scholarly journals PR674: Comparison of 5-year outcomes of implant therapy using bone level or tissue level implants in a specialty practice

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 352-352
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Level ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Implant Therapy ◽  
Specialty Practice

scholarly journals Peri-implant bone-level changes in the second decade of loading with regard to the implant–abutment connection: a retrospective study on implants under systematic aftercare

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Brigitte Kruse ◽  
Vanessa Wild ◽  
Petra Ratka-Krüger ◽  
Kirstin Vach ◽  
Eberhard Frisch
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Private Practice ◽  
Tissue Level ◽  
Butt Joint ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Implant Abutment ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Implant Therapy ◽  
Connection Type

Abstract Background This retrospective study investigates the change in the peri-implant bone level (PBL) during the 2nd decade of intraoral function in patients complying with a ‘supportive implant therapy’ (SIT) program. The results were statistically analyzed with respect to the implant abutment connection used. Methods In a private practice, only patients with 20-year SIT compliance were identified. Of these, all patients with 10- and 20-year radiographs available were selected. Therefore, no control group was possible and implant losses had to be excluded. Two experienced researchers assessed the peri-implant bone levels. As three different abutment connection concepts (bone-level butt-joint, bone-level conical and tissue-level conical) and two different implant surfaces (machined vs. roughened) were involved, statistical analyses were performed to detect potential differences. Results Ninety-three implants from 36 patients with 20-year SIT compliance and available radiographs were included in the study. At study baseline (10 years intraoral), a mean bone loss of − 1.7 mm (median − 1.2; standard deviation [sd] 1.4, range: 0 to − 7.2) was recorded. After 20 years, we found a mean bone loss of − 2.5 mm (median − 2.3, sd 1.79, range: − 0.5 to + 7.4). Furthermore, we found a mean bone loss of 0.8 mm in intraoral function from year 10 to year 20 (mean: 0.08 mm per year); this change was independent of the abutment connection type. Conclusions During the 2nd decade of function, peri-implant bone loss in patients with SIT compliance might be small in value and should not be expected in all implants.

scholarly journals Peri-Implant Behavior of Tissue Level Dental Implants with a Convergent Neck

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 5232
Author(s):  
Rubén Agustín-Panadero ◽  
Irene Bermúdez-Mulet ◽  
Lucía Fernández-Estevan ◽  
María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz ◽  
Rocío Marco-Pitarch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Tissue Level ◽  
Functional Load ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Group I ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Single Crowns ◽  
Functional Loading

Introduction: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the radiographic peri-implant bone loss of bone level implants and tissue level implants with a convergent neck in screw-retained single crowns and in screw-retained fixed partial prostheses, after two years of functional loading. Materials and methods: The sample was divided into two groups according to their type: Group I: supracrestal implants with convergent transmucosal neck; Group II: crestal implants. In each group we distinguish two subgroups according to the type of prosthetic restoration: single crowns and a three-piece fixed partial prosthesis on two implants. To quantify bone loss, parallelized periapical radiographs were analyzed at the time of implant placement and after two years of functional load. Results: A total of 120 implants were placed in 53 patients. After statistical analysis it was observed that for each type of implant bone loss was 0.97 ± 0.91 mm for bone level and 0.31 ± 0.48 mm for tissue level. No significant differences were found regarding the type of prosthesis and the location (maxilla or mandible) of the implants. Conclusions: Tissue level implants with a convergent transepithelial neck exhibit less peri-implant bone loss than bone level implants regardless of the type of prosthesis.

Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of the implantation in the lateral part of the mandible between short tissue level (TE) and bone level (BL) implant systems

2017 ◽  
Vol 213 ◽  
pp. 78-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub Hadzik ◽  
Ute Botzenhart ◽  
Maciej Krawiec ◽  
Tomasz Gedrange ◽  
Friedhelm Heinemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Tissue Level ◽  
Lateral Part ◽  
Bone Level

Long-Term Esthetic Outcome of Tissue-Level and Bone-Level Implants in the Anterior Maxilla

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 905-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carola Siebert ◽  
Dominik Rieder ◽  
Jochen Eggert ◽  
Manfred Wichmann ◽  
Siegfried Heckmann
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Level ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Bone Level

scholarly journals Primary Stability Optimization by Using Fixtures with Different Thread Depth According To Bone Density: A Clinical Prospective Study on Early Loaded Implants

Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (15) ◽  
pp. 2398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Makary ◽  
Abdallah Menhall ◽  
Carole Zammarie ◽  
Teresa Lombardi ◽  
Seung Yeup Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Density ◽  
Primary Stability ◽  
Stability Loss ◽  
Insertion Torque ◽  
Implant Stability ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Early Loading ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Implant Therapy ◽  
Provisional Restoration

Background: Macro- and micro-geometry are among the factors influencing implant stability and potentially determining loading protocol. The purpose of this study was to test a protocol for early loading by controlling implant stability with the selection of fixtures with different thread depth according to the bone density of the implant site. Materials and Methods: Patients needing implant therapy for fixed prosthetic rehabilitation were treated by inserting fixtures with four different thread diameters, selected based on clinical assessment of bone quality at placement (D1, D2, D3, and D4, according to Misch classification). Final insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were recorded at baseline and ISQ measurements repeated after one, two, three, and four weeks. At the three-week measurement (four weeks after implant replacement), implants with ISQ > 70 Ncm were functionally loaded with provisional restorations. Marginal bone level was radiographically measured 12 months after implant insertion. Results: Fourteen patients were treated with the insertion of forty implants: Among them, 39 implants showing ISQ > 70 after 3 weeks of healing were loaded with provisional restoration. Mean IT value was 82.3 ± 33.2 Ncm and varied between the four different types of bone (107.2 ± 35.6 Ncm, 74.7 ± 14.0 Ncm, 76.5 ± 31.1 Ncm, and 55.2 ± 22.6 Ncm in D1, D2, D3, and D4 bone, respectively). Results showed significant differences except between D2 and D3 bone types. Mean ISQ at baseline was 79.3 ± 4.3 and values in D1, D2, D3, and D4 bone were 81.9 ± 2.0, 81.1 ± 1.0, 78.3 ± 3.7, and 73.2 ± 4.9, respectively. Results showed significant differences except between D1 and D2 bone types. IT and ISQ showed a significant positive correlation when analyzing the entire sample (p = 0.0002) and D4 bone type (p = 0.0008). The correlation between IT and ISQ was not significant when considering D1, D2, and D3 types (p = 0.28; p = 0.31; p = 0.16, respectively). ISQ values showed a slight drop at three weeks for D1, D2, and D3 bone while remaining almost unchanged in D4 bone. At 12-month follow-up, all implants (39 early loading, 1 conventional loading) had satisfactory function, showing an average marginal bone loss of 0.12 ± 0.12 mm, when compared to baseline levels. Conclusion: Matching implant macro-geometry to bone density can lead to adequate implant stability both in hard and soft bone. High primary stability and limited implant stability loss during the first month of healing could allow the application of early loading protocols with predictable clinical outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document