Potentially inappropriate medications and anticholinergic and sedative burden in older patients with haemophilia or von Willebrand disease: The M’HEMORRH‐AGE study

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teddy Novais ◽  
Christelle Prudent ◽  
Amélie Cransac ◽  
Frederic Gervais ◽  
Christelle Mouchoux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Patients ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Inappropriate Medications

scholarly journals The application of updating PIM-Taiwan criteria in clinic-visiting older patients with polypharmacy

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 699-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chirn-Bin Chang ◽  
Hsiu-Yun Lai ◽  
Shinn-Jang Hwang ◽  
Shu-Yu Yang ◽  
Ru-Shu Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Medication Safety ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Safety Review ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Logistic Regressions ◽  
Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Country Specific

Background: PIM-Taiwan criteria were first established in 2010 for potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Currently, updating of PIM criteria is mandatory because of newly established evidence and newly developed medications. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of PIM based on country-specific PIM criteria and factors associated with PIM use by applying 2010 version and newly updating PIM-Taiwan criteria in a cohort with polypharmacy. Methods: The baseline data of Medication Safety Review Clinic Taiwan (MSRC–Taiwan) study were used to investigate the prevalence of PIMs. Older patients (aged ⩾65 years) who were either having polypharmacy or visited ⩾3 different physicians were enrolled between August and October 2007. Bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regressions were used to evaluate the factors associated with PIM use. Results: The prevalence of having at least one PIM was 46.1% for 2010 version and increased to 74.6% for 2018 version. The average number of PIMs generally to be avoided per patient also increased for 2018 version (0.2 versus 1.2, p < 0.0001). In contrast, the average number of PIMs considering chronic conditions per patient decreased (0.6 versus 0.3, p < 0.001). The associated chronic conditions of PIM users were distinct between 2010 and 2018 version. The major leading PIMs were benzodiazepines (BZDs) in both versions of criteria. Conclusions: As there were significant differences in medication lists between PIM-Taiwan version 2010 and 2018, the prevalence of PIM and factors associated with PIM users varied accordingly. Physicians should pay special attention before prescribing BZDs which keep being the major leading PIM.

scholarly journals Adherence to Beers Criteria in Geriatrics: A Retrospective Study in a Saudi Teaching Hospital

Geriatrics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Samah Alshehri ◽  
Mohannad Alshibani ◽  
Ghaydaa Magboul ◽  
Albandari Albandar ◽  
Roaa Nasser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Beers Criteria ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Inappropriate Medications

Background: The aging process makes geriatric populations more prone to various chronic diseases. Such diseases require older patients to be on more medications than any other age group and make them more susceptible to adverse drug events related to potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Aim: To identify the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications among older people and explore the most commonly prescribed PIMs in hospitalized patients. Design and Setting: A retrospective study conducted in a large tertiary hospital among patients hospitalized in a 4 year period from January 2015 to December 2018. Methods: The 2019 Beers Criteria were used to assess PIMs in all inpatient prescribed medications focusing on the first class (i.e., drug/drug class to be avoided in older adults). Results: The mean age was 75.17 ± 7.66 years. A total of 684 (80.6%) patients were prescribed at least one medication listed in the first-class category of the 2019 Beers Criteria. Top five drugs were proton pump inhibitors (40.3%), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (10.2%), metoclopramide (9.3%), benzodiazepines (8.4%), and insulin (5.4%). Conclusions: The prevalence of PIMs is high among older patients admitted to the hospital. More efforts are needed to investigate the potential reasons and develop action plans to improve concordance to Beers Criteria among healthcare providers.

scholarly journals Influence of Education Level of Older Patients on Polypharmacy, Potentially Inappropriate Medications Listed in Beer’s Criteria, and Unplanned Hospitalization: A Cross-Sectional Study in Lahore, Pakistan

Medicina ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sarwar ◽  
Sadia Iftikhar ◽  
Muhammad Sarfraz
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Education Level ◽  
P Value ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Inappropriate Medications

Objective: To evaluate influence of education level of older patients on polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) listed in Beer’s Criteria, and unplanned hospitalization. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among older people aged ≥65 years between 1 December 2017 and 28 February 2018. For data analysis, descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were employed. Results: Among 385 older patients, 88.8% were prescribed PIMs and 56.4% underwent PIMs associated unplanned hospitalization. Older people were less exposed to polypharmacy or excessive polypharmacy as their education levels increased (no formal education vs. primary vs. secondary vs. tertiary, 74% vs. 69.8% vs. 60.5% vs. 58.1%). Patients having higher education were also accompanied by significantly lower prescription of PIMs (no formal education vs. primary vs. secondary vs. tertiary, 96% vs. 87.3% vs. 84.5% vs. 79.1%) as well as unplanned hospitalization (no formal education vs. primary vs. secondary vs. tertiary, 64.7% vs. 76.2% vs. 40.3% vs. 46.5%). Results of regression analysis revealed that no formal education (OR = 1.202, 95% CI = 1.032–2.146, p-value = 0.003) and primary education level (OR = 1.175, 95% CI = 1.014–1.538, p-value = 0.039) were significantly associated with the use of polypharmacy among older people. On the other hand, no formal education was significantly associated with the prescription of PIMs (OR = 1.898, 95% CI = 1.151–2.786, p-value = 0.007). Furthermore, older people with no formal education (OR = 1.402, 95% CI = 1.123–1.994, p-value = 0.010) and primary education level (OR = 1.775, 95% CI = 1.281–3.018, p-value = <0.001) were significantly more likely to undergo unplanned hospitalization. Conclusions: Patients having low literacy level are more likely to receive PIMs, polypharmacy, and undergo unplanned hospitalization in comparison to highly educated patients. Hence, promotion of health literacy for patients is crucial to overcome these problems.

scholarly journals Why deprescribing instead of not prescribing?

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 294-297
Author(s):  
Welma Wildes Amorim ◽  
Luiz Carlos Passos ◽  
Marcio Galvão Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Older People ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Patient Harm ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Appropriate Prescription

Prescribing medications involves complex cognitive processes, and mistakes in prescription can cause serious adverse events. Deprescribing is one of the last opportunities to prevent patient harm from the use of drugs that should be avoided, especially among older patients. This viewpoint article aims to discuss the prescription process and some essential concepts, such as polypharmacy, prescription of potentially inappropriate medications, and, particularly, the relevance of deprescribing and its relationship with the appropriate prescription of medications in older people.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document