Aspects of Vietnamese Sutchi Catfish (Pangasius Hypophthalmus ) Frozen Fillet Quality: Microbiological Profile and Chemical Residues.

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 532-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Dambrosio ◽  
Giovanni Normanno ◽  
Arianna Storelli ◽  
Grazia Barone ◽  
Federica Ioanna ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Huezo ◽  
J.K. Northcutt ◽  
D.P. Smith ◽  
D.L. Fletcher

Proceedings ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Loulouda Bosnea ◽  
Antonia Terpou ◽  
Eleni Pappa ◽  
Efthymia Kondyli ◽  
Marios Mataragas ◽  
...  

Spirulina platensis, the most popular microalgae species known for its high protein content and bioactive compounds such as phycocyanin and allophycocyanin, has been studied for cheese fortification. Incorporation of spirulina in dairy products poses major sensorial challenges due to its characteristic odor and its insolubility in food formulation, thus limiting consumer acceptance. The main objective was the production of a novel spread cheese fortified with spirulina, so powdered spirulina was added at different concentrations (0.25, 0.5, and 1%), and the effect on physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory characteristics was assessed. Cheese samples were examined for pH, fat (Gerber-Van Gulik method), salt (Volhard method), protein (Kjeldahl), and moisture content by drying to constant weight at 102 ± 1 °C. Cheeses were also assessed organoleptically by five experienced panelists. Generally, the addition of spirulina slightly increased the protein content and affected the color of the cheeses. The cheeses achieved a good microbiological profile and were all characterized as acceptable for consumption by the panelists. However, the cheeses with 0.25 and 0.5% spirulina were mostly preferred by the evaluation panel due to the less intense characteristic odor and taste of spirulina. We conclude that it is possible to produce an acceptable spread cheese with the addition of spirulina without significant changes in the cheese production line.


Author(s):  
S.J. Park ◽  
J.W. Park ◽  
G.A. Ahn ◽  
S.Y. Choi ◽  
K.H. Yoo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 21-21
Author(s):  
David J Smith

Abstract Most commodity crops undergo milling, husking, ginning or other processing procedures before use as human food or fiber. Byproduct nutrient density varies with the type of grain or oil seed processed and use typically varies with nutrient needs of specific production situations. Drought or high grain prices may increase the use of byproducts; regionally available, low-cost ingredients such as cotton ginning byproduct may be used extensively by beef producers to replace forage. Doubt associated with the use of such byproducts is not typically related to nutritional value but with uncertainties about the presence of residual pesticides, herbicides, or harvest-aid chemicals. Potential chemical residues in consumer products and the concomitant financial and reputational losses borne by the industry provide an impetus for concern. Negative experiences with contaminated Australian beef established a long-lived suspicion of “cotton trash” that continues to impact the industry today. The purpose of this review is to discuss sources, amounts, and risks of chemical residues associated with byproduct feeds used in the southern United States with cotton ginning byproducts as a major focus. The use patterns of specific crop protection and harvest-aid chemicals will be discussed in context with chemical tolerances established by the U.S. EPA. In addition, U.S. pesticide monitoring programs in beef will be discussed. Although data describing the transmission of chemical residues from byproduct feeds into beef products are limited, the available data suggest some best practices could be adopted to mitigate concerns and minimize possible agrochemical residue contamination of beef.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document