Recent developments and the future of low-Tcalorimetric investigations in the Earth sciences: Consequences for thermodynamic calculations and databases

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Geiger ◽  
Edgar Dachs
1997 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 503-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy R. Carr ◽  
Rex C. Buchanan ◽  
Dana Adkins-Heljeson ◽  
Thomas D. Mettille ◽  
Janice Sorensen

Episodes ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Helena Henriques ◽  
Ana Isabel A. S. S. Andrade ◽  
Fernando Carlos Lopes
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (S325) ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
Ashish A. Mahabal ◽  
Daniel Crichton ◽  
S. G. Djorgovski ◽  
Emily Law ◽  
John S. Hughes

AbstractWe describe here the parallels in astronomy and earth science datasets, their analyses, and the opportunities for methodology transfer from astroinformatics to geoinformatics. Using example of hydrology, we emphasize how meta-data and ontologies are crucial in such an undertaking. Using the infrastructure being designed for EarthCube - the Virtual Observatory for the earth sciences - we discuss essential steps for better transfer of tools and techniques in the future e.g. domain adaptation. Finally we point out that it is never a one-way process and there is enough for astroinformatics to learn from geoinformatics as well.


2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-262
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Therezo
Keyword(s):  

This paper attempts to rethink difference and divisibility as conditions of (im)possibility for love and survival in the wake of Derrida's newly discovered—and just recently published—Geschlecht III. I argue that Derrida's deconstruction of what he calls ‘the grand logic of philosophy’ allows us to think love and survival without positing unicity as a sine qua non. This hypothesis is tested in and through a deconstructive reading of Heidegger's second essay on Trakl in On the Way to Language, where Heidegger's phonocentrism and surreptitious nationalism converge in an effort to ‘save the earth’ from a ‘degenerate’ Geschlecht that cannot survive the internal diremption between Geschlechter. I show that one way of problematizing Heidegger's claim is to point to the blank spaces in the ‘E i n’ of Trakl's ‘E i n Geschlecht’, an internal fissuring in the very word Heidegger mobilizes in order to secure the future of mankind.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document