Maternal and family characteristics associated with the Healthy Eating Index among low socioeconomic status Brazilian children

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Rauber ◽  
M. L. da Costa Louzada ◽  
C. A. Feldens ◽  
M. R. Vitolo
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Healthy Eating ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Healthy Eating Index ◽  
Family Characteristics ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Brazilian Children

scholarly journals Individualized Tailor-Made Dietetic Intervention Program at Schools Enhances Eating Behaviors and Dietary Habits in Obese Hispanic Children of Low Socioeconomic Status

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leticia Elizondo-Montemayor ◽  
Diana Moreno-Sànchez ◽  
Norma G. Gutierrez ◽  
Fabiola Monsivais-Rodriguez ◽  
Ubaldo Martinez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Healthy Eating ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Eating Habits ◽  
Hispanic Children ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Healthy Eating Habits ◽  
Dietetic Intervention

Hispanic children and those from low-socioeconomic status are predisposed to unhealthy eating habits and obesity.Aim. to implement an individualized, face-to-face, parent supported, and school-partnership dietetic intervention to promote healthy eating habits and decrease body mass index. Prospective school year dietetic intervention of 101 obese, Hispanic, low-socioeconomic school-age children representative of Monterrey, Mexico, consisted of anthropometrics, dietetic assessment, energy-restriction tailor-made daily menus, and parental education every three weeks. Student’st-test was used for means comparison. A significant decrease was found in body mass index percentile(96.43±3.32to93.42±8.12/P=0.00)and energy intake/day of −755.7 kcal/day(P=0.00). Among other energy dense foods with significant decline in servings/day and servings/week were processed meats(3.13 ± 1.43to2.19 ± 1.04/P=0.00and5.60 ± 1.75to4.37 ± 2.10/P=0.00, resp.), saturated fat(1.47 ± 1.08to0.78 ± 0.79/P=0.00and2.19±2.18to1.1±1.36/P=0.00), sweetened beverages(2.79±1.99to1.42±1.21and6.21±1.72to3.89±2.80/P=0.00), and desserts and refined-grain bakery(1.99±1.54to1.32±1.59and2.85 ± 2.54to1.57 ± 2.20/P=0.00). There was a significant increase in servings/day and servings/week of water(2.98 ± 2.02to4.91 ± 2.37and6.62 ± 2.03to6.87 ± 0.91/P=0.00, resp.) and nutrient dense foods such as fruits(1.31 ± 0.89to1.66 ± 0.96and3.34 ± 2.24to4.28 ± 2.43/P=0.00)and fish and poultry(3.76 ± 2.15to4.54 ± 2.25/P=0.00). This intervention created healthy eating habits and decreased body mass index in a high risk population. Trial registration number:NCT01925976.

Context Shapes Human Development

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Çiğdem Kağıtçıbaşı ◽  
Zeynep Cemalcılar
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Social Class ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Change Theory ◽  
Family Characteristics ◽  
Family Change ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Context Shapes ◽  
The Impact

This chapter aims to provide a comprehensive perspective on human behavior by studying the role of the distal environment on developmental processes. Social class, or more specifically socioeconomic status, is an all-encompassing context that has great significance in engulfing human phenomena. This chapter first reviews extant psychological literature on the deleterious effects of low social class on development and presents three studies as cases in point, demonstrating the significant impact of the context and contextual change on behavior. Kağıtçıbaşı’s theory of family change proposes three models of family: family of interdependence, family of independence, and family of emotional interdependence. Parenting, however, directly reflects family characteristics. Thus family change theory has led to a theory of the autonomous-related self. The chapter also presents research illustrating the impact of the objective environment and in particular the detrimental effects of low socioeconomic status on various developmental, social, and academic outcomes of Turkish samples.

A Study of Low Socioeconomic Status, Black Teenage Fathers and Their Nonfather Peers

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 648-656
Author(s):  
Frederick P. Rivara ◽  
Patrick J. Sweeney ◽  
Brady F. Henderson
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Teenage Pregnancy ◽  
Family Characteristics ◽  
Negative Attitudes ◽  
Poor Knowledge ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Teenage Parents ◽  
To Come ◽  
Teenage Fathers

Demographic background, attitude and knowledge about pregnancy and contraception, and family characteristics and dynamics of 100 teenage fathers were studied and compared with those of 100 nonfather, age-matched peers. The subjects' age ranged from 14 to 19 years with a mean age of 17.5 years. Nearly all subjects were black and were from families of low socioeconomic status. There were no differences between the two groups for age at first sexual intercourse (mean 12.5 years) and frequency of intercourse in the last year. More control subjects than fathers perceived pregnancy as disruptive of their future plans for school, job, and marriage. Teenage fathers were more likely to have mothers who were teenage parents (77% v 53%, P = .0007). In both groups, one third of their brothers and 44% of their sisters were teenage parents. Both groups had poor knowledge about the risk of pregnancy and the effectiveness of contraceptives. In both groups, negative attitudes about contraceptives represent barriers to their use. Both groups of subjects became sexually active at young ages, had poor knowledge about pregnancy prevention, and often had unprotected intercourse. Although there were many similarities between the two groups, the teenage fathers, in particular, seemed to come from an environment in which teenage pregnancy was common, accepted, and perceived to be minimally disruptive of their lives now or in the future.

Tomorrow never knows: Paradoxical effects of a future prime on performance among low socioeconomic status college students

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Dayle Herrmann ◽  
Jessica Bodford ◽  
Robert Adelman ◽  
Oliver Graudejus ◽  
Morris Okun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Paradoxical Effects
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document