Ethics ward rounds: a conduit to finding meaning and value in medical school

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1084-1084
Author(s):  
Lisa Parker ◽  
Lisa Watts
2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Harris ◽  
G Khera ◽  
A r Alanbuki ◽  
K Ray ◽  
W Yusuf ◽  
...  

Abstract Background On the 23rd March 2020 the government issued a nationwide lockdown in response to COVID-19. Using Microsoft Teams software, Brighton and Sussex Medical School transitioned to remote surgical teaching. We discuss the early feedback from students and tutors. Method All students (N = 40) and tutors (N = 7) were invited to complete an online feedback survey. Results Twenty students responded. Nine preferred remote teaching. The teaching was described as either good (10/20) or excellent (10/20). Small group teaching, lectures and student lead seminar sessions all received positive feedback. Students preferred sessions that were interactive. One hour was optimal (17/20). There was no consensus over class size. 15/20 (75%) would like remote teaching to continue after the pandemic. All tutors responded. There was a preference towards shorter sessions: 45 minutes (2/7) one hour (5/7). Tutors found virtual sessions less interactive (6/7). All tutors would like remote teaching to continue after the pandemic. Three suggested extending teaching to remote surgical ward rounds. Concern was raised by both students and tutors regarding the absence of practical skills. Conclusions The value of remote teaching has been highlighted by COVID-19. Our feedback recommends a transition towards blended learning; using the convenience of remote teaching to help augment traditional medical school teaching.


2010 ◽  
Vol 182 (7) ◽  
pp. E300-E300
Author(s):  
D. Sum

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
S J K Chong ◽  
L Mortimer ◽  
C Quick ◽  
L West ◽  
G Khera

Abstract Aim A UK teaching hospital expanded their established education fellow programme to the General Surgery department to assist with departmental teaching of third-year medical students from the affiliated medical school on clinical placement. Teaching on ward rounds, bedside teaching and clinical tutorials were three areas identified as requiring improvement based on previous student feedback. Observation of Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy multi-disciplinary meetings (MDMs) via Microsoft Teams was also introduced as a new teaching initiative. Method Four post-foundation training education fellows were allocated on alternating weeks to supervise third-year medical students on upper and lower GI ward rounds and during GI MDM observation, conduct bedside teaching and facilitate blended-learning clinical tutorials in accordance with the 2020 GMC Medical Licensing Assessment curriculum. A mixed-methods survey was sent to students after surgical placement and the results compared to student feedback from previous years. Results 31 out of 52 students (60%) on placement responded. 100% rated the fellow-led clinical tutorials as “excellent”. 87% of respondents rated the upper and lower GI ward rounds as either “excellent” (52%) or “good” (35%). All respondents rated the implementation of education fellows as either “very helpful” (94%) or “helpful” (6%) for their learning. Most students rated the MDM observation initiative as “good” (36%) or “average” (36%). Conclusions Implementation of education fellows on third-year medical student placements in General Surgery facilitates self-reported student learning and is associated with a drastically improved student learning experience. More work is required to develop GI MDM-based teaching to improve student learning experiences from MDMs.


1966 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 522-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. R. Suskind

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document