scholarly journals A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Hand Hygiene Compliance of Nurses in the Hospital Setting

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olena Doronina RN ◽  
Denise Jones ◽  
Marianna Martello ◽  
Alain Biron ◽  
Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Improve Hand Hygiene ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

scholarly journals Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in emergency departments: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
H-J. Seo ◽  
K-Y. Sohng ◽  
S.O. Chang ◽  
S.K. Chaung ◽  
J.S. Won ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Improve Hand Hygiene ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

scholarly journals Intervenciones para mejorar el grado de cumplimiento de la higiene de manos en los servicios de urgencias

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 462-466
Author(s):  
Pablo Chico Sánchez ◽  
María del Mar Seguí Crespo
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Hospital Infection ◽  
Review Journal ◽  
Improve Hand Hygiene ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

Este trabajo es un comentario del artículo: Seo HJ, Sohng KY, Chang SO, Chaung SK, Wone JS, Choi MJ. Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in emergency departments: a systematic review. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2019;102(4):394-406. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2019.03.013

scholarly journals Improving hand hygiene in hospitals: comparing the effect of a nudge and a boost on protocol compliance

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Henrico van Roekel ◽  
Joanne Reinhard ◽  
Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Hospital Nurses ◽  
Improve Hand Hygiene ◽  
Policy Practice ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Risk Literacy ◽  
Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Hospital Wards

Abstract Nudging has become a well-known policy practice. Recently, ‘boosting’ has been suggested as an alternative to nudging. In contrast to nudges, boosts aim to empower individuals to exert their own agency to make decisions. This article is one of the first to compare a nudging and a boosting intervention, and it does so in a critical field setting: hand hygiene compliance of hospital nurses. During a 4-week quasi-experiment, we tested the effect of a reframing nudge and a risk literacy boost on hand hygiene compliance in three hospital wards. The results show that nudging and boosting were both effective interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance. A tentative finding is that, while the nudge had a stronger immediate effect, the boost effect remained stable for a week, even after the removal of the intervention. We conclude that, besides nudging, researchers and policymakers may consider boosting when they seek to implement or test behavioral interventions in domains such as healthcare.

scholarly journals Access to Alcohol-Based Hand Rub Is Associated With Improved Hand Hygiene in an Ebola-Threatened District of Western Uganda

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s457-s457
Author(s):  
Mohammed Lamorde ◽  
Matthew Lozier ◽  
Maureen Kesande ◽  
Patricia Akers ◽  
Olive Tumuhairwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Wide Distribution ◽  
Patient Contact ◽  
Improve Hand Hygiene ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Handwashing With Soap

Background: Ebola virus disease (EVD) is highly transmissible and has a high mortality rate. During outbreaks, EVD can spread across international borders. Inadequate hand hygiene places healthcare workers (HCWs) at increased risk for healthcare-associated infections, including EVD. In high-income countries, alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) can improve hand hygiene compliance among HCWs in healthcare facilities (HCF). We evaluated local production and district-wide distribution of a WHO-recommended ABHR formulation and associations between ABHR availability in HCF and HCW hand hygiene compliance. Methods: The evaluation included 30 HCF in Kabarole District, located in Western Uganda near the border with the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where an EVD outbreak has been ongoing since August 2018. We recorded baseline hand hygiene practices before and after patient contact among 46 healthcare workers across 20 HCFs in August 2018. Subsequently, in late 2018, WHO/UNICEF distributed commercially produced ABHR to all 30 HCFs in Kabarole as part of Ebola preparedness efforts. In February 2019, our crossover evaluation distributed 20 L locally produced ABHR to each of 15 HCFs. From June 24–July 5, 2019, we performed follow-up observations of hand hygiene practices among 68 HCWs across all 30 HCFs. We defined hand hygiene as handwashing with soap or using ABHR. We conducted focus groups with healthcare workers at baseline and follow-up. Results: We observed hand hygiene compliance before and after 203 and 308 patient contacts at baseline and follow-up, respectively. From baseline to follow-up, hand hygiene compliance before patient contact increased for ABHR use (0% to 17%) and handwashing with soap (0% to 5%), for a total increase from 0% to 22% (P < .0001). Similarly, hand hygiene after patient contact increased from baseline to follow-up for ABHR use (from 3% to 55%), and handwashing with soap decreased (from 12% to 7%), yielding a net increase in hand hygiene compliance after patient contact from 15% to 62% (P < .0001). Focus groups found that HCWs prefer ABHR to handwashing because it is faster and more convenient. Conclusions: In an HCF in Kabarole District, the introduction of ABHR appeared to improve hand hygiene compliance. However, the confirmation of 3 EVD cases in Uganda 120 km from Kabarole District 2 weeks before our follow-up hand hygiene observations may have influenced healthcare worker behavior and hand hygiene compliance. Local production and district-wide distribution of ABHR is feasible and may contribute to improved hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers.Funding: NoneDisclosures: Mohammed Lamorde, Contracted Research - Janssen Pharmaceutica, ViiV, Mylan

scholarly journals Interventions to improve healthcare workers’ hand hygiene compliance: A systematic review of systematic reviews

