Stabilizing Conditional Standard Errors of Measurement in Scale Score Transformations

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Moses ◽  
YoungKoung Kim
Keyword(s):  
Scale Score ◽  
Standard Errors ◽  
Standard Errors Of Measurement

Conditional Standard Errors of Measurement for Composite Scores on the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Third Edition

2006 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 237-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry R. Price ◽  
Anna Lurie ◽  
Nambury Raju ◽  
Charles Wilkins ◽  
Jianjun Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Standard Errors ◽  
Primary Scale ◽  
Composite Scores ◽  
Standard Errors Of Measurement

Standard Errors of Measurement for the Various MMPI Subscales

1985 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 444-446
Author(s):  
B. J. Bushman
Keyword(s):  
Standard Errors ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Individual Giving ◽  
Standard Errors Of Measurement

If an individual takes more than one MMPI the subscale scores are likely to vary. The individual giving the test may wish to identify significant changes between subscale scores. Standard errors of measurement may be beneficial in this regard. The purpose of this study was to compute the standard errors of measurement for each of the MMPI subscales. A table is also provided for individuals who wish to use these data.

Reliability of the WAIS-R with a Mixed Patient Sample

1982 ◽  
Vol 55 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1277-1278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Ryan ◽  
Aurelio Prifitera ◽  
Jacquelyn Larsen
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Setting ◽  
Digit Span ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Standard Errors ◽  
Digit Symbol ◽  
Reliability Estimate ◽  
Patient Sample ◽  
Reliable Instrument ◽  
Neurological Patients ◽  
Standard Errors Of Measurement

Reliability of the WAIS-R for a mixed sample of psychiatric and neurological patients was determined. Split-half reliabilities and standard errors of measurement were computed for all subtests (except Digit Span and Digit Symbol) and the Verbal, Performance, and Full Scale IQs. Only the Arithmetic subtest had a reliability estimate which was significantly lower than that of the 35—44-yr.-old standardization group. All other reliabilities and standard errors of measurement approximated those reported for the normative group. It was concluded that the WAIS-R is a reliable instrument for evaluating patients in a clinical setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document