scholarly journals Improving Specialty Care of Older Adults: Creating Champions, Supporting Research, Fostering Partnerships

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. 2151-2152 ◽  
Author(s):  
George W. Drach
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1032-1038
Author(s):  
Grant R. Williams ◽  
Kathryn E. Weaver ◽  
Glenn J. Lesser ◽  
Emily Dressler ◽  
Karen M. Winkfield ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 1909-1915
Author(s):  
Emerson M. Wickwire ◽  
Sophia L. Jobe ◽  
Sairam Parthasarathy ◽  
Jacob Collen ◽  
Vincent F. Capaldi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 914-914
Author(s):  
Mina Silberberg ◽  
Anisha Singh ◽  
Janet Bettger ◽  
Rowena Dolor ◽  
Sherri Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract Over one-third of older adults have a disabling hearing loss, with potentially severe implications for well-being. Hearing screening is not routine in primary care (PC) and patients are relied upon to report hearing concerns. We compared outcomes of three approaches to linking telephone-based screening with PC (providing information at PC visit, encouraging at visit, or completing at visit). This poster presents results of focus groups/interviews with providers and staff from participating clinics (n= 35), study enrollees who completed screening and were referred for diagnosis (n=14 ), and enrollees who did not complete screening (n=12). Results show that most patients had prior hearing concerns they had not reported to their PC. Patients forgot or were resistant to completing screening at home. Negative attitudes towards admitting hearing loss and using hearing aids were common; experiences of family and friends influenced many patient attitudes, both negative and positive. PC personnel wish to help, but are challenged by lack of time, space, and reimbursement for screening, and loathe to screen when specialty care and hearing aids are costly. Study results indicate that relying on patients to report hearing concerns is inadequate. Integration of hearing screening into PC would be helped by strengthening reimbursement for screening, specialty care, and hearing aids, and education of both providers and patients on other available treatments for hearing loss. Patients also require education on hearing aid technology. There is a need to address stigma associated with hearing loss, taking into consideration the influence of family and friends on attitudes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen M. Kelley ◽  
Larry L. Jacoby

Abstract Cognitive control constrains retrieval processing and so restricts what comes to mind as input to the attribution system. We review evidence that older adults, patients with Alzheimer's disease, and people with traumatic brain injury exert less cognitive control during retrieval, and so are susceptible to memory misattributions in the form of dramatic levels of false remembering.


2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1258-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan K. MacPherson

PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine the impact of cognitive load imposed by a speech production task on the speech motor performance of healthy older and younger adults. Response inhibition, selective attention, and working memory were the primary cognitive processes of interest.MethodTwelve healthy older and 12 healthy younger adults produced multiple repetitions of 4 sentences containing an embedded Stroop task in 2 cognitive load conditions: congruent and incongruent. The incongruent condition, which required participants to suppress orthographic information to say the font colors in which color words were written, represented an increase in cognitive load relative to the congruent condition in which word text and font color matched. Kinematic measures of articulatory coordination variability and movement duration as well as a behavioral measure of sentence production accuracy were compared between groups and conditions and across 3 sentence segments (pre-, during-, and post-Stroop).ResultsIncreased cognitive load in the incongruent condition was associated with increased articulatory coordination variability and movement duration, compared to the congruent Stroop condition, for both age groups. Overall, the effect of increased cognitive load was greater for older adults than younger adults and was greatest in the portion of the sentence in which cognitive load was manipulated (during-Stroop), followed by the pre-Stroop segment. Sentence production accuracy was reduced for older adults in the incongruent condition.ConclusionsIncreased cognitive load involving response inhibition, selective attention, and working memory processes within a speech production task disrupted both the stability and timing with which speech was produced by both age groups. Older adults' speech motor performance may have been more affected due to age-related changes in cognitive and motoric functions that result in altered motor cognition.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-403
Author(s):  
Dania Rishiq ◽  
Ashley Harkrider ◽  
Cary Springer ◽  
Mark Hedrick

Purpose The main purpose of this study was to evaluate aging effects on the predominantly subcortical (brainstem) encoding of the second-formant frequency transition, an essential acoustic cue for perceiving place of articulation. Method Synthetic consonant–vowel syllables varying in second-formant onset frequency (i.e., /ba/, /da/, and /ga/ stimuli) were used to elicit speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses (speech-ABRs) in 16 young adults ( M age = 21 years) and 11 older adults ( M age = 59 years). Repeated-measures mixed-model analyses of variance were performed on the latencies and amplitudes of the speech-ABR peaks. Fixed factors were phoneme (repeated measures on three levels: /b/ vs. /d/ vs. /g/) and age (two levels: young vs. older). Results Speech-ABR differences were observed between the two groups (young vs. older adults). Specifically, older listeners showed generalized amplitude reductions for onset and major peaks. Significant Phoneme × Group interactions were not observed. Conclusions Results showed aging effects in speech-ABR amplitudes that may reflect diminished subcortical encoding of consonants in older listeners. These aging effects were not phoneme dependent as observed using the statistical methods of this study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document