scholarly journals Glycemic control and adherence to basal insulin therapy in Taiwanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 881-888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming‐Nan Chien ◽  
Yen‐Ling Chen ◽  
Yi‐Jen Hung ◽  
Shu‐Yi Wang ◽  
Wen‐Tsung Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Insulin Therapy ◽  
Basal Insulin

scholarly journals When basal insulin is not enough: successful strategies for insulin intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 363-373
Author(s):  
Elena V. Buryukova ◽  
Abdul Jabbar ◽  
Svetlana V. Elizarova
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Insulin Therapy ◽  
Clinical Management ◽  
Basal Insulin ◽  
Insulin Intensification ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages

Maintaining glycemic control through intensive clinical management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is well recognized to reduce the risk of diabetes-associated complications. Patients in Russia have high rates of microvascular and macrovascular complications as a result of undiagnosed, untreated, or inadequately treated diabetes, emphasizing the need for better clinical management. The introduction of basal insulin therapy is often necessary for patients with T2DM when oral antihyperglycemic drugs and lifestyle management strategies are no longer effective inmaintaining glycemic targets. However, after initiation of insulin, patients often remain on basal insulin for long periods despite suboptimal glycemic control, and intensification of insulin therapy is frequently necessary. Here, we report on several different insulin intensification strategies available to clinicians and their patients to improve glycemic control and the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. These strategies include the use of short- and long-acting insulins administered either as bolus doses or as premixed insulins. When selecting the most appropriate intensification strategy, clinicians should consider the lifestyle and treatment goals of their patients to help ensure treatment success.

Optimization of insulin therapy in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: beyond basal insulin

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. e13-e20 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. T. Blak ◽  
H. T. Smith ◽  
M. Hards ◽  
B. H. Curtis ◽  
T. Ivanyi
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Insulin Therapy ◽  
Basal Insulin

Pramlintide as an Adjunct to Basal Insulin: Effects on Glycemic Control and Weight in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 166-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron W. Lush ◽  
Tamara Darsow ◽  
Bei Zhang ◽  
Gayle Lorenzi ◽  
Juan P. Frias
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Basal Insulin

scholarly journals Probiotics Contribute to Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanitsara Rittiphairoj ◽  
Krit Pongpirul ◽  
Kantima Janchot ◽  
Noel T Mueller ◽  
Tianjing Li
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Insulin Therapy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Short Term

ABSTRACT This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of probiotics for glycemic control in adults with impaired glucose control, including prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, and trial registries up to February 2019. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of participants with prediabetes or T2DM. Eligible trials compared probiotics versus either placebo, no intervention, or comparison probiotics, or compared synbiotics versus prebiotics. Primary outcomes were mean change in fasting blood glucose (FBG) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to short term (<12 wk) and long term (≥12 wk). We performed meta-analyses using the random-effects model. We included 28 RCTs (1947 participants). Overall, probiotics reduced FBG more than the placebo/no intervention group with a mean difference (MD) of –12.99 mg/dL (95% CI: –23.55, –2.42; P value: 0.016) over the short term; and –2.99 mg/dL (95% CI: –5.84, –0.13; P value: 0.040) over the long term. There was also some evidence for reduced HbA1c in the probiotics group at both short term (MD: –0.17; 95% CI: –0.37, 0.02; P value: 0.084) and long term (MD: –0.14; 95% CI: –0.34, 0.06; P value: 0.172), however, these did not reach statistical significance possibly because only a few trials reported HbA1c as an outcome. Subgroup analyses showed a greater reduction in HbA1c in participants not receiving insulin therapy than those receiving insulin therapy. Furthermore, the effect of probiotics on the reduction of FBG was more pronounced in participants with FBG >130 mg/dL and those not receiving insulin therapy than their counterparts. Probiotics were also effective in lowering serum cholesterol over the short and long term. In conclusion, we found that probiotics may have a glucose-lowering effect in T2DM participants. The effect appeared to be stronger in participants with poorly controlled diabetes and those not on insulin therapy. Systematic review registration: CRD42019121682.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document