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1449-1456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley Price ◽  
Jennifer MacDonald ◽  
Lucyna Gozdzielewska ◽  
Tracey Howe ◽  
Paul Flowers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Monitoring Technology ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

AbstractObjectiveTo synthesize the existing evidence base of systematic reviews of interventions to improve healthcare worker (HCW) hand hygiene compliance (HHC).MethodsPRISMA guidelines were followed, and 10 information sources were searched in September 2017, with no limits to language or date of publication, and papers were screened against inclusion criteria for relevance. Data were extracted and risk of bias was assessed.ResultsOverall, 19 systematic reviews (n=20 articles) were included. Only 1 article had a low risk of bias. Moreover, 15 systematic reviews showed positive effects of interventions on HCW HHC, whereas 3 reviews evaluating monitoring technology did not. Findings regarding whether multimodal rather than single interventions are preferable were inconclusive. Targeting social influence, attitude, self-efficacy, and intention were associated with greater effectiveness. No clear link emerged between how educational interventions were delivered and effectiveness.ConclusionsThis is the first systematic review of systematic reviews of interventions to improve HCW HHC. The evidence is sufficient to recommend the implementation of interventions to improve HCW HHC (except for monitoring technology), but it is insufficient to make specific recommendations regarding the content or how the content should be delivered. Future research should rigorously apply behavior change theory, and recommendations should be clearly described with respect to intervention content and how it is delivered. Such recommendations should be tested for longer terms using stronger study designs with clearly defined outcomes.

scholarly journals Description of Hand Hygiene’s Compliance on Nurse of Hemodialysis at Haji Hospital Surabaya

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 240
Author(s):  
Rr Rizqi Saphira Nurani ◽  
Atik Choirul Hidajah
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
General Hospital ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Data Retrieval ◽  
Improve Hand Hygiene ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Hemodialysis Unit ◽  
Audit Form ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

Thousands patients around the world die every day because of infections when they get treatment. This is because the transmission of microbacteria from the hands of health workers. Hand hygiene is the most important aspect to prevent the transmission of microbacteria and preventing HAIs. Hand hygiene awareness of health workers is a fundamental behavior to prevent cross-infection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hand hygiene compliance of nurse in Unit Hemodialysis of Hajj General Hospital Surabaya. Type of this research is descriptive research and observations by using a qualitative approach. Data retrieval on the research is an interview with nurse and audit hand hygiene. Research instrument using a questionnaire of hand hygiene and BSI knowledge, and hand hygiene audit form made by WHO. The population in this research was all nurses in Hemodialysis Unit General Hospital Surabaya Hajj that add up to 11 people. The results of this research obtained that compliance with hand hygiene Unit Hemodialysis nurse is 35%. The compliance were still less and has not reached the standards established by the PPI Hajj General Hospital Surabaya that is 100% and still has not reach compliance standards of WHO that is 40%. Hand hygiene compliance was low caused by the low participation of PPI base training and the lack of availability of hand hygiene facility in the Hemodialysis Unit General Hospital Surabaya Hajj. Advice from research were conducting on job training about how to perform hand hygiene and improve hand hygiene facilities in Hemodialysis Units. Keywords: hand hygiene, compliance, nurse

scholarly journals 1189. Effectiveness of Multimodal Intervention Strategies to Improve Hand Hygiene Compliance at an Academic Medical Center

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S426-S427
Author(s):  
Bhagyashri D Navalkele ◽  
Myrtle Tate ◽  
Jeff Dunaway ◽  
Sheila Fletcher ◽  
Barbara Inman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Intervention Strategies ◽  
Improve Hand Hygiene ◽  
Early 19Th Century ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Multimodal Intervention ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

Abstract Background Since the early 19th century, hand hygiene (HH) has been recognized as the most important factor in preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAI). Still, improving HH compliance is a major hurdle for most healthcare facilities. Our study objective was to evaluate effectiveness of bundled intervention tools in increasing hand hygiene (HH) compliance. Methods The study was performed at the University of Mississippi Medical Center located in Jackson, MS. A multidisciplinary HH team was established in January 2016. Team members included infection prevention, nurse managers, physician, resident, housekeeping, process engineers, and ancillary staff. Hand hygiene compliance was determined based on room entry and exit observations. Intervention strategies were based on Joint Commission Center’s Targeted Solutions Tool (TST) to identify barriers in HH compliance, standardization of data collection, covert observer training and Just-in-time training of providers. Other strategies implemented included education and feedback, rewards and recognition, and system change measures during the 3-year study period (timeline in Table 1). Hand hygiene compliance was calculated based on number of compliance opportunities/total number of observations. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to analyze HH data. We did not assess the concomitant reduction in HAI rates as simultaneous HAI prevention strategies confounded analysis. Results Based on total 95,491 observations performed (January 2016- December 2018), there was a statistically significant improvement in HH compliance during the study period from 66.5% in 2016 to 73% in 2017 and 79.5% in 2018 (P = 0.04). Conclusion At our institution, we observed a 56% improvement in hand hygiene compliance over 36-months timeframe. Multidisciplinary team involvement and multimodal intervention strategies play crucial role in improvement and sustainment of HH compliance. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document