scholarly journals Using the Robson 10‐Group Classification System to Compare Cesarean Birth Utilization Between US Centers With and Without Midwives

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise Colter Smith ◽  
Julia C. Phillippi ◽  
Nancy K Lowe ◽  
Rachel Blankstein Breman ◽  
Nicole S. Carlson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Cesarean Birth

scholarly journals Robsons Ten Group Classification of Cesarean Section at a Tertiary Center in Nepal

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-96
Author(s):  
Gehanath Baral ◽  
Alish Shrestha ◽  
Arati Sah ◽  
Aswani Kumar Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Quality Of Data ◽  
Cesarean Birth ◽  
Robson Classification ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Preterm Group ◽  
Obstetric Population

Background: Increasing trend in Ceasarean birth is the issue of both demand and supply side. One of the recommended tools to characterize every pregnancy admitted for childbirth is Robson ten-group classification system that may evaluate obstetric practice. The aim of the study was to assess the cesarean section pattern based on Robson’s classification in a central referral hospital.Methods: A retrospective census of childbirths at Paropakar Maternity and Women’s Hospital in Kathmandu performed from September 2018 to February 2019 based on obstetric record. Robson ten-group classification system was the research tool to collect data and Robson Classification Report Table was used to evaluate the data.Results: There were 10500 births with 34% (32-35%) overall cesarean section rate. Excluding spontaneous and induced labor the supposedly total prelabor CS is 14.5%. Group 1+2+3 size is 81% and 21% CS; 5+10 had 11.3% and 23.3% respectively. Prelabor CS (2b+4b) is 3.54% and additional 11% from malpresentation and preterm. Group CS rate from Class 5 onwards, and ratio of 1 and 2 are as recommended by Robson; 67% of CS were not picked up by Robson class due to indications evolved as the labor progresses and the attributes not pre-classified.Conclusions: The assessed quality of data and the type of obstetric population by Robson reference values prove this study as a representative research. But the indications of cesarean sections can be predicted for only one-third of pregnancy attributes classified by Robson class. To supplement this tool to reduce rising cesarean birth requires audit of indications at decision making level.Keywords: Cesarean section; indication; prediction; robson classification

scholarly journals Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashida Parveen ◽  
Mehnaz Khakwani ◽  
Anum Naz ◽  
Rabia Bhatti
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Cesarean Sections ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Group 10 ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Previous Cesarean

Objective: To analyze trends of CSs and evaluating them according to Robson’s Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) at a leading government tertiary care hospital of South Punjab, Pakistan. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nishtar Medical University Hospital, Multan Pakistan, from October 2019 to March 2020.The study population included a total of 167 women who underwent CS in the hospital during the specified study period. For each case, we collected data regarding maternal characteristics and pregnancy-related information. The dependent variable was Robson classification group. Results: Overall, mean age was 26.53+5.1 years. Majority of the women, 116 (69.5%) belonged to urban areas of residence, 74 (44.3%) gestational aged between 37-42 years while 108 (64.7%) had history of cesarean section. Most of the patients, 85 (50.9%) turned out to be from TGCS Group-10. Group-5 and Group-1 were the 2nd and 3rd most common group, accounted for 24 (14.4%) and 19 (11.4%) cases respectively. Previous cesarean section (20.4%) and fetal distress (19.8%) were found to be most common indications leading to cesarean section. Conclusion: As per Robson’s Ten-Group Classification, Group-10 and Group-5 were found to be the most contributing among deliveries done. Previous cesarean section and fetal distress were the most common indications of cesarean section. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823 How to cite this:Parveen R, Khakwani M, Naz A, Bhatti R. Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(2):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Kaiserschnittraten im europäischen Vergleich

Die Hebamme ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (06) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Group Classification

Die Sectioraten in den einzelnen europäischen Ländern variieren erheblich. Eine Möglichkeit, die Perinatalmedizin regional und national zu monitorisieren und vergleichbar zu machen, bietet das von der WHO propagierte Ten-Group Classification System (TGCS) nach Robson. Wie gut dies anhand der verfügbaren nationalen Daten gelingt, untersuchte nun ein europäisches Forscherteam.

Use of the Robson Ten Group Classification System to categorise operative vaginal delivery

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 858-864
Author(s):  
Bobby D. O’Leary ◽  
Daniel T. Kane ◽  
Nicholas Kruseman Aretz ◽  
Michael P. Geary ◽  
Fergal D. Malone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Operative Vaginal Delivery

scholarly journals Analysis of caesarean section rate in tertiary care hospital according to Robson`s 10 groups classification

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1380
Author(s):  
Varija T. ◽  
Veerendra Kumar C. M. ◽  
Chandrasekhar Tarihalli
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Case Series Study ◽  
Group 5

Background: The caesarean section (CS) delivery rate is steadily increasing worldwide, including India. Identifying the proportion of women in various categories as per Robson's ten group classification system and CS rate among them is important to bring down the increasing CS rate.Methods: This case series study was conducted at Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences (VIMS), a tertiary care teaching hospital in Ballari, Karnataka, India. All pregnant women who have been admitted for delivery were enrolled and the data was collected for the women delivered by CS during January 2016 to December 2016 and proportions in various groups as per Robson’s ten-group classification system were calculated.Results: Among a total of 6980 women delivered during study period, 2992 (42.8%) delivered by CS. The CS rates among various groups varied from 100% among women with abnormal lies and group 6-95% (all nulliparous breeches) group 5-94% (Previous CS, single cephalic, >37 weeks) to 10 to 15% among multiparous women with spontaneous labour having single cephalic pregnancy (group 3). Among women with previous section, CS rate was very high (89.6%). Women with previous CS (group 5) contributed maximum (40.24%) to the total number of CS.Conclusions: In the present study, all women with breech presentation and abnormal lies delivered by CS and repeat CS was the highest contributor to all CS deliveries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document