and can be used to identify the health services that are being provided and the areas that could strengthen patient participation.

Physicians' views on the influence of patient participation on treatment decisions - an explorative study

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elina Jaakkola
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Participation ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Role Expectations ◽  
Customer Participation ◽  
Health Care Managers ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Explorative Study ◽  
Significant Difference

While patient participation in treatment decisions is increasingly advocated in medical literature, patient demand has been considered to cause unnecessary prescribing. Using the concept of customer participation as discussed in services marketing and management literature as a theoretical base, the paper analyses the influence of patient participation on the medical service process and treatment decision-making. A qualitative, explorative study was conducted to investigate American and British physicians' views on patient participation in the treatment of osteoporosis and schizophrenia. It became evident that in the cases of both osteoporosis and schizophrenia, patients influence prescribing decisions despite the significant difference in their willingness and ability to participate. The manifestations of patient participation were divided into three groups: (1) resources, such as the patient's condition and information about it, and his/her preconceived notions and preferences, (2) actions, such as preparing for the service, negotiating decisions and implementing the treatment, and (3) the patient's role expectations and inclination to participate. The influence of such manifestations on prescribing decision-making is discussed in detail, and differences between the studied illnesses are explained. Implications to health-care managers and practitioners are discussed.

scholarly journals To Share or Not to Share: Malaysian Healthcare Professionals' Views on Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment Decision Making Roles

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e0142812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yew Kong Lee ◽  
Ping Yein Lee ◽  
Ai Theng Cheong ◽  
Chirk Jenn Ng ◽  
Khatijah Lim Abdullah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer Treatment ◽  
Treatment Decision Making

Patient and surgeon correlates of shared decision making for surgical breast cancer treatment

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6031-6031
Author(s):  
S. Hawley ◽  
P. Lantz ◽  
B. Salem ◽  
A. Fagerlin ◽  
N. Janz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Treatment ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
The Right

6031 Background: The choice of surgical breast cancer treatment represents an opportunity for shared decision making (SDM), since both mastectomy and breast conserving surgery are viable options. Yet women vary in their desire for involvement in this decision. Correlates of SDM and/or the level of involvement in breast cancer surgical treatment decision-making are not known. Methods: Breast cancer patients of Detroit and Los Angeles SEER registries were mailed a questionnaire shortly after diagnosis in 2002 (N = 1,800, RR: 77%). Their responses were merged with a surgeon survey (N = 456, RR: 80%) for a dataset of 1,547 patients of 318 surgeons. Surgical treatment decision making was categorized into: 1) surgeon-based; 2) shared; or 3) patient-based. The concordance between a woman’s self-reported actual and desired decisional involvement was categorized as having more, less, or the right amount of involvement. Decision making and concordance were each analyzed as three-level dependent variables using multinomial logistic regression controlling for clustering within surgeons. Independent variables included patient clinical, treatment and demographic factors, surgeon demographic and practice-related factors, and a measure of surgeon-patient communication. Results: 37% of women reported the surgery decision was shared, 25% that it was surgeon-based, and 38% that it was patient-based. Two-thirds experienced the right amount of involvement, while 13% had less and 19% had more. Compared to women who reported a shared decision, those with surgeon-based decision were significantly (p < 0.05) more likely to have male surgeons, and those reporting a patient-based decision were more likely to have received mastectomy vs. breast conserving surgery. Women who were less involved in the surgery decision than they wanted were younger and had less education, while those with more involvement (vs. the right amount) more often had male surgeons. Patient-surgeon communication was associated with decisional involvement. Conclusions: Correlates of SDM and decisional involvement relating to surgical breast cancer treatment differ. Determining patients’ desired role in decision making may as important as achieving a shared decision for evaluating perceived quality of care. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Factors associated with patient involvement in surgical treatment decision making for breast cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah T. Hawley ◽  
Paula M. Lantz ◽  
Nancy K. Janz ◽  
Barbara Salem ◽  
Monica Morrow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Treatment Decision Making
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document