The establishment of a Middle East Acne Advisory Board: a success story

Author(s):  
H.P.M. Gollnick
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dakhil Al-Enezi ◽  
Saleh Gholoum ◽  
Mishari Al-Hajeri ◽  
Jassem Mohammed ◽  
Reem Al-Enezi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dakhil Al-Enezi ◽  
Saleh Gholoum ◽  
Mishari Al-Hajeri ◽  
Jassem Mohammed ◽  
Reem Al-Enezi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Subaihi ◽  
A. Benanjaya ◽  
M. A. Al Bloushi ◽  
A. R. Gali ◽  
U. I. Hashmi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-32
Author(s):  
Khalid Hashim Mohammed

The Obama administration repeated that its promise to withdraw from Iraq on time was one of its most important achievements in the first presidential term. In fact, this withdrawal was within a broader and broader context that began to emerge in Obama's second term: withdrawal from the Middle East, In the so-called Asia "Rebalance", but the growing international chaos and the explosion of many crises in the face of the US administration such as the Syrian crisis and Iraq, especially after the so-called Arab Spring revolutions, cast a shadow over the region, and turning Iraq from the success story of the Obama administration and a benchmark for its achievements in foreign policy, a story Failure and a standard of confusion in foreign policy, and critics of the Obama administration, the American withdrawal "arbitrary" created a vacuum in Iraq filled by the opponents of the United States and lose control, or at least affect the course of the arena, both at the level of local players or regional.


mSphere ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Imperiale ◽  
Arturo Casadevall

ABSTRACT This year, the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) will be making recommendations to the U.S. Government regarding the ongoing saga of gain-of-function (GOF) experiments with highly infectious respiratory pathogens, such as influenza virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus, and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus.


2014 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 5-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
İlkim Özdikmenli ◽  
Şevket Ovalı

AbstractThis article argues that it is fallacious to promote the Turkish democratic experience under the Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP) as a model for the emerging Arab democracies. Despite the early political reformism of the AKP, an empirical analysis of the government’s recent crackdown on basic rights and freedoms demonstrates that the “Turkish model,” defined as a marriage of Islam and liberal democracy, cannot respond to the demands of Arab reformers. In this regard, the article falls into three sections. In the first section, assets of the “Turkish model” according to various actors are examined, which casts doubt on the emancipatory discourse underlying the promotion of the model. The second section proposes the term “leader democracy”—or, more specifically, “Erdoğanism”—as a way of denoting the governmental structure of Turkey as of early 2014. The final section depicts the current Turkish democracy in terms of the state of checks and balances and of basic political and social rights.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document