scholarly journals Trends in COVID ‐19 Death Rates by Racial Composition of Nursing Homes

Author(s):  
Matlin Gilman ◽  
Mary T. Bassett
2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 13-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Garssen ◽  
C Harmsen ◽  
J De Beer

In the Netherlands, between 1400 and 2200 deaths in the summer of 2003 may have been heat-related. The fact that the maximum temperatures were lower than in some other European countries, and occurred in less heavily populated areas, may have led to mortality figures that were relatively less dramatic. The temporarily increased death rates are only partly due to a forward shift of mortality. Heat-related mortality was most pronounced among the elderly in nursing homes.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
John N Morris ◽  
Elizabeth Howard ◽  
Sabrina Egge ◽  
Erez Schachter ◽  
Fredrik Sjostrand

Abstract Background : Care planning has become more complex as nursing homes now are serving an ever more complex patient population. The primary purpose of this project is to identify, among persons admitted to and remaining up to 12 months, in a long-term care setting, those at more imminent risk of death, revealing the relevant risk factors and summarizing these factors within a Risk of Death Scale. Design : Longitudinal analysis of a national cohort of nursing home admissions from all United States facilities during years 2011 and 2012. Setting and Participants : Cohort included 1,536,842 admissions (764,002 for 2011, 772,840 for 2012). Repeated assessments are required every 90 days, with an additional assessment at discharge. Follow-up data over three years were examined. Methods : The Risk of Death Scale is based on two sub-scales. One included five very high risk of death measures. The second was composed of an additional eighteen risk factors. The dependent variable against which these models were developed was death by 365 days. Death rates are described from one-month post-admission to three years post-admission. Results : The Risk of Death Scale has twelve graded levels. The lowest four categories of the scale (0-3) represent approximately half the cohort and have one-year death rates that range from 3% to 15.5%, whereas the mean of the whole cohort is 24.2% at one year. The top four categories represent about 7% of the cohort and have one-year death rates ranging from 55.8% to 90.5%. The death rates increased steadily across the scale scores, a pattern that held through the three-year post admission period. Conclusions/Implications : The Risk of Death Scale for new admissions to nursing homes rests on a broad spectrum of 23 independent variables – including measures of prognosis, treatments, diagnoses, clinical status, function, cognitive status, and age. Almost 10% of the sample (n=149,073) had a risk score of 7 or greater and the average one-year mortality for this group was 68.6% (range of 47.5-90.5%).


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sana Jahedi ◽  
James A. Yorke

AbstractAs a pandemic of coronavirus spreads across the globe, people debate policies to mitigate its severity. Many complex, highly detailed models have been developed to help policy setters make better decisions. However, the basis of these models is unlikely to be understood by non-experts.We describe the advantages of simple models for covid-19. We say a model is “simple” if its only parameter is the rate of contact between people in the population. This contact rate can vary over time, depending on choices by policy setters. Such models can be understood by a broad audience, and thus can be helpful in explaining the policy decisions to the public. They can be used to evaluate outcomes of different policy strategies. However, simple models have a disadvantage when dealing with inhomogeneous populations.To augment the power of a simple model to evaluate complicated situations, we add what we call “satellite” equations that don’t change the original model. For example, with the help of a satellite equation, one could know what his/her chance is of remaining uninfected through the end of epidemic. Satellite equations can model the effect of the epidemic on high-risk individuals, or death rates, or on nursing homes, and other isolated populations.To compare simple models with complex models, we introduce our “slightly complex” Model J. We find the conclusions of simple and complex models can be quite similar. But, for each added complexity, a modeler may have to choose additional parameter values describing who will infect whom under what conditions, choices for which there is often little rationale but that can have a big impact on predictions. Our simulations suggest that the added complexity offers little predictive advantage.Author SummaryThere is a large variety of available data about the coronavirus pandemic, but we still lack data about some important factors. Who is likely to infect whom and under what conditions and how long after becoming infected? These factors are the essence of transmission dynamics. Two groups using identical complex models can be expected to make different predictions simply because they make different choices for such transmission parameters in the model. The audience has no way to choose between their predictions. We explain how simple models can be used to answer complex questions by adding what we call satellite equations, addressing questions involving age groups, death rates, and likelihood of transmission to nursing homes and to uninfected, isolated populations. Simple models are ideal for seeing what kinds of interventions are needed to achieve goals of policy setters.


Author(s):  
Charles Ellis ◽  
Molly Jacobs

Health disparities have once again moved to the forefront of America's consciousness with the recent significant observation of dramatically higher death rates among African Americans with COVID-19 when compared to White Americans. Health disparities have a long history in the United States, yet little consideration has been given to their impact on the clinical outcomes in the rehabilitative health professions such as speech-language pathology/audiology (SLP/A). Consequently, it is unclear how the absence of a careful examination of health disparities in fields like SLP/A impacts the clinical outcomes desired or achieved. The purpose of this tutorial is to examine the issue of health disparities in relationship to SLP/A. This tutorial includes operational definitions related to health disparities and a review of the social determinants of health that are the underlying cause of such disparities. The tutorial concludes with a discussion of potential directions for the study of health disparities in SLP/A to identify strategies to close the disparity gap in health-related outcomes that currently exists.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (15) ◽  
pp. 3-31
Author(s):  
Mark Kander
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (15) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Mary Ellen Schneider
Keyword(s):  

Pflege ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-63
Author(s):  
Hannes Mayerl ◽  
Tanja Trummer ◽  
Erwin Stolz ◽  
Éva Rásky ◽  
Wolfgang Freidl

Abstract. Background: Given that nursing staff play a critical role in the decision regarding use of physical restraints, research has examined nursing professionals’ attitudes toward this practice. Aim: Since nursing professionals’ views on physical restraint use have not yet been examined in Austria to date, we aimed to explore nursing professionals’ attitudes concerning use of physical restraints in nursing homes of Styria (Austria). Method: Data were collected from a convenience sample of nursing professionals (N = 355) within 19 Styrian nursing homes, based on a cross-sectional study design. Attitudes toward the practice of restraint use were assessed by means of the Maastricht Attitude Questionnaire in the German version. Results: The overall results showed rather positive attitudes toward the use of physical restraints, yet the findings regarding the sub-dimensions of the questionnaire were mixed. Although nursing professionals tended to deny “good reasons” for using physical restraints, they evaluated the consequences of physical restraint use rather positive and considered restraint use as an appropriate health care practice. Nursing professionals’ views regarding the consequences of using specific physical restraints further showed that belts were considered as the most restricting and discomforting devices. Conclusions: Overall, Austrian nursing professionals seemed to hold more positive attitudes toward the use of physical restraints than counterparts in other Western European countries. Future nationwide large-scale surveys will be needed to confirm our findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document